How The Press Misinterprets Scientific Studies
from the dream-recording-machines dept
There's an absolutely awesome comic by Jorge Cham of PhDComics (which you should read whether or not you're a PhD student) about the science news cycle, in which a nuanced scientific result showing a slight correlation is turned into a causal relationship by the press, leading to a flat out frenzy of others in the press who don't even bother to understand what the original research was about.Click image to see full version
You can see the original Nature story here, followed by the BBC piece that focuses on dreams, even though that's not in the actual research. At least it admits that such things are far, far away. Others in the press weren't so careful. There are plenty of other such reports, but my favorite may be Metro in the UK that claims we're on the "brink" of recording people's dreams, despite that not being even close to true. For what it's worth, it appears some sources, such as Reuters did not parrot the dream recording angle, but plenty did.
It's a pretty good reminder that, especially when it comes to scientific research, you really shouldn't believe everything you read.
Oh, and as a random aside, while this story from Moran is entertaining, it does not come close in entertainment value to this other story that Cerf told at a different Moth event about his life as a bank robber. Seriously. No matter what you're doing today, find ten minutes to watch this next video:
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: brains, journalism, moran cerf, science, storytelling
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
MSM policy
This my policy when reading MSM (which is rare, but sometimes necessary. I assume that what I am reading or watching is:
1 - completely false, or else
2 - some kind of political propaganda (lies mixed with some facts)or,
3 - some kind of commercial/public relations effort (wishful thinking coupled with some lies)or;
4 - a fluff piece or a provocative piece intended solely for getting attention.
In any case I assume that the item:
5 - has not been fact-checked by anybody (since the media believes that there is no difference between truth and lies, what's the point of wasting time and money checking so-called "facts"?)
This policy has saved me a lot of time and energy, not to mention increased my mental health tenfold. I also save a lot of money by not buying newspapers.
This news-viewing policy is published under a CC license and may be used freely by the discerning public.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: MSM policy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: MSM policy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wowser.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
...
...
...
conclusion is erroneous and obviously shill-like, but this one's actually Logical in how it gets there, and shows basic reading comprehension.
do we have some sort of prize for that? 'cause we totally should.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I won't hold my breath
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
2) get accused of being biased
3) provide additional facts in support of conclusions
4) get accused of being a shill
5) ?????
6) profit !!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's not press, it's entertainment
If you want unvarnished science news, then you need to go to publications such as Nature, which as a rule, require a higher intelligence level to grasp.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's not press, it's entertainment
Or foobies(not safe for wok)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's not press, it's entertainment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's not press, it's entertainment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's not press, it's entertainment
The press routinely misinterprets scientific studies, precisely to make them more entertaining.
From my years working in a research lab, I can't overstate how hated journalism was amongst the scientists. Even the best-intentioned reporters got the stories wrong in ways that totally distorted the meaning of the research. As a result of that experience, I simply do not believe news reports of scientific studies. They are wrong.
You can suss out the truth, though, form knowing that the majority of the time the stories are wrong in one (or both) of two ways: either by leaving out or underplaying important qualifiers such as "might," "suggests," etc., or by failing to put percentages into context. "x increases your chance of cancer by 300%!!" is scary, unless you know that your chance of the cancer actually raised from 0.000001% to 0.000003%
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here's the latest example
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/27/teen-pot-use-iq_n_1834392.html
http://content.usatoday .com/communities/ondeadline/post/2012/08/study-pot-use-before-age-18-harms-iq-attention-memory/1
ht tp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-19372456
Typical mistaken, correlation==causation reporting.
Kudos to the BBC for adding the following sentence at the bottom, "She also cautioned that there may be another explanation, such as depression, which could result in lower IQ and cannabis use", but I can't find any other site that has realized the issue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's Show Biz, Folks!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]