TomTom Kicks Off FUD Campaign Against 'Dangerous' Open Source Mapping
from the going-down dept
Recently, Techdirt wrote about the increasing number of Web sites that were dumping Google Maps and turning to OpenStreetMap (OSM) instead. But that's only one aspect of the increasingly important digital mapping sector: another is for use with in-car satnav systems. So an obvious question is: how is OpenStreetMap doing here?
Looks like the satnav manufacturer TomTom has just provided us with an answer (found via Slashdot):
Despite the positives, recent studies have highlighted some major drawbacks of open source mapping, specifically with regard to safety, accuracy and reliability. In one particular instance, a leading open source map was compared against a professional TomTom map, and shown to have a third less residential road coverage and 16% less basic map attributes such as street names. Worse still, it blended pedestrian and car map geometry, and included 'a high number of fields and forest trails' classified as roads.
As TomTom explains, this is a Bad Thing:
Many drivers rely heavily on satellite navigation for precise directions, and mapping errors can be extremely dangerous, particularly in the case of one-way streets.
Just in case you didn't get the message, TomTom concludes:
Open source mapping certainly has its benefits and can be extremely useful, particularly for pedestrians and in city or town centres. The way that the maps incorporate input from a wide community of contributors can result in impressive international coverage, whilst also driving down costs of production. However, when it comes to automotive-grade mapping, open source has some quite serious limitations, falling short on the levels of accuracy and reliability required for safe navigation.
Unfortunately, TomTom doesn't share its sources for these figures, but Carlo Daffara pointed us to this research from December 2011 that provides a more detailed analysis of the relative merits of TomTom and OpenStreetMap in Germany. This is what it found:
With a relative completeness comparison between the OSM database and TomTom's commercial dataset, we proved that OSM provides 27% more data within Germany with regard to the total street network and route information for pedestrians. On the contrary, OSM is still missing about 9% of data related to car navigation. According to our projection for the future, this discrepancy should disappear by the middle or end of 2012, and the OSM dataset for Germany should then feature a comparative route network for
cars as provided by TomTom.
So OpenStreetMap is actually better than TomTom for the total street network and route information for pedestrians. However, the study also considered the issue of street names raised by TomTom and "turn restrictions" -- places where drivers must or must not turn:
In addition to the route network comparisons, we conducted further analyses regarding topology errors and the completeness of street name information. The results showed that the OSM dataset is not flawless; however, the trend shows that the relative and absolute number of errors is decreasing. Thus, it can also be discerned that not only is new data being added to the project database but also quality assurance is becoming a major factor within the OSM community. Our findings with regard to turn restrictions within the OSM database, which are of critical importance to navigation, showed that based on the current development rate and activity, it will take more than five years for OSM to catch up with the information found in the proprietary dataset used in our analysis.
So in Germany at least, TomTom's criticisms about the poorer coverage of street names and "turn restrictions" are probably justified -- at the moment. But what the research clearly suggests is that it is probably just a matter of time before OpenStreetMap becomes better than TomTom in this area just as it already is in terms of basic street coverage.
The fact that TomTom has chosen to highlight this current deficiency in OpenStreetMap shows two things. First, that it is watching the open source alternative very closely, and secondly, that it is sufficiently worried by what it sees to start sowing some FUD in people's minds. But as history has shown with both open source server software and open source encyclopaedias, once vendors of proprietary systems adopt such a tactic against up-and-coming free rivals, it's a clear sign that it's already too late to do anything about it, and that their days of undisputed dominance are numbered.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: google maps, maps, openstreetmap, safety, satnav
Companies: google, tomtom
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I don't know how they can continue to survive. My cell phone has GPS and access to Google Maps, and does a pretty good job of telling me where to turn and what traffic is like along the route. With the exception of my trusty Vista (old school GPS) running open source firmware, which I use for hiking and biking, I have no use for a separate GPS receiver. I have a mounting bracket for my phone which I can use to display it as a GPS while I am in the car, when I need it, and with the bluetooth headset, it even talks to me as I am driving so I don't need to see it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So now they're not only threatened by smartphones and google navigation, their big source of income (maps) is 'attacked' from another direction as well.
The companies that rely on this model will have to change, and soon. But I fear that most of them will deny this, and I fully expect that they will arm their legal cannons as soon as OSM devices start to look like they can rival theirs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
just like the entertainment industries, rather than actually make your own product better, cheaper, easier or whatever and then compete to get/keep customers, i assume TomTom will go down the 'gonna sue you' route. the money wasted could be spent improving the service and the customer experience, but, as with most things and most companies, customers dont matter, until you have none, that is and your product/company fails!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ummm
A majority of the drivers on the road were doing just fine NOT killing themselves before SatNav became popular. Does turning on a SatNav turn off their brains suddenly or has society become just THAT litigious?
Now I'm wondering why the people that publish the paper maps that we used to buy at gas stations haven't sued Google and TomTom for killing their business model.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In reality, I doubt that software using the OSS solution would be any more dangerous than someone using TomTom, especially if they've had it for a few years and not updated its maps recently.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Funny they mention one-way streets...
And "extremely dangerous"? How hard it is to see the the turn signs and follow them if the GPS is wrong?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Funny they mention one-way streets...
In another instance, they had some address info wrong on a main road in town, a friend sent them a notice about it, they acknowledged it and fixed it. So Google, like OSM, will quickly make corrections/additions when notified.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Heh.
1) Make wild claims of superior product
2) Do not reveal sources of data
3) ???
4) Profit !!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Everyone knows that it is much safer to guided into a ditch by professionals.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Flawed comparison
Having used my TomTom for years (and loved it), I can guarantee it's anything but accurate. I always expect that it's going to lead me to a goat path or something else long grown over whenever I'm out travelling.
I'd love a good TomTom like gps that used continuously updated OSM maps.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TomTom just started on step 2.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's a pretty idiotic stance for TomTom to take, given that they use the opposite argument when it comes to their own liability. I can see this statement coming back to bite them the next time someone sues because they paid more attention to their GPS than to street signs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]