DailyDirt: Food -- What You See Is Not Always What You Get
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
These days, it actually takes some effort to find food at the grocery store that contains fewer than five ingredients. Processed foods contain so many ingredients that it might be better to just avoid them altogether. But even when you think you're getting "whole foods," they may actually contain hidden ingredients. When did food get so complicated? Here are a few things that will make you think twice before you decide to eat something.- Potentially harmful ingredients that have been banned in other countries around the world are still legal in the U.S. What's worse is that many food companies have already reformulated their products to be safer for the foreign market, but they continue to sell Americans the "original" versions. [url]
- Olive oil, milk, honey, and saffron are the most commonly adulterated foods. The U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention has created a database of more than a thousand cases of food adulteration from 1980-2010, noting what the foods were mixed with, and providing links to press reports and scientific papers on each case. [url]
- Some people choose to eat organic food because they think it's more nutritious, but studies seem to suggest that the health benefits are minimal. Buy organic if you have deep pockets, want to avoid ingesting small amounts of pesticides, and want to support more environmentally friendly agriculture, but don't be fooled into thinking that it's necessarily more nutritious. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: adulterated, food, healthy, ingredients, nutritious, organic
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I only eat inorganic foods...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
People are wrong.
Organic food contains more poisons than non-organic.
Bacteria and other decease from organic fertilizers, and poisons from fungus and that the plants themselves produce when stressed or harmed.
Properly handled conventional farming methods have the potential to be better than organic in all possible ways.
I'm not saying this is done. There is no market for it today. That market i dominated by the "organic".
If there was a market for environmentally friendly and poison free food, that's what we would get. Now we get organic. Organic is not environmentally friendly and poison free. It's "natural" and free from synthetic poisons. Plenty of natural poisons in it. And the natural way of growing it is not necessarily the most environmentally friendly way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"If there was a market for environmentally friendly and poison free food, that's what we would get"
Nice try Monsanto rep
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah, those commie socialists over there in the EU doing all their freedom hating banning of yummy ingredients. Thank goodness the good ol' us of a does not force detailed identification of all ingredients in the food you eat. Otherwise food producers might have to work a little harder and get less profit - oh the horror.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bans
Regulatory approvals and bans follow statutory procedures and are (allegedly) based on scientific evidence. One confusing problem is most people do not understand that "dose makes the poison" or almost all substances can be poisonous under certain circumstances. Substances normally consider poisons generally are toxic at very small amounts - teaspoon of arsenic or thallium is toxic to an adult many times over but the same amount of sugar is not.
The real question is not "Is it toxic?" but "How much is needed to kill someone?". Related is how much is in food products if one eats a reasonable amount.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bans
Personally, I seem to have an adverse reaction to GMO tomatoes. Not heirloom tomatoes, just the GMO ones. I was told flat out by a poster on an Ars entry about Monsanto & their GMO products that I was wrong to want labeling on all GMO foods, it should be okay to sell GMO tomatoes without a label because it is believed that they only adversely affect a very, very small percentage of the people who eat them and it cost to much to label everything for just a few people. By "adversely affect", I assume he meant anaphylactic shock, which can kill you, which is what happens to me, but really, we have no idea how these things affect anyone in the long term, and the general population should not put up with being set up as a corporation's guinea pigs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
File this under the "I want my time back dept"
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/transfats/
http://classes.soe.ucsc.edu/cmp e080e/Spring05/projects/gmo/index.htm
Your welcome...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]