The Swedish Experiment: Spotify Helps Recording Industry Make Lots Of Money
from the in-the-pirate-bay's-home-country dept
We've mentioned before that Spotify shows how providing consumers what they want can really have a much stronger impact on "piracy" than any enforcement initiative. Both Spotify and The Pirate Bay started in Sweden, and both got tremendous penetration in the Swedish market. But as various studies have shown, infringement of music dropped drastically in Sweden as the service became more popular. A new report looks at the Swedish recorded music market, and found that it's up an astounding 30.1% in the first half of this year, due almost entirely to Spotify. Digital music now accounts for 63.5% of all music sales, and streaming services (mainly Spotify) represent 89% of all digital music sales. MusicAlly notes that streaming may be cannibalizing downloads, but the massive growth in streaming is more than outweighing the decrease in downloads.This even has the labels (who, yes, have an equity position in Spotify -- more on that in a bit) talking about how they're making more money than they have in a long, long time, thanks to Spotify:
“We’re back to the same revenue levels as during 2004, and if the development continues in the same way we’ll be back on turnover similar to those during the “golden days” of the CD in just a few years,” says Universal Music Sweden’s MD Per Sundin.Now, I've learned to take any claims from the major labels with a grain of salt, and there are some clear issues with Spotify. People have complained that the deals favor the majors so they get a larger cut than the indies. That's definitely a problem. Others insist that Spotify doesn't pay enough -- but multiple studies keep finding that, on a per listen basis, Spotify actually pays quite nicely. There may still be significant issues with how the labels pass that money on to artists, however.
“We’ve seen massive change in music consumption, where music fans are now listening to more music than ever, in an entirely legal environment. This means that revenues are increasing all the time, and artists get paid every time their music is played. Our artists get significant revenues from Spotify, which is our biggest income source for Sweden. A positive side effect is that we’re investing a lot in new talent.”
Mark Dennis, CEO of Sony Music Sweden, makes the same point: “One of the most gratifying consequences of this is that it gives us the opportunity to sign more artists, and record more new Swedish music than ever. In fact, for most of our artists, streaming music now represents the majority of the revenue.”
The point of this isn't to say that "Spotify" is the answer. There are, clearly, some questions about that particular service. But it certainly shows that there are solutions that very effectively compete with free, and as they grow, they can certainly help make significant money for the copyright holders. Spotify, of course, had a head start in Sweden, and the adoption rates there are incredible. However, the point is pretty clear: let new services like Spotify grow and thrive and effectively compete with free, and they will do so -- and the business issues seem to pretty quickly sort themselves out. Obviously having even more competition would be a good thing as well, as competitors will keep trying to offer something even better (and put pressure on Spotify to advance as well).
In the end, though, Spotify is a classic case of giving the public what they want, rather than what the industry wants them to have. And yet, in doing so, it's also now providing massive revenues for the industry -- even as people continue to insist that such a result is impossible.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: digital music, piracy, sweden
Companies: sony, spotify, the pirate bay
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
But for as much as they (or the labels) complain about the consumer's "right here, right now" attitude towards content, they display the same mentality when it comes to getting their money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sorry to burst the bubble...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sorry to burst the bubble...
"Socialist" Europe, by and large, issued licenses, set rates low to ensure there were consumers there and told the licensees they could sink or swim on their own.
Europe and most other global markets continue with the model of here's the license now have fun, here's what you can charge and if you can't make a profit too damned bad.
You do realize that in most places in Africa phone rates are much lower than in North America, don't you? :)
Meanwhile the FCC and CRTC are still in subsidize mode as if, for example, TELUS and Bell Canada need a subsidy in Canada or Verizon and AT&T need one in the States. Both countries are becoming classic cases of regulatory capture.
The funny thing is that there hasn't been a consumer revolt of any notable extent in either country though the issues are the same in each. It's as if we're waiting for the other guy to do it. "Let's wait for the Canucks to take the lead on this one". "Nahhh, we want to wait for the Yanks."
Hint to the folks on both sides of the border. The North American telecom system is a single market and single system. That's why we all have 10 digit dialing, the same standards for transmission and stuff, the same places doing the same network clocking. Two locations in the US and one in Canada..if the system loses one or two, it stays up on the third one.
My only question is, why are we, as comsumers, putting up with this nonsense? Corrupt politicans is a good answer on both sides but there also seems to be this blindness that tells us the FCC and CRTC are there to look after the customers of monster telcos when, in fact, they're in the service of the monster telcos.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sorry to burst the bubble...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sorry to burst the bubble...
That said, some providers do offer spotify packages, and I think that traffic from Spotify on those subscriptions aren't counted. But I'm not sure.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Spotify competes with that simply by streaming what its customers want. All perfectly legal and above board.
As Mike has said over and over again, you can compete with free by living by the mantra of "give the people what they want". And, in this case, charging for the convenience of it all. For the recording industry it pays them handsomely, too.
I'm sure someone will find something bad about it. Look hard enough and you always can. Experience seems to show that it's a win all the way around, imperfectly I'm sure but everything is imperfect.
It seems better than what preceded it by a long shot though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh well, I have unlimited 3g streaming and Pandora, I'm happy with that till a facebookless competitor comes a long. My phones battery life is a bigger issue anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
OK, fine then, I'll download your app after all and search through everything that way. Oh, I can only create an account by linking it to my Facebook account? Sorry, app deleted and one chance of getting another paying customer lost.
I have a Facebook account but the last thing I ever want to do is use it to log into other sites/services. I hate that I even feel a need to have a Facebook account to keep in touch with friends and the last thing I'm going to do is give them more power over me by using them as a form of authentication.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"There may still be significant issues with how the labels pass that money on to artists"
It is not free to distribute money! A secretary at the cost of 10 $ per hour and taking half an hour for each distribution, it is just too bad if you get 5$ to distribute for each cycle. You would need 8 cycles of revenue to keep wage at a 10 % loss if it is even doable in half an hour at that point...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'd just release a huge XML file each month, saying "here's how many times each song was paid, culminating in this amount going to the label". Each artist would be able to say "okay, so the label made $100k from my songs, I can now go to my label and ask for my 25%/50%/99%". And then it's no longer between Spotify and the artists, it's between the artists and their labels.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/06/why-spotify-doesnt-make-sense-for-musicians- 70-000-listens-earns-less-than-300/259136/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
On the big company thing, she is however completely correct, but that is the big 4 for you: Always working angles to gain unwarrented advantages...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wow, talk about drawing a conclusion where it's not merited. Spotify isn't he only reason, there are plenty more reasons out there.
It should also be considered as to what the mentality of the people are. Is what you are seeing actually the longer term effects of the attacks on piracy? While pirate traffic remains about constant ( http://www.thelocal.se/40922/20120519/ ) , I would wonder if in fact the pirate traffic is just a smaller subset of people doing more, while the larger group is slowly moving away from the illegal activity?
Measuring file sharing traffic isn't enough to say if there is more or less pirates out there, only that files are moving.
It looks more like the slow and inevitable move of people away from the illegal activity and back towards the legal side.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]