Turns Out When Random House Said Libraries 'Own' Their Ebooks, It Meant, 'No, They Don't Own Them'
from the words-have-meaning dept
Earlier this week, we talked about how publishing giant Random House had very explicitly stated that when libraries buy their ebooks, the libraries "own" those ebooks, rather than license them. They left no doubt about it. Skip Dye, Random House's VP of library & academic marketing and sales was explict: "when libraries buy their RH, Inc. ebooks from authorized library wholesalers, it is our position that they own them... this purchase constitutes ownership of the book by the library. It is not a license."This raised some questions, such was whether this was true of everyone else who purchased Random House ebooks. Peter Brantley asked a bunch of questions and finally got Dye on the phone for a discussion, where he learned that when Random House says "own," they mean "not own." In fact, at best, when they say "own" they mean "if you fit into this limited category, you have the right to move your ebooks from one approved platform to another approved platform." This is, contrary to Dye's claim, a license. It is not ownership.
In other words, Random House's claims were a load of bull. That's not surprising, but still disappointing. Brantley goes on to say what kind of ownership should be allowed for libraries when it comes to ebooks:As many surmised, the key phrase in Random House’s communications is “authorized library wholesalers.” In the context of the LJ article, Random House was using a definition of “ownership” that you won’t find in Webster’s dictionary, conveying rights where none exist. In fact, Random will not sell directly to libraries or library consortia, although Mr. Dye reiterated that they continue to evaluate many alternative library business models. RH’s approach in the library market is to vet potential library market distributors for auditing, accounting, security, and other business functions, and then permit libraries to acquire titles from that short list of approved bureaus. In Random’s view, libraries “own” the titles they purchase to the extent that they should be able to migrate their ebook catalogs from one platform, such as Overdrive, to another, such as 3M.
That’s very nice. It’s just not ownership. It’s licensing, with benefits. Library customers of RH titles do not have the ability to transfer their titles to an unapproved platform, such as Califa or Open Library; they cannot resell or donate their ebooks; and there is no mechanism for libraries to receive ebook donations directly from consumers. All that libraries “purchase” from Random House is a verbal commitment to assist libraries in moving their Random House ebooks from one approved commercial platform to another. This is the kind of “perpetual license” that academic libraries have traded for ownership. Academic libraries now employ licensing specialists, and see the world through the lens of contracts. In consequence, faculty have begun to develop open access models that revolutionize scholarly communication from within.
Public libraries seek a different kind of ownership – the kind that appears in the dictionary. The Internet Archive, Douglas County Libraries, Califa, and a growing number of other library systems are running their own ebook platforms, providing their own auditing, accounting, and security. We want to keep ebooks in our communities, run our own services, safeguard the privacy of our users, and be free from overreaching licensing regimes that threaten our services. And increasingly, we are finding publishers who are willing to sell to us directly, seeing the benefits of handing management of digital titles to libraries. Libraries can market e-books to the people that want them, and gather usage statistics in a privacy-protecting manner to help inform other libraries – as well as publishers – about what titles are popular, and where. These are rights and responsibilities that publicly funded libraries should not hand over to commercial distributors that must navigate between the Scylla of publishers and the Charybdis of Amazon. Readers First is an example of the larger movement articulating libraries’ desire to re-forge a partnership between publishers and libraries.Of course, I'd also argue that this goes way beyond just libraries. Users want to own their own ebooks as well, just like they own physical books. That means they don't want to worry about having the company they bought their books from suddenly lock them out of their collection for reasons they won't explain. It means they want to be able to move those ebooks from platform to platform without permission. It means they want to be able to lend those ebooks to a friend. Some smaller publishers get this, provide DRM free ebooks, and make it easy for this to happen. Random House, on the other hand, doesn't seem to understand the issue at all.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, ebooks, libraries, license, ownership
Companies: random house
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Pirates: 1
In the future, I predict people will stop using physical libraries for ebook "lending" rather going to an underground website where you can share your ebooks without any publisher-imposed restrictions.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Just had this conversation
She is the polar opposite to me when it comes to tech and of course I know where to get DRM free copies. I could even strip DRM'd copies. Its just not worth my time or hers to go through the bullshit. So she will keep buying a boat load of used books, reading them, sharing them, then donate them. I am happy with that process.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mike, y u make article supporting Random House, then make article not supporting Random House?!!?!
================================================
Frankly, why can;t these companies just be honest, do they really think the public is stupid enough not to realize they're being disingenuous?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
In other words... "Y u no properly bought and paid for?"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I refuse to be a part of this game they are playing, where there profit is more important than education and bettering the population. I would suggest that nobody buy and ebooks, go on your own personal boycott like me. And if they don't like it they can go suck and egg for all I care about there profits, and I dont care about the authors, if the authors go together and demanded that books were priced at a fair price I would support them but they want more control over there books and they want to charge way more, at a time where sales of books is exploding, with more books sold each year than the year before, where records are being broken every month. No they are making way too much money of of people that are working 9-5 while they laze around writing one book a year or two.
Greed is a two way street, and i believe overpricing an ebook is just as wrong as someone sharing it online, both wrong but one done in retaliation to the other.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Quite an insight
It probably never even occurred to them that there might be other aspects of "ownership" that are important to their customer base. Myopic.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
To ensure that it wasn't lost. To ensure that anyone who wants a book can find a book. I'm a bibliophile, and happened to be in the right place at the right time to watch it happening, but i'm quite certain the same thing plays out every time a community gets disrupted.
All they've done is create a few more people that have gone from ignoring their business model, to detesting it, and being willing to fight against it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Quite an insight
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And now for something completly different...
Just wanted to say a little something to all of the Bay Area people from your friends in the Metro Detroit Area:
Go Tigers!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Quite an insight
I'm not pointing the finger at any specific politician. Lots of them do it. Some more so than others.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
I have to say that being able to point at some of the various odd middle english words in The Canterbury Tales made reading it again a much nicer experience than the first time I did.
Which makes me think that publishers are just sitting thing dumbfounded that they could do anything new. I'll even pitch this idea for free. I'm feeling spiteful though, so I just ask as a favor that as a publisher you fire you're 'New idea' guy for failing so badly.
Why is there not special features in E-Books like there are in movies? A random notation that would quickly and easily bring up the authors opinion or thoughts about a section or point like what's in the commentary tracks for a movie. If I don't want to bother with it, I could simply ignore it because it was an unobtrusive option, but it would certainly add more value to the ebook for some people.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The real problem of course is DRM
Now I can go to Amazon, buy a track or an album, download DRM-free mp3 files. I own those. I have them permanently. I can (and do) put them on my computer at home, my phone, my netbook and my computer at work.
A decade ago it would have been unthinkable that you could buy DRM-free music.
The publishers will come around. It just takes time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mike snookered yet again. -- Though he'll claim wasn't.
ANY little doubts about corporate statements ever disturb your Pollyanna view? Will THIS make you take statements from corporations with suspicion? Hmm? Come on, where's your emotion over being TRICKED and now looking like a gullible FOOL? Where's your outrage over flat-out LYING? Your academic calm is becoming quite remarkable.
Okay, I looked at that closely as possible, and yeah, SEEMED nailed down, so I was tricked too. But I still didn't believe it. At least I learn from my mistakes: I'd like to think that you will too.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Mike snookered yet again. -- Though he'll claim wasn't.
By the way, you can dismiss all my earlier comments stating the complete opposite. Snookered again.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Mike snookered yet again. -- Though he'll claim wasn't.
"Okay, I looked at that closely as possible, and yeah, SEEMED nailed down, so I was tricked too."
"and now looking like a gullible FOOL?" Um that would be 2 gullible fools so Mike & you will have company.
Can you ever not be such a fucking asshole? Rhetorical no need to answer.
I have a great one for you:
http://mimiandeunice.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/ME_522_WhatPeopleThink.png
"At least I learn from my mistakes:" Um... no ya dont.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ownership
I can't be the only one who buys all my books again when I purchase a new bookshelf?!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Quite an insight
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
bonus marks...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Just had this conversation
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I live in Denmark, and recently spent 30 minutes to try and buy an english e-book online.
Found it at 3 different retailers (US, UK, Australia), that refused to sell it to me (add it to the basket), because of my location.
Then found it at 2 additional retailers, that allowed me to add it to a basket, then accepted my credit-card information, before refusing to actually sell it to me.
Then I got sort of mad and decided to break a 15 year old principle on not pirating stuff. Went to google, and had the ebook literally 30 seconds later! 10 seconds later on my device, and I could start reading.
What on earth are they thinking!
Oh, and I then later wrote the agent for the writer in question here in Denmark, and in the UK to offer payment. I have not heard a word from the UK agent, and the Danish one just confirmed that they do not sell the english language version of that writer in Denmark as an ebook.
Fools, really. And, they are probably, as I write this, banging on the door to the parliament, requiering stricter copyright laws.
Fools.
art g again: and the MAFIAA creates another pirate, congrats, dingleberries...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
All the more reason to walk away from Digital
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Get Free eBooks!
Just click my link for a visit Get Free eBooks!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ebook Marketing
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Last Word
“Ownership
Oh come on what's the big deal? It's just like physical ownership. An ebook is like a book, and a platform is like a bookshelf.I can't be the only one who buys all my books again when I purchase a new bookshelf?!