United Airlines Sues Passenger Complaint Site Untied
from the really-now? dept
I had really thought that we'd reached the point where lawyers working for large, well-known companies recognize just how incredibly stupid it is to file lawsuits against websites that criticize them. Sure, a decade ago or so, it was common for big companies to go after so called "sucks sites" or "complaints sites," often alleging trademark infringement. But, at some point, many of them realized that (a) trademark complaints were a dead end since there was no confusion and (b) that these lawsuits only drew a lot more attention to the sites in question. Apparently, however, there are still some throwback lawyers working for United Continental, and they've decided to go after a popular passenger complaints site that goes by the creative domain Untied.com.Untied has been around for fifteen years -- so you'd think United would be used to it. However, apparently they got pissed off that Untied redesigned its site to look something like United's current design. The top image is the Untied complaint site as it looked recently (it has since added some more features to make it clear that it's not actually United's site). The bottom image is United's site:
No matter where this falls legally, however, I can't see how this could possibly make sense from a business standpoint. The end result -- win or lose -- is going to be that a lot more people become aware of Untied, and are likely to think of United as being a big bully against the small guy helping passengers who had bad experiences with the airline. Of course, some of the details may be in the actual filing, which doesn't seem to be public yet. The lawsuit was filed in Canada, and the docket page doesn't have the actual filing yet. Oddly, however, it does claim that the case is about patent infringement. I'm going to assume that's a data entry error somewhere, however...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: complaints sites, streisand effect, sucks sites, trademark, untied
Companies: united
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Looks legitimate to me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Looks legitimate to me
So people are purchasing tickets for airtravel from Untied Airlines now.
What does Untied Airlines fly anyhow? A fleet of Cessnas? And these poor folks all thought they were getting tickets for flights on a modern jet airplane.
Yeah, looks cut'n'dried.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Looks legitimate to me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Looks legitimate to me
If untied.com takes advantage of the confusion and starts their own airline, I'd say you are right. Until then, I won't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Meanwhile, off topic but a thousand times more important:
Drudge Report has a dozen items more important than United/Untied, Mike. How about the Germans going after Google for taxes?
I get an hour's worth of news in a week here. Try harder.
Support Mike "Streisand Effect" Masnick's proprietary interest!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
He innovated the term all by himself! He alone! It's HIS!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Meanwhile, off topic but a thousand times more important:
You're that asshole in the grocery store bitching that the free toothpick samples aren't hot enough.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Meanwhile, off topic but a thousand times more important:
No, he's the asshole trying to get people who take the free samples arrested for shoplifting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Meanwhile, off topic but a thousand times more important:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Meanwhile, off topic but a thousand times more important:
Are you serious? That pos rag is worthless drool.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Meanwhile, off topic but a thousand times more important:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The new Untied design may not be infringing, but ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It'll be interesting to see how the Streisand Effect plays out here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That said, it does remind me of that commercial that featured a basketball decorated to look like Luis Vuitton. As I recall, LV won that one, so I guess United figures it can afford to roll the dice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Wikipedia informs me that Canada moved away from the “moron in a hurry” test in their 2006 Supreme Court decision Mattel, Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
outdated screen shot
Thanks,
- Jeremy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: outdated screen shot
Anyone taking two seconds to look at your site as shown above would realize this is not the United site. Maybe this actually IS about patent infringement, and they think you copied some patented element of their page?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: outdated screen shot
I'm more curious why this was filed in canada. Are you based north of the border?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Some even point out that United have misspelt "United" on the website! :-P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Though, I think that blows the whole "moron in a hurry" test out of the water. They still aren't a competing website.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I know a lot of folks that click on anything they see so as to get to what they want to see faster.
I can see United Airlines winning this one, specially if they can show that people got confused and believed they were complaining to them and not to somebody else, which apparently some folks did in fact do it.
Nonetheless the website could just change its color scheme, format and all would be well, or they could put in big a. letters that they are not involved with United Airlines in any way.
It is sad that they may have to change though, United Airlines should be using that webiste as a sensor to improve themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Survival Situation
You were in an Untied Airlines Cessna. It done crashed. Badly.
The pilot and copilot are dead, but you and your classmate are unharmed. The flight plan specified a 3-hour sightseeing tour over "North Pole", but doesn't indicate whether that's the geographic north pole or magnetic north pole. You think the advertising for the tour might have been misleading, 'cause before the plane took off you didn't even know were different kinds of north poles. You think you crashed about half an hour after the pilot pointed out an abandoned DEW-line station on the ground. Since then, you've been flying at "cruising speed" and the sun has been shining in through the copilot's window.
You have 15 items with which to survive:
1) A magnetic compass
2) ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Poor Internet sports and bad legal advice
Won every one. Losers had to pay attorney fees. For other yummy Internet stuff see me @Rockmedia. But for aviation stuff, see Gerald Sterns. On Tumblr. Or at www.trial-law.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]