Cybersecurity Executive Order Actually Respects Some Privacy; So Do We Actually Need CISPA Any More?
from the an-improvement dept
Exactly as predicted yesterday, President Obama talked about cybersecurity in last night's State of the Union address, including his plan to sign an executive order on cybersecurity. What's a bit surprising is that the executive order... is actually pretty reasonable. Unlike some earlier drafts, it appears that the White House actually took the privacy concerns fairly seriously. Most of the executive order focuses on the government sharing "threat info" with companies rather than with companies sharing info with the government. There is some support for companies sharing information back, but with some clear privacy standards. As always, how this works in practice will be more important than what's written down now.That said, this raises a pretty big question: if this is in place, why do we need CISPA (or any other cybersecurity regulations). Well, to be clear, this doesn't raise that question -- that question has been out there all along. Our biggest concern with all of this talk about "cybersecurity" is that no one ever seems to explain why it's actually needed, other than vague threats of evil bogeymen hacking away at our computer systems. But they've never shown what current laws are a problem and what important information sharing is currently blocked because of existing laws. Furthermore, they haven't explained what the real risk we're facing is. The Hollywood inspired stories of evil hackers taking down airplanes make for nice visuals, but have little basis in truth. So now we have a document that lets the government helps companies if there is a real attack. Why do we need anything more?
CISPA, in particular, doesn't seem to add anything of value to what's already in the exec order, other than trying to free up companies from any possible liability when they hand over your info to government agencies based on vague standards concerning "threats" (and then those government agencies can then use that info for pretty much anything). So rather than focusing on legislation, why not watch how well things play out with this executive order in place?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cispa, cybersecurity, executive order, president obama
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
why?
Because the gub'ment killz terrists. Anyone who tries to take our guns is a commie. We need ta protect the chilluns.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The natives are getting restless is not a politically acceptable answer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Because the government has trouble justifying itself without a serious threat to the country. There hasn't been a serious threat to the country since the Soviet Union collapsed, so now we have fear propaganda and imaginary villains.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Respects our Privacy? Have you read Sec 5?
Here's my take on it.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/12/executive-order-improving-critical-infras tructure-cybersecurity
Sect 5(a) Federal Agencies self-police that they're in compliance w/ Fair Info Practice Principles.
Sect 5(b) DHS agencies shall assess civil liberty risks and make a report available to DHS Secretary (but not us).
DHS agencies shall self-assess and add their results to Secretary's report (that we can't see because it'll contain classified 'annex').
Sect 5(c) DHS agencies shall have a chat about the report with Civil Liberties Oversight Board and Office of Management and Budget.
Sect 5(d)Info that is submitted in accordance with 6 U.S.C. �133 shall be protected from disclosure except where any one of a countless number of laws can potentially be applied to nullify those protections.
And then there's 6 U.S.C. �133
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/6/133
6 U.S.C. �133(a)(1)(A)Prevents the Gov from responding to FoIA Act requests about our data.
6 U.S.C. �133(a)(1)(D)Allows a number of things to be done with our data as long as whoever harvested the data signs an agreement (which is certain to be submitted to them).
6 U.S.C. �133(a)(1)(E)Clams down on non-Fed Governments, thus reducing chance of accidental oversight.
6 U.S.C. �133(a)(1)(F)Insures that Gov-granted corporate privileges remain unaffected.
Et cetera.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Respects our Privacy? Have you read Sec 5?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Metaphor time
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Metaphor time
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We do not need either.
Also we do not need a statist dictator to issue proclamations from on high.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I personally don't think so. This SHOULD have been dealt with through the legislature. There's some failing in the system that this was required. It purely luck that it happened to be beneficial to the people.
Blame the industries, or the Tea Party (most people I know note that the Tea Party has pretty much made the legislative branch useless, at least until the Republicans win an election) but the answer is not in executive orders its in legislation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Last Word
“Because the government has trouble justifying itself without a serious threat to the country. There hasn't been a serious threat to the country since the Soviet Union collapsed, so now we have fear propaganda and imaginary villains.