Domain Shakedown: Companies Warned About The Dangers Of Unprotected .SX
from the ugh dept
Ever since ICANN announced plans to allow tons of new top level domains to enter the market, many have recognized that this was nothing more than a money grab -- as companies would feel compelled to buy up "their" names to keep them out of the hands of others. What's amazing is that TLD operators are barely even hiding this in their marketing material. Lauren Weinstein recently received a "pitch" from the operators of the new .sx domain. .sx isn't one of the new "generic" TLDs from ICANN, but rather is a newish TLD from Sint Maarten (an "autonomous country" from within the Netherlands) similar to various other "new" TLDs built off of lucky country codes (such as .tv, .ly and .co). However, the marketing message for .sx is really quite incredible. Basically, they're saying .sx is quite similar to "sex" and, gee, you wouldn't want your brand associated with sex, would you?Dear *******If this feels mighty close to the traditional "nice business you've got there... wouldn't want anything to happen to it, now would you?" approach, that's because it's pretty clearly the idea behind this line of marketing. Pay up or something un-family-like might show up near your brand.
We would like to inform you that the Landrush Phase of the new .SX extension of Sint Maarten has now closed and will be available next Thursday, on November 15th, 2012 in the final phase called
General Availability
> From that date, you will be able to register .SX domain names on a first-come-first served basis.
We would like to emphasize the importance of the .SX extension that can be confused with or misspelled from the word
sex
registering your trademark or company names as domain in the extension may thus protect your image and prevent from confusion with the adult industry.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't we already have laws for that?
After all, as Techdirt continually reminds us when trademark infringement suits are abused, the whole point of the idea is to prevent customer confusion. If someone were to actually attempt to build a site with the clear purpose of causing such confusion, it would be an open and shut case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't we already have laws for that?
For example, Microsoft.sx could be a grate site for say... small strap-on dildos. Now it would not be infringing on trademark so long as they made it clear they were not associated with the software maker and that instead they were making their own "software".
Embarrassing for Microsoft? Yes, Infringing? No
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Don't we already have laws for that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Don't we already have laws for that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't we already have laws for that?
If I created a company called Microsoft that didn't compete in software/hardware, but instead porn, then it's not trademark infringement, so long as I don't try to parody the logo enough to be considered "confusing".
Now it could get sketchy if a porn site popped up called Harvard.sx and had girls wearing Harvard Uni clothing or somehow attempted to associate with the other entity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't we already have laws for that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Six Sex
I think that the average person doesn't even know about the .sx extension. If someone wants Microsoft or Ford, they are most likely to type .com
But it does seem like a S(limy) X(torsion).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Six Sex
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If they're a subdivision of the Netherlands, then they should get .sx.nl or whatever. Is that really so inconvenient?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Be protected
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Mike Masnick, Porn King!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Register sx Domains here...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]