Of All The Coats, In All The Scenes, In All The Films: Burberry Threatened Over Humphrey Bogart Publicity Rights
from the this-could-be-the-beginning-of-a-beautiful-lawsuit dept
One of the cooler features of Facebook's Timeline for businesses is the ability to go back and fill in milestones and events over the years. Some companies have long and very interesting histories, and for them a historical timeline is the perfect opportunity to engage in advertising-as-content. This is clearly what famed luxury brand Burberry was trying to do when they filled out their timeline with vintage advertisements and examples of Burberry's role in fashion and culture—including an image from Casablanca of Humphrey Bogart wearing a Burberry coat. Naturally it wasn't long before they started receiving legal threats from the company that controls Bogart's publicity rights and the trademarks associated with his name—but Burberry is fighting back. PaidContent reports that they have filed for declaratory judgment that their use of the image is not infringing.
As the filing (embedded below) asserts, Burberry's use of the image is legitimate in every way and clearly protected by the First Amendment. The company is simply showcasing a factual, historical example of an important use of the brand, and there is no reasonable alternative way they could convey the same information. Even in terms of copyright, Burberry would have a strong fair use argument—but the company actually obtained the necessary copyright licenses for the image, so that's not even an issue. In terms of trademarks and publicity rights, the infringement claim is even more spurious: the use of the image in no way implies personal endorsement or any commercial connection to Bogart. The only implied endorsement is that a Burberry coat was part of an iconic outfit from an iconic movie—and that's a plain and simple fact that anyone is free to report. Using a single frame from a film to demonstrate that fact is a clear-cut case of free speech, regardless of any rights that may be attached to the image or the celebrities therein.
We've noted before that publicity rights are new and kind of scary. In some ways they make the same kind of sense as trademarks: it's in the best interest of both companies and the consumer that brands can't misrepresent celebrities as endorsing their products when they actually don't, just as we don't want brands unfairly capitalizing on each others' goodwill. But, just like trademarks and every other form of intellectual property, publicity rights are breeding an ownership mentality where people think they can control any and all uses of something. These threats against Burberry are a prime example of that—and hopefully the judge grants them their declaratory judgment and sends a clear message that publicity rights do not supersede freedom of speech.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: casablanca, first amendment, humphrey bogart, publicity rights, trademark
Companies: burberry
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
They remade Casablanca?
"Of all the space bars in all the worlds, you had to re-materialise in mine."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They remade Casablanca?
And on topic, to put it in Bogart's manner of speaking, "IP's gotta go, schweethaht."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They remade Casablanca?
So whos going to sue for it :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I for one am fed up with it.
How about you guys ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
To be clear that IS the case with most publicity rights laws. The majority of them do not confer any rights after death. There are just a few states whose publicity rights laws do allow the rights to live on after death.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Unfortunately, by the same logic, the Hemingway estate should be paying Abercrombie and Fitch for selling Ernest the gun with which he shot himself...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Cool! I propose a Publicity tax.. The more publicity you require the more tax you pay..
What? you are all against it? But why? Can't you see the absolute good it will ensure by bankrupting the likes of the Kardashians and Snooky's of the world..
That can only be a good thing! ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bref commentaire...
And - reading about this makes me want to get a Burberry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Burberry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Burberry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Burberry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Burberry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Burberry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Burberry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Like the fashion industry has never done this...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]