Panama's Government One Step Away From Passing The 'Worst Copyright Law In History'
from the Panama's-copyright-office-also-one-step-away-from-a-new-'revenue-torrent dept
It looks as if Panama is set to pass what Andres Guadamuz (Technollama) called the "worst copyright law in history." The 510 Bill grants the Panamanian copyright office the right to pursue filesharers directly and fine them up to $100,000 USD EACH with the money flowing directly back into the copyright office in the form of bonuses for the officials. None of the money flows to the rights holders and those who have been fined can still face civil action from those holding the copyrights.infojustice.org reports that Bill 510 has been approved by the Congress and is now awaiting approval from the executive branch. The Minister of Commerce and Industry, Ricardo Quijano, seemed pleased with its passage through Congress:
[Wi]th the implementation of this new Act, our country [Panama] is being upgraded within the international and global context.Marcela Palacia Puerta (writing for infojustice.org) queries whether the Minister's statement is correct:
Is the Minister of Commerce right? Are the international standards implemented by this Act? This Act gives extraordinary power to the administrative organism in charge of the registration, storage, monitoring and inspection of copyright, allowing it to impose fines on infringers, violating the general principles of law as “non bis in idem” and “presumption of innocence”. Can impartiality and justice lead a process of imposing fines, when the beneficiaries of the fines are the functionaries of the organism itself?Puerta is right. No other country has given the copyright office this sort of unchecked power before. Granting itself the leeway to directly pursue infringers and add the fees collected to the bonus pool is unprecedented. To be sure, "international standards" are being implemented, many of them at the behest of the US government (itself acting at the behest of the MPAA and the US Chamber of Commerce). The worst parts of US copyright law were signed into effect late last year and Panama seems to have taken the "free trade agreement" as a jumping off point, rather than the illogical extreme it actually is.
Rather belatedly, Congressman Jose Blandon asked to make the Act public to "avoid distrust within the population about this law." Well, it's the afterthought that counts, I suppose, but transparency means allowing the public to participate well before the final step of the legislation process. At this point, the bill is two-thirds passed and any input will likely be too little, far too late.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Are we really sure yellow fever was controlled in Panama?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Comparisons with fox news and the copyright lobby are what gives the Black Death a bad name!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
There's no need for that. US copyright holders will simply use Panama as a battering ram.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What - no death penalty?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Yep
Wage Slavery is, again, far more effective than slavery.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But people given the death penalty don't pay you $100,000 to collect in bonuses. Would you rather collect a giant bonus at the end of the year that could make your whole department millionaires, or kill hundreds of thousands of people to discourage others from breaking the law?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Could of shortened the title to...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sound about right. Yup.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Corrupt practices anybody?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Laws like this
If this passes everyone will have to delete all digital media they have and never buy/steal/use/download digital media ever again.
With the corruption certain to ensue with making the gatekeepers the judge and jury like this bill does, over time the chances that someone will be accused (rightfully or not) of infringing approach 100%.
This is a Wargames style ending to the content industry. With laws like this the only way to will be be to not play the game.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Screw You Washington DC.I will not shed a tear as I watch your Empire Crumble.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Darwin's award please.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
(A) actual proof that
(B) a specific individual
(C) infringed (not fair use, authorized use)
(D) a specific copyright work
(E) of a specific rights owner/holder?
Or like the US / RIAA / MPAA is the mere accusation enough to make you a lifetime slave?
Or maybe they are even more enlightened and they don't need no mere accusation. The mere thought is enough.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
That is a more streamlined procedure than having to accuse first, let alone have actual nuisance court proceedings and have to bother with the inconvenience of presenting evidence.
The US already suddenly and mysteriously takes your domain name without your knowledge or consent. Why shouldn't Panama take your money to pay the fine?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
From Article 1: :Esa protección se reconoce con independencia del soporte material que contiene la obra y no está sometida al cumplimiento de ninguna formalidad."
Meaning "This protection is recognized independently of the support material fixing work and it is not subject to any formality"
Therefore they can claim you have a copy of the song fixed in your brain (the proof is that you can sing it without help). (not trying to give them ideas...).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]