Spain Considers Making Digital Copyright Law Worse: Pleasing The US Again?
from the never-ending-story dept
We wrote a couple of weeks ago how some were arguing that Spain ought to go back on the "naughty" Special 301 list for failing to show any "positive developments" on the copyright front recently. By an interesting coincidence, the Spanish Internet Association has just published a leaked draft of proposals to make digital copyright law in Spain even harsher. Here's how the Web site ADSL Zone describes them (original in Spanish):
The new proposals have a clear intention: to amend the Criminal Code to allow criminal prosecutions of Websites that provide links. According to the leaked document it will be an offense to provide ordered listings and categorized links to protected content, developed for this purpose and involving an active and non-neutral maintenance and updating of those lists.
Interestingly, Google wouldn't be affected by the new law according to ADSL Zone, nor would "occasional links" be prosecuted. Of course, everything would then hinge on what "occasional" meant in this context.
There's also the following proposal:
Second, the paper seeks to limit the concept of private copying. This will require us to be in possession of the "original media". This is really incompatible with the current reality, since there are legal platforms like Spotify or iTunes where you do not have that "native support".
The concept of "original media" is meaningless in the digital realm, where files are copied many times as they traverse the Internet, or as people move them around on their storage media. How on earth would you prove that your digital copy was "original"?
Finally, there is a suggestion for making the copyright levy system not only worse, but in conflict with current EU plans to rationalize it:
no matter whether we copy or not, whether or not we have the "original media", the fee will be charged in any case.
In an age where storage media are becoming ubiquitous -- if Samsung's refrigerator is running Android, it must have storage -- such levies are anachronistic and harm innovation, so Spain's plans to push on with them is one more indicator that it's heading in the wrong direction. The big question, of course, is why it is doing this: is it simply the usual story of lobbyists' privileged access to government ministers who aren't interested in whether the new measures are fair or even effective? Or is this once more the heavy hand of America reaching across the water to put a little pressure on its Hispanic friends...?
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, criminal, links, spain, special 301
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Both.
I'm hoping the Spanish will put some fight against this idiocy. I wonder how they'd feel if Google managed to get a levy instated so they'd have to pay a levy every time Youtube played their content for fucking free. Or everytime Samsung devices were used to play their damned content. Morons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmmm... there's no decent online equivalent to Netflix or Hulu in Spain and the last one I'm aware of that tried to be set up had the subscription option removed due to licencing problems. Netflix have expressed a desire to open a Spanish site, but plans were put back due to licencing difficulties. The offline rental market is pretty much non-existent in most areas, the postal service is atrocious and makes a physical Netflix equivalent unworkable (you'd be lucky to get 2 discs in a month reliably). I see people buying pirated DVDs off street vendors every day, though. When and where legal physical media is available it's often much more expensive than elsewhere in Europe (a new videogame can be up to €90 compared to €40 if imported from the UK) to the point where even Spanish people I know often import rather than buy from Spain. This all in a country with massive youth unemployment - the people who are usually considered most likely to spend all their disposable income on entertainment.
But yeah, we just need to attack the internet, that will totally work! In reality, the people I know who have stopped pirating recently did so because the combination of Spotify + VPN service + Netflix/iPlayer/Hulu I pushed on them services their needs totally. Of course, the morons in charge of the industry then don't realise that legally paid-for traffic is coming from Spain, so all their tiny mind can perceive is "we're losing sales! It must be piracy!".
"it will be an offense to provide ordered listings and categorized links to protected content"
So if a site just randomly posts links in no particular pattern it will be cool, right?
"This will require us to be in possession of the "original media"."
*sigh* So, not only would they be completely wrong-headed, they're also making it illegal to use legal services that don't conform to 1996 reality? I know these morons are stuck in that timeframe, but is it seriously that difficult to understand market realities before attempting to pass laws?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If that wording is a correct translation, they are trying to outlaw iTunes etc. Such sites carry protected content, that is under copyright to the labels.
Are they trying to totally outlaw the Internet?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
"If that wording is a correct translation"
The original is below, although it is just a report rather than the document itself. I'm not 100% fluent in Spanish, but that seems to be the correct translation unless I'm missing an important nuance somewhere.
"Según el documento filtrado se considera delito facilitar listados ordenados y clasificados de enlaces a contenidos protegidos, desarrollando a tal efecto una labor activa y no neutral de mantenimiento y actualización de dichos listados"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Also, i would not be surprised if such a law was also intended to force Google into filtering its results.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Spain is not the Coastal del Sol. It really is much bigger than that with most of it stuck in the 1930s. That is not just attitude but also infrastructure too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
"That is not just attitude but also infrastructure too."
Got a citation, or are you just talking out of your ass again? Most major cities have far better infrastructure than where I live, but still suffer the same problems.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A lot of young folk and older people are out of work and broke in Spain.
So, the Authorities think they will force people to pay out money they don't have to begin with.They will threaten their Population with stronger Laws and Penalties.
The Youth should rise up and show the Establishment just what they think.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The law would specific acts with conscious organization...
"... be an offense to provide ordered listings and categorized links to protected content, developed for this purpose and involving an active and non-neutral maintenance and updating of those lists." -- This sounds like a start on showing actions by site owner plus knowledge of the contents = criminal intent to infringe a copyrighted work.
And yet again, WHY do you guys complain when won't affect you 'cause you're not downloading any infringing content?
You're now complaining about specific and knowing acts that clearly have sole purpose of facilitating infringement. You need to turn back from your sheer pro-piracy, anti-creator course, and at least start writing as though you're looking for legal solutions.
"In an age where storage media are becoming ubiquitous -- if Samsung's refrigerator is running Android, it must have storage" -- This is NOT innovation, it's senseless weenie gadgetry. You kids don't even know the magic that makes refrigeration work, but if there's a computer stuck onto the front panel, it must be "cutting-edge", huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The law would specific acts with conscious organization...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The law would specific acts with conscious organization...
Reading comprehension fail as always. He's telling that the storage in the fridge would be paying that ridiculous levy..
ootb take your head out of your own arse, the lack of oxygen is not healthy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The law would specific acts with conscious organization...
The Avengers blu-ray comes with a digital copy I can load on an iPad/iPod/etc.
How do I prove it wasn't posted on the Internet, boy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The law would specific acts with conscious organization...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The law would specific acts with conscious organization...
That is something nobody ever would be able to pin on you blue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The law would specific acts with conscious organization...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm guessing that officials in Norway are going to propose extending digital "rights" soon...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In other words, there's no real challenge to my assertion that changing the business models is the only way to change the actions of "pirates" - and I can show it works. I invite other challenges from non-morons, but be prepared with facts - I am, so don't come unarmed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This just in...
tags instead of
tags to avoid copyright infringement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This just in...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]