Making The Most Of File Sharing: Free Market Research & A Captive Target Audience
from the cutting-nose-off-to-spite-the-face dept
The demonization of file sharing by copyright maximalists blinds many companies to the fact that it is marketing in its purest form. That's because people naturally only share stuff they think is good, and thus everything on file sharing networks comes with an implicit recommendation from someone. Not only that, but those works that appear on file sharing networks the most are, again by definition, those that are regarded mostly highly by the filesharing public as a whole, many of whom are young people, a key target demographic for most media companies.
What this means is that file sharing is providing some of the most reliable market research you could hope for, because it is totally unprompted -- research, moreover, that is being made freely available to anyone who takes the trouble to gather it. Remarkably few companies seem to have cottoned on to this fact, but one that has is the Australian media giant Fairfax, as reported by TorrentFreak:
At a government broadband conference in Sydney, Fairfax's head of video Ricky Sutton admitted that in a country with one of the highest percentage of BitTorrent users worldwide, his company determines what shows to buy based on the popularity of pirated videos online.
This is such an obviously smart thing to do, you can only wonder at the self-imposed obtuseness of other companies that don't follow suit. And Fairfax's cluefulness doesn't stop there:
"One of our major ways to get content is going to BitTorrent, and other BitTorrent sites, and find what people are illegally downloading to then go to the content owner and say, 'hey, I watched this last night it's going awesome on BitTorrent' and then say 'how about giving it to us?"Fairfax says it also advertises to BitTorrent users, sharing the revenue they generate from converted pirates with the BitTorrent platforms.
Again, this is so obvious -- catching people at the point where they are thinking of downloading unauthorized files and converting them into paying users -- that it's crazy that it's not standard practice. If they weren't so prejudiced against such file-sharing sites, media companies would probably be beating a path to their door for the incredible commercial opportunities they offer. Instead, they keep lobbying for harsher enforcement laws that not only penalize current and potential customers -- never a good idea in the long term -- but that will throttle this flow of unique market research.
"We then bring [the video content] over here and we advertise on BitTorrent that it’s legally available on our platform, and then pay some revenue share based on it. That’s worked quite effectively," Sutton says.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: file sharing, market research
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
but... butt... Pirates!!1!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
/pedantic asshole
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No, you're overlooking rather severe cultural effects.
Anyhoo, what's visible in file-sharing is a quite narrow segment of overall US and world taste. I'm sure to be contradicted, but skimming The Pirate Bay should set you right. In part that's because US pop culture dominates.
Point is file-sharing sites reflect little except US pop culture, so it's not really adequate for market analysis.
Bottom line is that no, file-sharing doesn't really help marketing, particularly if the notion of getting it all for free spreads. Your notions start with the same wacky premise and then you hope to make it true by believing really hard, is all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No, you're overlooking rather severe cultural effects.
Ignorance is bliss.
OOTB is as blissful as they come.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No, you're overlooking rather severe cultural effects.
Lol, that's a good assessment. (I prefer no-voice music myself, classical and videogame)
Just think, if the copyright owners sold access to a torrent they owned, they would have next-to-free data transfer in costs. Of course it would be 99.999% profits, so no more $20 DVDs or $49 games, new.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No, you're overlooking rather severe cultural effects.
If you're into selling country music to people, then the lack of country music on file sharing sites, would suggest that those are not a good avenue to advertise on for your target market.
Oh, and there are many other file sharing sites with different files. Did you search pirate-bay japan in japanese? They may have more Japan pop culture than the US directed english sites. There are many facets to the internet, many of which are limited by languages.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No, you're overlooking rather severe cultural effects.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No, you're overlooking rather severe cultural effects.
I see, but are you actually searching? Or just looking at what's popular? Also, what file sharing sites are you searching? There are genre specific sites, there are general search sites, etc.
See what I'm getting at here? What you find is determined by where and how you look. And not finding something DOES NOT necessarily mean there is a lack of interest in said product.
"In particular, "country" music is almost unknown."
I just looked at a bunch of random sites I've heard of or read about. Know what I found? LOTS of country music. So again, where are you looking and what are you looking for. I found some insanely old stuff, recent releases, and everything in between.
"My guess as to why is that those types don't understand computers."
You know what I call that comment? Projection. YOU don't understand computers, nor people in general.
"Anyhoo, what's visible in file-sharing is a quite narrow segment of overall US and world taste."
If you're a U.S. citizen, yes. However, there are sites aimed at certain areas of the world, which you may not know about based on your location. So again, where you're looking and what you're looking for will determine what you find or don't.
However, whatever is popular in the U.S. or particular global markets will almost always be found on any site in general. This isn't news. (Except possibly to you.)
"I'm sure to be contradicted, but skimming The Pirate Bay should set you right."
You're sure to be contradicted because you're only looking at one site, and because you're usually wrong on nearly every single thing you speak about. As is the case here.
"In part that's because US pop culture dominates."
Actually, no, it doesn't. However, it's easy to see why you would make that assumption.
There is a vast and thriving Bollywood market. Know where you'll find most related movies and what have you? In India. Know where most Bollywood related websites are found in, unless you happen to know about, India.
See, again, you not knowing about something DOES NOT mean it doesn't exist. It merely means you aren't aware of it, but due to your glaring lack of knowledge you present "facts" and make declarative statements about things you know nothing about and couldn't be more wrong about.
"Point is file-sharing sites reflect little except US pop culture, so it's not really adequate for market analysis."
Actually, they reflect much more. A quick trip to any file sharing site and actual searching will show you what people are looking for, a look at the comments will review even more.
Namely, that a large number of things people want aren't available in formats they want them in, aren't available in their location, and for a rather surprising number of products... just not available at all (legally).
That tells you quite a bit about what the market wants, and it's surprisingly not just U.S. pop culture.
"Bottom line is that no, file-sharing doesn't really help marketing, particularly if the notion of getting it all for free spreads."
Actually, it doesn't tell you much if that's all you're looking for/at. "People just want it free." Who doesn't? But it tells you what they want or what they're looking for, again, just cause you can't see it doesn't mean it's not there.
In fact, file sharing sites could be a good market indicator. What is popular? What isn't? What formats are most commonly found/asked for? Etc. All those things are quite helpful in market research. I'm not even in marketing and I realize the importance of all that.
"Your notions start with the same wacky premise and then you hope to make it true by believing really hard, is all."
Again, what we have here is you projecting something that is more indicative/representative of yourself than anyone here, much less Glyn (who wrote the article).
May I make a suggestion? Take your head out of your ass and realize there is much more going on, in general, than you are aware about. Then, realize that your lack of knowledge/insight is nothing to be proud of and get a f*cking clue before commenting and dismissing things, just because you can't see the uses for them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No, you're overlooking rather severe cultural effects.
A relative lack of country compared to say, heavy metal, suggests that yes it is not as popular on the site, and that is market research! If it only represents American views, then you know have excellent American Market research!! If IPs can be used to track pirates (which they can't, but the gatekeepers do so lets follow that logic), then they can even study deeper data and find what is popular in what regions! How is that not US market research?
And given that an Austrialian company is studing this data, they clearly see a market benefit even if only "American Culture" is represented.
He isn't just "believing the same wacky idea", he is pointing you to a direct, real-world example of a way to use "those freeloading pirates" that has only been alluded to in recent months.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No, you're overlooking rather severe cultural effects.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No, you're overlooking rather severe cultural effects.
You sad: "Point is file-sharing sites reflect little except US pop culture, so it's not really adequate for market analysis."
No the point is, once again, that you really have no clue what you are talking about.
Even if one accepts your notion that file sharing on reflects US pop culture, it is still a valid tool to use for *gasp* that market.
Once again, do you even bother to do ANY fact checking?
A quick search of ONE P2P search site shows more than 50,000 mp3s with identified as County Music.
Latest data I have seen shows about 30% of File Sharing is US based. With Germany, other parts of Europe, Asia... all following. File Sharing is world wide, with about 90% of it occurring in developed countries (no real surprise there).
I can easily find Japanese, German, French, and other music on P2P. Here is another big surprise, a lot of other countries like US pop music.
Using your logic, I assume radio, MTV... don't help marketing either, because lets face it, that is a way to listen to music for free.
"Your notions start with the same wacky premise and then you hope to make it true by believing really hard, is all."
May I recommend that you print this out in large type and tape it to your monitor. Make sure you read it every time you think about posting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No, you're overlooking rather severe cultural effects.
This post is not your strongest effort. It's very poorly researched, and you have missed the entire point of what Glyn is saying.
Glyn is taking about picking up TV shows based on international success and using Bittorrent to gauge that success. You're talking about ... country music, for some reason.
The most popular music files on torrent sites are international pop-dance music, mirroring Hot 100 charts. And BBC shows are extremely popular in the US, to name one obvious example of very many.
There is one really obvious explanation for why marketing departments AND lawyers look at Bittorrent. The concerns aren't mutually exclusive. But now I'm arguing both sides.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No, you're overlooking rather severe cultural effects.
I checked around on few file sharing link sites and found that just everything else, it very easy to find unlicensed country music downloads if you know what you doing.
http://www.rlslog.net/?s=country+music&sbutt=Go
http://my.softarchive.net/search/?q=c ountry&x=0&y=0
https://kat.ph/usearch/country/?categories[]=music
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
These companies care about doing what's right! That is why they have to fight piracy, because it's wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Too bad that the **AAs seem bent on suing people who'd rather be legitimate customers than in adapting to the new reality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Those subs are usually better than professional and 100% FREE. More companies need to add up the loss, subtract the marketing they don't have to do, subtract the analysis costs, subtract translator and timer costs and cut out the "middleman companies" with all the lawyer costs involved there and the lawyer costs involved in suing torrenters only to find they are little old grannies with open Wi-Fi. I bet all those costs would make the loss minimal or a wash in the end.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]