Cybersecurity Bill Fails To Move Forward In The Senate (Again)

from the why-did-they-bother dept

As was widely expected, Harry Reid tried to bring the problematic Cybersecurity Act back from the dead today. He needed 60 votes for cloture, which would have then allowed the bill to actually be debated upon (with various amendments considered as well). However, after a few short grandstanding speeches, the attempt at cloture failed, 51 votes to 47, well short of the 60 votes needed. Harry Reid then got up and lashed out at his colleagues, basically saying that he and other Cybersecurity supporters have been spreading so much FUD about how we're going to be attacked that he can't believe Senators didn't fall for it. Of course, one of the problems is that all of the fearmongering failed to actually identify the problems or threats other than to handwave about planes falling out of the sky and similar fanciful stories. Furthermore, it fails to acknowledge that rushing through a bill that has significant impacts on privacy of the public -- especially at a time when people are increasingly concerned about government snooping -- is a bad thing. Reid admitted that the cybersecurity bill in this Congress is likely "dead," though I'm sure something like it will be revived before too long. How about next time, rather than rushing it through and ignoring civil liberties, the government actually highlights the specific regulatory problems already in place, and why this bill is needed -- and does so while including civil liberties advocates in the discussions?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: cloture, cybersecurity, harry reid, senate


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    A Dan (profile), 14 Nov 2012 @ 3:55pm

    They're still waiting

    We know they have it all prepared, and are just waiting for the "Cyber-9/11" to push it through. I wouldn't necessarily push for evidence of need, because it encourages them to manufacture or allow a catastrophe.

    (Some believe that happened with the true "9/11". Regardless, we shouldn't encourage it.)

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    vegetaman (profile), 14 Nov 2012 @ 4:13pm

    Blazing Saddles

    "We have to protect our phoney baloney jobs here, gentlemen! We must do something about this immediately! Immediately! Immediately! Harrumph! Harrumph!"

    *flash forward to after cloture vote failed*

    "I didn't get a 'harrumph' out of that guy!"

    *repeat the above, ad infinitum*

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      harbingerofdoom (profile), 14 Nov 2012 @ 5:26pm

      Re: Blazing Saddles

      HARRUMPH!!

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      gorehound (profile), 14 Nov 2012 @ 6:13pm

      Re: Blazing Saddles

      FRAK YOU HARRY REID !
      We Do Not Want To Lose More Rights A-Hole !

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 14 Nov 2012 @ 7:18pm

      Re: Blazing Saddles

      harrumph? We don't need no stinking harrumph!

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 14 Nov 2012 @ 7:56pm

      Re: Blazing Saddles

      Another blow to the Progressive Authoritarian Statists, just wait until Harry changes the filibuster rules, that will show then obstructionist constitutionalists.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    PlagueSD (profile), 14 Nov 2012 @ 4:31pm

    Whatever happened with "The Government of the people, by the people, for the people."?

    Oh, I know...Four score and seven years ago, Corporations weren't people. I get it!!!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 14 Nov 2012 @ 7:52pm

      Re:

      I thought the whole point of corporations is that they were as an individual under law, thus shielding the owning individuals from the faults of the corporation.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike Masnick (profile), 14 Nov 2012 @ 10:48pm

      Re:

      Apparently Obama already managed to pass this a month ago:


      No. We wrote about that too earlier today, and that's different. That's just for the military and doesn't cover the same stuff at all.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Pixelation, 14 Nov 2012 @ 6:34pm

    Is anyone certain that Harry Reed isn't a zombie?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Nov 2012 @ 7:49pm

    Candy Gram For Mongo

    Candy Gram For Mongo

    Sign Here Please

    Mongo Likes Candy

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Nov 2012 @ 1:47am

    Yes, and I'm sure Congress will forever pretend that Google's business model- one that is based on avoiding taxes, monopolizing internet search and making its money off content it didn't create- isn't incredibly dangerous and antithetical to the concept of a true free market economy.

    A concept the US bases its economy on.


    Oh yes indeed. This current scenario will absolutely live on forever into infinitum.

    Oh happy days for everyone in Silicon Valley :)

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Nov 2012 @ 5:21am

    another case of a politician more concerned with having his name associated with some imaginary bill rather than no bill at all. if the same politicians were as concerned with real life issues that try to remove freedom and privacy from the people in the US and elsewhere by trying to bring in Fascist-like measures, it would be a much better choice

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.