Colombia's SOPA Struck Down, But For Procedural Reasons

from the better-than-nothing dept

Back in April last year, we wrote about Colombia's own SOPA, the "Ley Lleras 2" copyright bill (it's version 2, because an earlier attempt to pass it failed.) This was rushed through by the Colombian government using an emergency procedure so as to have it ready as a grovelling welcome gift when President Obama came calling shortly afterwards.

A challenge was mounted, and the Constitutional Court has now returned its verdict. The good news: the law has been struck down. The not-so-good news: it's for procedural reasons, as infojustice explains:

the Court declared the unconstitutionality of the entire law due to procedural irregularities incurred in Congress because the law was processed in the Second Commission of Congress, like an international treaty, but not as the internal implementation of an intellectual property law which the process should have been carried out in the First Commission. Furthermore, the 1520 Act was processed as an ordinary law and not as a statutory law.
Obviously, it would have been better had the court struck down the law due to the numerous problems with its measures, but as Sean Flynn points out:
The Court's action provides the opportunity for Colombia to revisit these issues and produce a more balanced outcome for Colombia's citizens and businesses.
So even if the law is by no means dead, this latest decision does at least mean that civil groups have another chance to ask for a full and fair discussion of the measures and their impact on Colombian society. Let's hope their government listens this time.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: colombia, copyright, ley lleras 2, sopa


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 25 Jan 2013 @ 5:16pm

    What this means...

    Their courts know how to punt too.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 25 Jan 2013 @ 6:02pm

      Re: What this means...

      And those who were involved will soon be replaced.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That One Guy (profile), 25 Jan 2013 @ 6:41pm

    Somehow I get the strangest feeling that there will be a whole lot of 'we will take that under advisement' a good number of 'donations' made, and the thing will probably end right back on the books, with nary a change made.

    After all, if they were willing to trample all of the citizens' wishes and right the first time, I doubt they'll hesitate doing so this go around either.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 26 Jan 2013 @ 8:15am

    SOPA was never about due process. Is it any surprise that even when getting approved, SOPA and its inbred cousins refuse to follow proper procedure?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Jan 2013 @ 6:54am

    First Pass

    The court had no reason to even look at the contents of the bill, since the procedure was so clearly aberrant. Further, had they struck it down on reasons drawn from the bill itself, it would have legitimized the process by which it was signed, which would be far worse.

    The bill can still be reviewed, even if it does get through the process again, and then rejected on its own merits. There is no bad news here.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.