Crowd Funding: Also A Method For Proving Marketability To Investors
from the in-the-pudding dept
As crowdfunding sites like Kickstarter continue to be a rising trend in content production, there's an important lesson that both successful and failed attempts can teach us all. That lesson is that the turnout for such a project tells the producer everything they need to know about the combination of the saleability of their project and their ability to properly market it. In fact, Mark Cuban recently came out in strong support of crowd funding, going so far as to suggest that every startup should be required to do a Kickstarter campaign."It's a way for you create demand and sell the product without giving up any equity. That is a compliment to what an investor might do. In terms of PE (price to equity), there are strategic investors and then there's just money. I'm not a big fan of money investors, which is what most angel investors turn out to be, because they just want their money back. I try to be very strategic, I try to add value, or I don't make the investment."It's a great way to look at things, but I wonder if we can take it a step further. There is no reason that a Kickstarter project cannot also woo more traditional investors. This is all the moreso if the Kickstarter campaign takes off like a rocket. Why wouldn't an investor want to back a project that has shown it is both in-demand and managed by competent business folks? Serving as one example of the ability to do this, not to mention the leverage such an approach provides content creators, is Chris Roberts, developer of the Star Citizen game, which was wildly popular on Kickstarter.
“We’re still doing investment,” Roberts explained to RPS, “but I’m going to be a bit more picky in choosing it, and I’m getting to dictate the terms better. I’m saying, ‘You guys have to realize about making the game as good as possible. No forcing us to go public or to sell out.’”Far from well-known conditions of corporate or investor interests forcing an early release of a game, or nixing important but difficult to create aspects of one (ahem, Mass Effect 3), this diversification of backing dollars protects the creator and his or her vision for their creation. There are still going to be stipulations under which an investor may hand over their cash, but the control over the creator is mitigated by the other sources of funds.
Beyond that, Chris explains how crowd funding can be a great proving ground to current or new investors.
"It’s actually funny. Everyone I lined up is basically over the moon. Your big risk as an investor is, “I’m backing this thing. Does anyone really want it?” At this point there’s no question that people want it, and maybe a lot more than anyone was expecting."What does this mean in practical terms? Well, far from the the caution some issue that crowd-funded projects will naturally be lower-budget cousins to their corporate largers, being able to attract money from multiple sources, including a wider internet public, could make for huge budgets in games, films, and music. I would suggest creators heed Mark Cuban's words: crowdfund, both for the money you can generate for your product, but also to prove to traditional investors that you're going to be successful.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: attracting investors, chris roberts, crowdfunding, entrepreneurs, mark cuban, market research, star citizen, validation
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The fact that it sticks it to the major record labels is a very nice bonus.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Here is one big change I would make to Kickstarter at the moment: if a project gets its initial funds, allow for funds to still be collected even after the deadline. This way people will very quickly realise that the more pledges, the higher quality stuff will come out as a result. Trailers, singles, concept art etc can encourage more pledges even after the initial receiving of funds.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Crowdfunding rules
Unfortunately, the rights morass is such a tough pit to crawl out -- the inability to "undo" a century of bad deals and poorly defined authorship (particularly in music) and rescue any sort of viability from the once-unstoppable strategy of exploiting catalog. That's the real issue that deserves more attention than file sharing. We can't pretend to solve future copyright problems if we can't clean up the mess we already made.
I think eventually not much will change in the copyright world -- the powers are to large and entrenched -- and crowdfunding will slowly but surely take over as the primary way content creators are compensated. The authorship problem is not immediately solved by crowdfunding, but it's a powerful way to circumvent the so-called "protection" of copyright that often turns into a prison, both for authors of the work and new authors that require use of the work to spur new creativity.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
needs a [sic]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Everyone who pledges to Kickstarter is basically buying a refundable admission ticket.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ö
No details but conduct like I am feeling and living will not be accepted respect and kARMA is big
Leonor Arango .(Do no Harm)@2013
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Feb 21st, 2013 @ 1:31pm
I would rather die then work for a distructive Capitalist firm. Blocked for protest 9 Months. where is my Country. UCLA Dean is flying around to the tune of 600k read confirm This Town by levowitz it all there. leonor arango Unsure of my future. 08-5-13
[ link to this | view in thread ]