Hasbro Offers Nerf Blogger Free Samples, Sends Lawyers And Investigators Instead
from the what-a-way-to-treat-a-fan dept
We've praised Hasbro in the past for embracing and supporting the fan culture that surrounds the My Little Pony cartoon, but we've also pointed out that they aren't always so accommodating. This story, unfortunately, falls into the latter category. Callum points us to a rather disturbing tale from the operator of an Australian blog about Nerf, another Hasbro product, who got quite a shock out of what he thought was a friendly gesture by the company.
It started wonderfully: he was contacted by a Hasbro product manager who was asking for his mailing address so she could send him some free samples of a rare-in-Australia Nerf gun to offer as a promotional giveaway on the blog. He gave it to her, and soon after got something in the mail from Hasbro: a legal nastygram.
Not the nastiest of nastygrams, sure—in fact he makes a point of saying how polite it was. Which is why he decided to comply with its request that he take down some photos of an unreleased Nerf gun from the blog, which Hasbro claimed were copyrighted and confidential. The letter also asked him to tell them where he got the images, and he responded explaining that he's not sure where they came from because he gets photos sent to him constantly—and also reminded them that journalists and their sources have certain protections under Australian law. They emailed back and said they wanted to talk more on the phone; he responded saying the matter seemed to be resolved and he couldn't see any point in talking further. In the mean time, he got another email from another product manager confirming that they were sending him free samples! He was understandably confused, and then things got genuinely nasty:
Flash forward to today- I forgot all about this for a bit and didn't reply to the latest letter from the lawyers. Then I get stories from neighbours that some strange woman and some burly, repo-looking type is hanging around my apartment block. How creepy is that?
Sadly they weren't here to give me free stuff. Turns out they're from Hasbro's lawyers!!! I told them the same stuff all over again and tried to explain that I got a bunch of stuff from ebay and taobao – of course they haven't heard of taobao and seem to want me to do their job for them.
Yup. They sent people to his house to investigate and intimidate him. All while at the same time trying to court him with free stuff from another arm of the organization. At first, naturally, he wondered if the offer of free samples was a ruse to track him down, but Hasbro's lawyers roundly denied that and as the story began to gain traction, Hasbro released a statement on the Nerf Facebook page:
We appreciate the opportunity to provide the following statement concerning Hasbro’s investigation into “leaked” IP information regarding its NERF brand products. As with anything, there are two sides to every story. While we cannot comment on the details of any ongoing investigation, Hasbro takes all circumstances of its stolen and leaked IP very seriously and will continue to investigate sources of unauthorized information and products as it relates to its brands. We would like to clarify one of the inaccuracies that has been reported. While a local Hasbro Australia marketing team did reach out to the Urban Taggers website to engage in promotional activity for which it required its address, it was completely unrelated to the confidential global investigation being conducted on Hasbro’s behalf by independent investigators looking into sources of leaked IP information. Hasbro greatly values and appreciates its fan communities and is very proud of its strong relationships with many bloggers and sites that cover our brands and products.
I'm inclined to believe them—but that doesn't make their behavior all that much less shameful. This is a problem a lot of big companies have: their legal departments and their marketing departments are completely disconnected, so one is out there encouraging activity that the other is trying to squash. It's why you get nonsense like Viacom suing YouTube over videos they uploaded themselves. This may have just been a coincidence with really horrible timing, but at the end of the day it's no way to treat a customer—much less a super-customer who promotes your products to others.
Oh, and he never got his free Nerf guns.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: intimidation, nastygram, nerf
Companies: hasbro
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
typo
Should be "ruse", I believe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: typo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: typo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: typo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: typo
If you rouse out the mouse from your house in the mews then he'll spy your spouse who's your muse for the blues. Then the mouse as his dues will take your spouse on a cruise to Tolous while he spews vows of misuse, then the mouse is louse with nothing to loose. So why rouse a mouse who's done no abuse to your house in the mews, instead drink some booze!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: typo
and thats why we had to kill daddy, he gave the mouse a cookie.
o.0
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: typo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: typo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
/s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
-Freetard, Freeloads, etc etc, want everything for free.
-You failed to insult Mike (either directly or otherwise).
Had you been a real troll, I would have to point out Leigh wrote this and not Mike.
you did include a /s, so i think that deserves a D- for the attempt. |-(
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
... another company that doesn't get it
Nice job there Hasbro!
I suppose we'll see these images available everywhere in a day or two and then they won't be able to stop the spread.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ... another company that doesn't get it
I suppose we'll see these images available everywhere in a day or two and then they won't be able to stop the spread."
And that would in fact be great for Hasbro, as the people who are into their stuff would be getting all excited. Now, people will be thinking, oh isn't that the crappy thing from that shitty company?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ... another company that doesn't get it
You're assuming that anyone cares.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
1) Let's Kill all the lawyers
It makes more sense now than ever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bastards
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another corporation to boycott?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Another corporation to boycott?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They have not "clarified an inaccuracy", they have tried to deflect blame.
I work in a company that has a design/installation department and a service department. They are effectively operated as separate businesses and there isn't a lot of overlap between the divisions' activities, but we are constantly reminded of the fact that from the customer's perspective we are one company.
As far as this guy's concerned Hasbo contacted him for promotional purposes and Hasbo investigated him as a source of leaked IP information. They need to be up front and apologise for what Hasbo did rather than point the finger at another division.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
As far as my experience with Hasbro, they were awfully polite in their cease and desist letter when a song for MLP was leaked early, and the Brony community for the most part honored Hasbro's wishes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
There is no low to which corporations are incapable of stooping. None.
Always remember that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Hasbro is a big, big company".
Like it or not, in companies that large the right hand and the left hand are often not only far apart, but located on different bodies.
The whole story makes way more sense when you look at it that way. Buy you don't generally do that, because you seem to feel that very large multinational companies should have the same communication speed, accuracy, and cohesive action plan as a single brain. Just more proof that you don't appear to work in the real world, or perhaps just in an isolated corner of the copyright world making minor photoshop edits to people's used car ads.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If they don't know what one another is doing that is to the court a form of incompetence, misdirection or both.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I am making these comments with the understanding that you wrote those words, but also with the understanding that you just don't seem to believe them, grok them, or really care about them. It's a big long post to say "It's a big company", and then still to try to find a way to vilify them - and to take a shot at a **AA company.
Your post (like many) is a self-serving turd.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
"Aww, leave the poor company alone! They are much too big to be criticized!"
That's an.... interesting outlook. Afraid it's not one many people share, though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And yes, we all know how much you would love to 'slam' Marcus, and how easy you would find the idea ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
So, when the oil spilled, people were being pretty "self-serving" by criticizing BP - they just weren't living in the "real world" where, hey, it's not like you can follow every safety procedure right? So let's let those poor guys at BP off the hook and stop trying to "vilify" them when they're only crime was being a big company.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hasbro & it's representatives have acted extremely strange and unprofessionally (ethical concerns as well) and any Australian Judge would be very intrigued with the way the solicitors have responded and how hasbro has done certain things (A Facebook oficial page response? Really???)
Though the sneaky ways of extracting info, by asking for address, then phone number (hopefully he never gave it) and then sending 'investigators' around to sniff him out are normal though the way the 'investigators' confronted him at his residence is highly unethical and liable to get them charged with harassment and/or intimidation or at the least having an ADVO (a type of Police created restraining order) placed on them.
My advice to Mr Callum [if he reads this] would be to forward any and all further correspondence (in any way) to a solicitor (Check law Society in your State), keep a camera handy for if the 'investigators' show up again, call the police if they confront you, and say nothing anymore other than through your solicitor.
You also might want to make a complaint to the Legal Society in your state about the unprofessional nature of the correspondence (especially the 24hr notice in first letter) and intimidatory investigators.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Further developments
Seems My advice above was given by others too. From Crikey:
http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/04/24/nerf-guns-at-10-paces-hasbro-faces-boycott-after-siccin g-lawyers-onto-fan-site/
Though the following Meme that is floating around says it all I think :)
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-UYADQv0KpEo/T5X6NJIWtVI/AAAAAAAAERc/kQgUWM1M248/s1600/hasbrobaby.jpg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He's using blogspot, and doesn't have his real name or contact details anywhere on the site.
The timing's also too convenient, give a company your address, a few days later, receive a letter from them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't support bullies.
Which leads me to believe that yes, it was a ruse to get his address.
Hasbro? Hadbro you mean?
Hasbro, you won't be getting any of my money. You can keep your stupid ponies and your nerf products, and stick them where the sun doesn't shine.
I don't support bullies!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I don't support bullies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For those of you that want to stop watching MLP:FIM because of this
The creator of the show Lauren Faust isn't even working for Hasbro.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On another note, this is what you get for aligning your life around collecting a line of commercial products. They will always make you regret it.
On another note, nerf? Really? Who becomes a nerf evangelist?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
love nerf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]