Google Asks People To Speak Out Against ITU's Attempt To Takeover Internet Governance
from the speak-up dept
We've been covering how the UN's International Telecommunications Union (ITU) has been moving forward with its plans next month to consider a number of proposals to takeover aspects of internet regulation and governance. There are, of course, a number of different proposals being submitted by different countries. The problem, of course, is that the setup of the ITU is not open to the public, and there are some special interests involved -- mainly by countries with oppressive governments looking to use this as a way to gain control over the internet for the sake of censorship, as well as local (often state-run or state-associated) telcos using the process to see if they can divert money from successful internet companies to their own bank accounts. While the ITU likes to present itself as merely a neutral meeting place for all of these proposals, what's been clear for a while is that the ITU leadership has taken an active role in encouraging, cultivating and supporting some of the more egregious proposals.Some of this is due to the way in which the ITU leadership views the internet. Some of it is due to an organization that realizes its own mandate is obsolete and it really serves little purpose anymore, so it's coping by pretending its mandate is much broader, but doing so in a way that shows it has little understanding of the internet other than "something we want a mandate over."
This seems to be one situation where, in the US, pretty much everyone is aligned against this effort. Politicians and companies -- including telcos, tech companies, service providers and more -- are all quite worried what an ITU-governed internet would lead to (mostly funds being diverted from innovative companies to stagnant players and a much less open internet). But the US has only one vote in the upcoming WCIT event where many of these proposals will be reviewed. ITU boss Hamadoun Toure pretends that the public has a voice in this process, but ridiculously shut down the public commenting tool on the ITU's website before telling everyone about it (nice trick, that).
However, if the ITU won't let the public comment, there's nothing preventing the public from speaking out elsewhere. That is, after all, one of the amazing wonders of the internet, which the ITU refuses to understand: it's a tool of communication and expression. Along those lines, Google has revamped its "Take Action" page to urge people to speak out about the whole ITU/WCIT process which will be kicking off on December 3rd.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: internet governance, itu, open internet, un
Companies: google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Sometimes I wonder if these trolls really believe what they're saying or if they're just seeking attention. No rational person reading this site would think Mike Masnick is recieving any payment for his posts here. So you're either not rational, not a person, or you're not actually reading this site.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Which Mike himself already stated.
Lies do not become true if you repeat them enough.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nah, let's talk about Google's attempt to take over.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nah, let's talk about OOTB's attempt to take over.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Nah, let's talk about Google's attempt to take over.
Please think before you type.
You are starting to sound like a crazy person, maybe the screws on your foil hat need tightening?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Nah, let's talk about Google's attempt to take over.
Everyone knows that if Google took over, they'd do a better job than any government could.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Nah, let's talk about Google's attempt to take over.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wow, that sucks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wow, that sucks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hang on, hang on...
First off, the ITU manages, and enables cooperation on managing, scarce global resources, such as the cross-border radio spectrum and satellite orbit assignments. Secondly, the international phone network and related standards (e.g. facsimile) are still around and will remain so for some time to come, and these need to be able to inter-operate. The ITU manages those standards. Thirdly, they manage or co-manage the standards for many of the interesting Internet-based standards which affect telecommunication, including VoIP, DSL, ISDN, PSTN/3G, ASN.1, X.509, JPEG, MPEG, and many others. They also oversee global namespaces such as IMSI and ASN.1 OIDs.
Yes, these could be offloaded to other groups. The "EG"s which created JPEG and MPEG, for example, are actually joint committes from ISO/IEC and ITU. However, ITU is one of the faster-acting standards bodies, which gives them a distinct advantage. All too often, de facto standards are only codified after the event. The ITU is very good at getting these things moving so that interoperability can happen sooner than if it was left up to groups like ISO.
Yes, I think this is a power grab, and likely a highly counter-productive one; the last thing the world needs is adversarial standards bodies. That can only end badly.
But it's wrong to think that the ITU's mandate is obsolete. On the contrary, it's more relevant than it's ever been.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hang on, hang on...
I speak from experience - I was for many years a Rapporteur in ITU-T (I was chair of one of those joint ITU - ISO/IEC committees).
But when it comes to anything with serious political (vs. technical) weight behind it, they're pushovers - their paymasters are the government Members, and they do as they're told. ITU is NOT someplace you want in control of your civil liberties.
I signed Google's petition this morning.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hang on, hang on...
In case anyone didn't get it, here's the tl;dr version: There are many problems with ITU, especially this cynical power grab. It could certainly do with some reform. But it is not obsolete.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Something worth protecting against any possible corruption
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They claim Russia jailed Pussy Riot for a YouTube video, but they were arrested before even leaving the scene of their performance.
I agree with the message but intentional misinformation annoys me. It's terrible enough not to have to mislead people. Besides, this is likely to touch a nerve with most Russian audience, who then will be less likely to take action, perhaps because they'd feel it looks like US propaganda.
Really disappointed by this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ITU-T has tried and failed on a technical basis before
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I Will never trust the UN
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unions
[ link to this | view in chronology ]