When The Entertainment Industry Can't Legally Shut Down A Site It Doesn't Like, Bogus Charges Can Do The Trick

from the industry-bullies dept

Tue, Jun 12th 2012 4:03am — Mike Masnick

Back in 2009, we wrote about how anti-piracy organization FACT worked closely with UK law enforcement to have the guy who operated Filesoup arrested. At the time, we noted that it wasn't at all clear what he was doing that was illegal, as the site was merely a forum. Though some people did, in fact, use that forum for the sake of infringement, that shouldn't implicate the forum host. And, in fact, after about a year and a half, the courts dropped the case, realizing that the arguments the industry kept feeding law enforcement didn't add up to anything illegal. The court noted that the charges never should have been brought in the first place. Of course, that's small comfort to the folks who ran the site and had to go through this ordeal. The site has announced that it's shutting down, and the arrests and lawsuits were a big part of what killed it.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: bullying, fact, forums, liability
Companies: filesoup

52 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Josef Anvil (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 4:10am

Maybe it's just me
An organization called FACT shuts a site down with bogus charges is pretty ironic. Maybe the police were confused and the organization should change its acronym to BOGUS so that even a moron in a hurry can divine their plans.

I'll leave it up to the TechDirt community to come up with the meaning of BOGUS.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The eejit (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 4:29am
  
  Re: Maybe it's just me
  Well, FACT are the same group of people behind the iiNet suit. Which they failed massively. So, I think I'll stick with my freebooting, ta.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Austronymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 4:33am
    
    Re: Re: Maybe it's just me
    Actually, that's AFACT, similar name, but not the exact same group.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 5:02am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Maybe it's just me
      but it is no mere coincidence; like most bills and groups in this area, their name tends to be the exact opposite of their goals and methods.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Torg (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 6:28am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Maybe it's just me
        "a-", used as a prefix, usually means "without". Therefore, calling such an organization afact is actually being fairly honest.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Richard (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 7:05am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Maybe it's just me
        as in afactual...
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - The eejit (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 7:18am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Maybe it's just me
      AFACT is actually the Australian district of FACT. Otherwise, they'd be plagiarizing their federation's name, which is, in their eyes...content theft.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Berenerd (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 8:42am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Maybe it's just me
        "AFACT is actually the Australian district of FACT. Otherwise, they'd be plagiarizing their federation's name, which is, in their eyes...content theft."
        
        Not entirely true, there have been may occasions where the labels stole their own content and simply blamed someone else.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Greg G (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 5:01am
  
  Re: Maybe it's just me
  Brain-dead Old Guys Uselessly Suing?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Josef Anvil (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 5:52am
    
    Re: Re: Maybe it's just me
    Nice. Or... Buying Officials and Guilds then Uselessly Suing
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 6:50am
  
  Re: Maybe it's just me
  Bribing Officials Gets U SOPA
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 7:39am
  
  Re: Maybe it's just me
  Benign
  Organization
  Going
  Ultra
  Syncophantic
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Cory of PC (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 8:26am
  
  Re: Maybe it's just me
  Boring
  Old-timers
  Getting
  Useless
  Somehow
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Any Mouse (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 1:23pm
  
  Re: Maybe it's just me
  Buying
  Uut
  Government
  Using
  Subterfuge
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 4:18am

FACT?
Ironic name.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nellius, 12 Jun 2012 @ 4:21am

Ironically, FACT stands for Federation Against Copyright Theft. That in itself shows how stupidly out of touch they are with these things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Richard (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 4:23am
  
  Re:
  They should be campaigning against term extension and against certain practices of big entertainment companies with that name - since those practices actually do amount to theft.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - The eejit (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 4:29am
    
    Re: Re:
    nah, too expensive, and not enough money in it.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 6:52am
  
  Re:
  Been curious, just how do you steal a copyright? I know the record labels do it with odious contracts, but how does the rank and file guy go about it?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Richard (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 7:07am
    
    Re: Re:
    Submit a request to Youtube to monetize somebody else's video.
    
    Of course it's difficult for a rank and file guy - but it's the easiest way for a corporation of reasonable size.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - The eejit (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 7:19am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      And it's tax-deductible! One way to bilk everyone at once! Ain't the DMCA grand?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Ron Rezendes (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 10:39am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        If, by grand, you mean:
        Grossly Regulated And Naturally Devious.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 4:59am

typical of the way the entertainment industries do things. they are always complaining about all the illegal activities that are going on but are very quick to act in the same illegal way when they cant achieve what they want. usual double standards. nothing illegal with what is happening somewhere, just not liked, so sue knowing it will cost an absolute fortune to defend against trumped up charges forcing closure and getting what was wanted all along. shame the various law makers didn't do something about this practice but there again, they aren't getting kick backs from legal sources are they?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 5:10am

FACETIOUS
Federation Against Copyright Enforcement Totally Independent of United States
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
gorehound (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 5:11am

MAFIAA pulls illegal shit all the time and in many ways.
Fuckwads Association of Cock Twads !
Your whole Entertainment Industry is Censored from my Money for life.No Theater, No Netflix, No digital Services that allow MAFIAA to get my money, and will only purchase a sed product.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mega1987 (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 5:26am

seriously...
Why these big industries are in shoot first, ask question later?

don't like competition? then you guys might not like thinking new ways on attracting customers to you group, and knocking other smaller competitors out...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
abc gum, 12 Jun 2012 @ 5:38am

Once again it's High Court - low court

If a commoner were to levy bogus charges against some fatcat outfit there would be repercussions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mike C. (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 5:44am

FACTLESS
Federation Against Copyright Theft Lying Excessively in Support of Shutdown

/works for me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 6:31am

How do you steal a copyright? I'm not sure. But FACT knows.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Digitari, 12 Jun 2012 @ 6:35am

Re:
Bitchy Old Guru's Underestimating Society

( I was awesome at acrophobia, back in the day )
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 6:45am

Idle question
Could Filesoup sue for wrong arrest here?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 6:46am

Idle question
Could Filesoup sue for wrongful arrest here?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- G Thompson (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 7:03am
  
  Re: Idle question
  Not to up on UK law in this regard, but if anything like AU law (which AU is based more on UK law than USA) then yes and no..
  
  To initiate and win at a malicious prosecution suit they would have to prove that the charges were laid for malicious purposes, which is easier said than done. Since FACT would state (as the police would too) that they were basing their 'facts' on what they understood at the time and for no nefarious purposes. Though if you could prove it by evidential means (whistleblowing, emails, etc) then the case would be an interesting one.
  
  They might be able to prove Tortuous Interference though for any of these there is one glaringly obvious and real stumbling block. MONEY! It costs money to take a civil case to court or even to put paperwork together, and this is something Filesoup and it's principals do not currently have, unless some nice person would like to foot the bill for solicitors and barristers which do not come cheap.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Richard (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 7:10am
    
    Re: Re: Idle question
    I believe that there is a complaint in progress against the police - based on their failure to observe proper guidelines during the arrest and seizure process.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- PaulT (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 8:34am
  
  Re: Idle question
  Almost irrelevant, sadly. Even if they can, or even are, pursuing this to the limits of the law, their business has already been shut down. If it took this long for the authorities to even admit they didn't have a case, the negative effects of such false accusations will have had their effect on the industry long before they get their due compensation.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - TtfnJohn (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 11:07am
    
    Re: Re: Idle question
    I'd agree with you that the business is gone. If, however, they get a ruling against the authorities then that informs the next site to be clobbered like this. Whether or not they can afford it and want to pursue it is the question.
    
    There's already the court ruling that says the arrest and all that followed shouldn't have happened which sets something of a precedent itself. Something that backs that up would be helpful if not entirely necessary.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 7:12am

ICE T
You would think that someone would be filing takedown notices against all the entertainment industry's websites and just generally crank up the heat, since there doesn't seem to be any consequences for false accusations.
They must be infringing on something!

Of course,they do control the ICE Machine.

Where's Anonymous when u need them?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 8:06am

If what the forum was doing wasn't illegal, it really should be. It's only reason for existing was helping people to get illegal downloads. While the laws have not caught up specifically with this stuff, you wouldn't be able to do it "in the real world" and get away with it for long.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 9:17am
  
  Re:
  You ever see those streets with vendors selling bootlegged copies of stuff? Yeah, I do too, and they're still getting away with it and have been for a long time.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- TtfnJohn (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 11:10am
  
  Re:
  Did you ever hear of the forum or visit it before it was closed down or are you just taking FACT's word for it?
  
  That didn't seem to be enough for the court, now, did it?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The eejit (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 11:19am
  
  Re:
  ...and? That's pretty clearly an economics issue - basically, your business model is shit and full of shit and you're shit.
  
  Which is why I buy non-major-produced content, for the most part.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 12:19pm
  
  Re:
  you wouldn't be able to do it "in the real world" and get away with it for long.
  
  Could you offer a link or tweet or something to back that up?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 9:06pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Stand on a street corner and sell access to child porn, or to snuff movies... and see how long it takes before someone takes you out.
    
    Most of the major file locker sites, besides being a great place to keep your pirated goods, are also great places to keep your child porn and abuse videos. It's a business model that invites abuse.
    
    Forums generally are just front ends for the affiliate programs of these file locker sites. Rip a DVD, put it up, spam every pirate movie forum, and collect a pay check when people pay to get access to your file.
    
    Understanding what they do and how they operate is key to understanding why, if it isn't illegal, it should be.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - PaulT (profile), 13 Jun 2012 @ 1:49am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      "Most of the major file locker sites, besides being a great place to keep your pirated goods, are also great places to keep your child porn and abuse videos. It's a business model that invites abuse."
      
      Even more than that, they were great ways to get legal content and for the people who produced it to get some cash at the same time. Yet, you seem intent on ignoring the many legitimate uses and double down on your idiocy by building strawmen and other crap (has any child porn been found on MU or Filesoup, for example? Citation please).
      
      "Forums generally are just front ends for the affiliate programs of these file locker sites. Rip a DVD, put it up, spam every pirate movie forum, and collect a pay check when people pay to get access to your file."
      
      What you've just described is exactly how legal content was advertised as well. But, you ignore independent artists so long as your corporations can shut down competition, we know that.
      
      "Understanding what they do and how they operate is key to understanding why, if it isn't illegal, it should be."
      
      If it's not illegal, then they should not be shut down or prosecuted unless the law is changed to make them illegal. Not only do you reject the idea of innocent until proven guilty that Western justice is based upon, you also seem to want to make up laws that can be applied at a whim to people who don't know they exist (because they don't). As ever, reality is this way over here, join us...
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 13 Jun 2012 @ 2:04am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      >Most of the major file locker sites, besides being a great place to keep your pirated goods, are also great places to keep your child porn and abuse videos.
      
      Emphasis mine. Funnily, if there were child porn and abuse videos on said file lockers, I think there's been enough attempts at enforcement to even get at Usenet/TOR groups so if you're going to insist that file lockers have child porn and abuse videos and are completely untouchable, go ahead and make citations. Unless you're speaking from experience?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Josef Anvil (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 8:09am

You guys are AWESOME!
Time for a recap... Instead of FACT, which makes little sense given the way the organization operates, it looks like there are quite a few good suggestions for changing their acronym to BOGUS that would better describe them and no longer confuse the police.

Brain-dead Old Guys Uselessly Suing
Buying Officials and Guilds then Uselessly Suing
Bitchy Old Guru's Underestimating Society
Bribing Officials Gets U SOPA
Benign Organization Going Ultra Syncophantic

Good stuff. Remember that it's this type of group effort that got Rick Santorum the infamous meaning for his last name.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 9:13am

within five to ten years the entertainment industry will probably be running its own, government sanctioned paramilitary hit squads. Just wait till 12 year old Lucy is abducted in the middle of the night by heavily armed stormtroopers, dragged to a kangaroo court with a jury of "big media" execs, then sentenced to death for downloading the Justin Bieber discography.

Her only chance for dying with any dignity would be to refuse to dig her own grave before they shot her in the back of the head...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 9:26am
  
  Re:
  quick! Buy extra tin foil before they run out or replace it with something else. Make sure your survival bunker has plenty of food, pirates porn, and wet naps. You will survive this upcoming paramilitary sweep!
  
  You do need to see a doctor though, your pills have run out.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 9:51am

As bad us the US legal system often is. I believe there would be a pretty strong civil case available to filesoup here
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2012 @ 11:47am

Hey! Everyone should remember we're free! Just as long as we do what they want when they want.

-Troll face
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For the Record, 13 Jun 2012 @ 10:55am

Where's the accountability?
Any entity filing false charges, especially charges that were origionally filed as part of some agenda driven by greed or profiteering has to be held accountable when those charges are found to be completely unfounded. All pain and suffering even in just stress and costs associated with the defense against false and or unfounded accusations should be compensated for. OTHERWISE, I am calling BULLSHIT.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Vincent Giannell, 13 Jun 2012 @ 5:39pm

Next thing you know, our government will write a law that will make online protesting against current laws illegal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]