Even Harvard Can't Afford Subscriptions To Academic Journals; Pushes For Open Access
from the says-it-all dept
Techdirt has published several posts recently about the growing anger among scholars over the way their work is exploited by academic publishers. But there's another angle to the story, that of the academic institutions who have to pay for the journals needed by their professors and students. Via a number of people, we learn that the scholars' revolt has spread there, too:We write to communicate an untenable situation facing the Harvard Library. Many large journal publishers have made the scholarly communication environment fiscally unsustainable and academically restrictive. This situation is exacerbated by efforts of certain publishers (called "providers") to acquire, bundle, and increase the pricing on journals.As a result, Harvard's Faculty Advisory Council has come to the following conclusion:
Harvard’s annual cost for journals from these providers now approaches $3.75M. In 2010, the comparable amount accounted for more than 20% of all periodical subscription costs and just under 10% of all collection costs for everything the Library acquires. Some journals cost as much as $40,000 per year, others in the tens of thousands. Prices for online content from two providers have increased by about 145% over the past six years, which far exceeds not only the consumer price index, but also the higher education and the library price indices.
major periodical subscriptions, especially to electronic journals published by historically key providers, cannot be sustained: continuing these subscriptions on their current footing is financially untenable. Doing so would seriously erode collection efforts in many other areas, already compromised.So what's the solution? Open access, of course. Here are the Faculty Advisory Council's suggestions for how to promote it:
1. Make sure that all of your own papers are accessible by submitting them to DASH [Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard] in accordance with the faculty-initiated open-access policies.If one of the world's top and presumably wealthiest universities says the current approach to academic publishing "cannot be sustained", you know that something is seriously wrong with that system. Coupled with the more than 10,000 academics who have now joined the Elsevier Boycott, this latest turn of events suggests that the tipping point for open access is close.
2. Consider submitting articles to open-access journals, or to ones that have reasonable, sustainable subscription costs; move prestige to open access.
3. If on the editorial board of a journal involved, determine if it can be published as open access material, or independently from publishers that practice pricing described above. If not, consider resigning.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: academic publisher, harvard, open access
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
wow
Keep raising the legitimate price of content that is readily available for less or free illegally, and the consumer will simply stop buying and seek a legitimate alternative. Or worse, make a legitimate alternative.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
wow
Keep raising the legitimate price of content that is readily available for less or free illegally, and the consumer will simply stop buying and seek a legitimate alternative. Or worse, make a legitimate alternative.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Harvard's cost inflation can't keep pace with the journals'?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Harvard's cost inflation can't keep pace with the journals'?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Harvard's cost inflation can't keep pace with the journals'?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Harvard's cost inflation can't keep pace with the journals'?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Harvard's cost inflation can't keep pace with the journals'?
You are clueless. Harvard maybe could afford these prices - but they recognise that few other institutions can - and so they are doing everyone else a favour by pushing their own academics to publish in cheaper venues.
This is a welcome development. Less prestigious places can't afford to lead this charge but Harvard can.
Next time, think before you comment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Harvard's cost inflation can't keep pace with the journals'?
They're not crying poverty. They're saying that they're not getting anywhere near the value in return for the money they're spending.
Even the wealthiest don't like throwing money down the shitter for nothing in return. How do you think they got to be wealthy, genius?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Harvard's cost inflation can't keep pace with the journals'?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Harvard's cost inflation can't keep pace with the journals'?
The student debt bubble is coming, just like the housing bubble. Lending someone who has no income $200K to buy a house is the same as lending someone who will have no prospects $200K to get an Arts degree in Comparative Religions. US Student debt is at $1 trillion, and a significant portion of that won't be paid back (no matter what the bankruptcy laws say), because the economy has slowed and won't be back for a while.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Harvard's cost inflation can't keep pace with the journals'?
Because these 20y/o students won't have any time in the next 30 years to earn it back?
As inflation keeps going up, the relative amount students owe keeps going down.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Harvard's cost inflation can't keep pace with the journals'?
As does the relative amount people earn. Unless you believe that all employers adjust their employees wages and salaries for inflation?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Harvard's cost inflation can't keep pace with the journals'?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Harvard's cost inflation can't keep pace with the journals'?
But for Harvard to complain "it's gone up an average of 16% over the last 6 years" doesn't sound nearly as dramatic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Harvard's cost inflation can't keep pace with the journals'?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As usual, they will think that they take the right approach in suing them, and scaring them into submission, when in fact they'll just convince everyone that they need to stay as far away as possible from Elsevier.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Be Nice
Agreed, that is kind of hard to do without showing some signs of irritation at the slow progress. Encourage them to also make some progress on other outstanding educational problems, such as the unnecessarily high price of textbooks, the copyright licensing problem, the high tuition fees problem, the inadequately documented curriculum problem and the poor quality free lecture problem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Be Nice
To people on the outside it seems like a late reaction, but my experience is that this is finaly a closing of the divide between professors and the university institutions or - even more so - the directions.
It has been common practise for professors at certain universities to more or less ignore copyright and it has been going on for at least the last decade. If they have written a book themself most are willing to give it to the students in a PDF for free since their share of sales is so negligible. Also photo-copies of copyrighted material is seen as less of a problem. I believe mostly because the professors in different areas of expertice are communicating and I can only assume that they have agreed that education is more important than the change they earn from sales.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Music to my ears.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All we need is the movie...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm guessing the Math department wasn't involved in writing this...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Harvard Can't Afford Subscriptions To Academic Journals
Before commenting on the costs other journals, it would nice if they reduced the prices of journals published by Harvard University.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Half of the MIT education is free
[ link to this | view in chronology ]