Gov't Says They Requested 24,270 Wiretaps In Total; Sprint Alone Says They Received Over 50k Requests
from the something-doesn't-add-up dept
We already wrote about how Ed Markey found out that law enforcement had made more than 1.3 million requests for subscriber info last year, and he's now published the detailed responses, which is turning up some scary information. First off, the numbers are clearly low, because (at the very least) T-Mobile refused to provide any numbers, stating:While T‐Mobile does not disclose the number of requests we receive from law enforcement annually, the number of requests has risen dramatically in the last decade...Perhaps more troubling may be the tidbit that Julian Sanchez noticed in Sprint's response (pdf), in which they admit to 52,029 court orders for wiretaps:
Over the past five years, Sprint has received approximately 52,029 court orders for wiretaps; 77,519 court orders for the installation of a pen register/trap and trace device; and 196,434 court orders for location information. [...] Over the same time frame Sprint received subpoenas from law enforcement agencies requesting basic subscriber information. Each subpoena typically requested subscriber information on multiple subscribers and last year alone we estimate that Sprint received approximately 500,000 subpoenas from law enforcement.As Sanchez notes, this is problematic, because Sprint -- which is just the third largest mobile operator -- appears to be claiming more court orders for wiretaps than various officials reports to Congress of how many wiretaps had been sought in total. In other words, either Sprint's definition of "wirtetaps" is different than everyone else's, it's number is wrong... or... someone's been lying to Congress.
That seems like a pretty big miss by someone...Certainly a report of 52,029 wiretaps over five years--and that just from the third largest carrier in the country--is remarkable in and of itself. But it’s also more than double the number of all wiretaps counted in annual reports required by federal law. The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts keeps track of the number of wiretaps authorized each year for criminal investigations. The Justice Department files an annual report to Congress on individual warrants issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court for intelligence investigations. (If you don’t feel like wading through, The Electronic Privacy Information Center has charts and graphs that should make it clear.) The total number of all wiretaps counted in the official reports over the five year period 2007–2011 comes to 24,270. I’ve made a table breaking it down year by year:
YEAR TITLE III (Criminal) Wiretap Orders FISA (Intelligence) Wiretap Orders 2011 2,732 1,745 2010 3,795 1,579 2009 3,043 1,320 2008 2,631 2,083 2007 2,927 2,370 TOTAL 15,173 9,097
The obvious question: How is one cell phone carrier—and not the largest by a longshot—reporting 27,759 more wiretap orders than the official numbers acknowledge for all carriers?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: doj, ed markey, julian sanchez, surveillance, wiretap
Companies: sprint
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Great, not the goverment fucked up so bad they broke reality. again
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Differences
But I can offer one reasonable explanation... The numbers reported to Congress were requests for actual criminal investigations. The numbers reported from Spring and the other Telcos were requests for harassment, curiosity and just plain good old fashioned fun!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Differences
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bridge For Sale in Brooklyn NY
They all lie.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Take the example above, where the words "court ordered" play a big part in the outcome.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It also sickens me though that in the US pretty much anything to do with drugs is a felony. Felons cannot run for president. So how is it we always have presidents that have no problem telling everyone they tried drugs when they were younger?
If our legal system actually enforced the laws 100% then we would not be able to elect a new president. NO ONE lives in the USA and has made it to 35 without committing a felony. They might not have been convicted of it, BUT they have committed one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If everyone is a criminal, anyone can be arrested, charged and convicted of something, and deprived of their freedom at the whim of those powerful enough to trigger individually targeted "aggressive enforcement".
The US has rapidly descended to the point where law is barely if any less arbitary than the whims of the powerful.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Perhaps it's sort of like the law of conservation of mass "Matter can neither be created or destroyed" The inflated "Losses from Piracy" counter balance the deflated wiretap and censorship numbers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Like you can create negative matter that has negative mass. Not to be confused with anti-matter, which still has positive mass.
Matter + Anti-matter = Mass of both converted to energy (E=mc^2)
Matter + Negative Matter = Mass of both cancel each other out, no energy released.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I meant that you can create matter, but you also create negative matter at the same time.
So you are creating something and a negative something from nothing.
matter + negative matter = nothing
1+(-1)=0
Not that you are creating something from nothing
matter = nothing
+1=0
But then again, the whole entanglement concept is way above my head =P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Energy is infinite. Differences in energy may coalesce into matter. The crux of it is that empty space is inherently unstable. Virtual particles pop into and out of existence randomly. Given the right (unknown) circumstances, a huge wave of energy could be released from empty space creating a universe and matter with it. That's the QM view of the big bang as I understand it.
Anyway, creating matter seems to have happened at least once before. I'd like to thing we could maybe one day recreate something similar on a smaller scale to power our society, but right now that's more in the realm of science fiction than anything else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
If the universe dictates what the laws of physics are, you can't apply those laws outside of that universe. Since the universe didn't exist to begin with, neither did those laws, so you can't explain what happened unless you were an outside observer which we'd most likely refer to as God.
I don't think we'll ever figure out how the universe was created. No more then a square would ever be able to understand what a cube was. I do think we will be able to learn more about what we can do within this universe though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
As for God, don't look to science for proof of its existence or lack thereof. You won't find a meaningful answer. Science studies the how of creation, it cannot prove or disprove the existence of a creator.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
When you consider the amount of "musical chairs" that goes on between Hollywood and the government some overlap would be expected to occur.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Units
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"The government is lying."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Overlooked disturbing stat
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That damned decimal point
If good news multiply the number by 10 but if bad news divide the number by 10.
As we can consider wire taps to be bad news then we can correct for this Feds adjustment by making their stated value 10 times higher or... 24,270 to... 242,700.
Now to really scare you this is most likely TRUE. If they are caught out they can just blame a decimal point slip on their computer calculation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: That damned decimal point
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
See the thing is, politicians actually lie
... or... Congress has been lying to someone. Why overlook the obvious?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]