If You're An App Developer And Concerned About Patents (You Should Be), Here's An Event For You
from the don't-miss-it dept
There are tons of app developers out there who are quickly discovering that there's a major risk they face today: if your app gets even remotely popular, you're a likely target for a bunch of patent trolls who are feeding off of the greater app developer ecosystem with incredibly broad patents for obvious concepts (even things like charging for your app). There's a relatively new group called the App Developers Alliance that is putting on a series of patent summits across the US to discuss issues related to patents and app developers. I've had a few conversations with the folks putting these events together, and they look like they should be fantastic resources for those who can attend.Software patents present significant challenges to app developers. Vague claims, product life cycles shorter than the PTO review process, trolls and general uncertainty threaten to stifle app industry innovation and growth.You can check out the site to see when and where the various summits will be held.
Beginning in April, the Application Developers Alliance will host events nationwide for developers to learn about patents and share stories of Lodsys letters, legal strategies and litigation costs, and their ideas about software patent reform.
Each event will feature an expert presentation/overview, followed by a panel discussion between policymakers, app developers, attorneys, and other stakeholders. Events will include an open Q&A and a networking reception.
Disclosure: Techdirt and the App Developers Alliance are discussing a sponsorship/advertising deal. That promotion is separate from these events and, as always, this post is editorially independent.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: app developers, developers, patents, software patents
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Ambiguous parse
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Promote apps and let the alliance fund your web page somewhat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Someone infiltrate and LIBERATE THEIR DATA!
Or is there something deservedly proprietary about this data?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Someone infiltrate and LIBERATE THEIR DATA!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As for the article itself, I actually look forward to see what might come out of the events.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Big Brother Protection
Considering that the market place to sell these apps are closed systems under the platform creators control.
It's about time the platform creators started offering inbuilt patent insurance to app developers. That way a teenage kid can still create tomorrow.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Base your applications on the research efforts of the 60's, 70's and 80's
Their is so much that was published and are all good leads for new applications. Most of my stuff is based on the research done during the late 70's to the mid 80's.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Base your applications on the research efforts of the 60's, 70's and 80's
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Base your applications on the research efforts of the 60's, 70's and 80's
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Base your applications on the research efforts of the 60's, 70's and 80's
We used to do little things like joining two terminals in different parts of the country and having remote conversations with little trouble other than initiating the connection protocol from each terminal. Connecting two applications was quite easy as well.
At any rate the point is that there is still much of what was being researched then that we can still use today with great effect and have all the prior art available to us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Base your applications on the research efforts of the 60's, 70's and 80's
Also remember that on a network, using a distributed system, or a mobile system are magic words for getting a new patent on old ideas.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Base your applications on the research efforts of the 60's, 70's and 80's
A jury (in such cases) can be be difficult to judge as to what logical outcome they will follow but at least you have got a good start.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's just sad
Well, we have health insurance, auto, property, and malpractice insurance why not patent infringement insurance? Software developers could contribute to a central fund in case their apps become so popular that they are attacked by trolls. It's just sad that this even needs to be considered.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's just sad
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's just sad
It would be sad that the cost of software development was also driven up because like doctor malpractice insurance -- its existence is to feed the trolls.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What sort of idiots
Internet is WORDWIDE, remember? HOST YOUR APP STORE IN P2P, RIGHT THERE IN THE PHONES. No software patents applied or enforced there. I'm way past caring about all the poor idiot 'Murrican devs and businesses who can't figure out the meaning of jurisdiction. WHEN THE SOLUTION IS JUST THAT BLINDINGLY OBVIOUS.
But it's "forbidden" because you have to "comply" with "regulations"? Why? Come on, try and stop the bits, BRING IT ON. Internet CAN and DOES take on censorship and WIN.
Reality doesn't care for laws, because it's made of things that still exist when no-one believes in them. Laws stop existing when no-one believes in them. Bits exist, I've seen them, but I've never seen a regulation pop up in my TCP packets.
As for "but devs could be raided" : hahaha lolno. They'd have to raid all of everyone who ever downloaded the Android Dev Toolkit or XCode. And all the publishers, i.e. everyone who owns a phone/tablet/whatever. GOOD LUCK WITH THAT.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Violation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
more dissembling by Masnick
By far the bigger issue for small firms is protecting their creations.
“Patent troll”
infringers and their paid puppets’ definition of ‘patent troll’:
anyone who has the nerve to sue us for stealing their invention
The patent system now teeters on the brink of lawlessness. Call it what you will...patent hoarder, patent troll, non-practicing entity, shell company, etc. It all means one thing: “we’re using your invention and we’re not going to stop or pay”. This is just dissembling by large invention thieves and their paid puppets to kill any inventor support system. It is purely about legalizing theft. The fact is, many of the large multinationals and their puppets who defame inventors in this way themselves make no products in the US or create any American jobs and it is their continued blatant theft which makes it impossible for the true creators to do so. To them the only patents that are legitimate are their own -if they have any.
It’s about property rights. They should not only be for the rich and powerful. Show me a country with weak or ineffective property rights and I’ll show you a weak economy with high unemployment. If we cannot own the product of our minds or labors, what can we be said to in fact own. Life and liberty are fundamentally tied to and in fact based on property rights. Our very lives are inseparably tied to our property. Large multinational corporations are on the brink of destroying the American dream -our ability to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps from the working classes by building our own companies while making better futures for our children and theirs.
Prior to eBay v Mercexchange, small entities had a viable chance at commercializing their inventions. If the defendant was found guilty, an injunction was most always issued. Then the inventor small entity could enjoy the exclusive use of his invention in commercializing it. Unfortunately, injunctions are often no longer available to small entity inventors because of the Supreme Court decision so we have no fair chance to compete with much larger entities who are now free to use our inventions. Essentially, large infringers now have your gun and all the bullets. Worse yet, inability to commercialize means those same small entities will not be hiring new employees to roll out their products and services. And now those same parties who killed injunctions for small entities and thus blocked their chance at commercializing now complain that small entity inventors are not commercializing. They created the problem and now they want to blame small entities for it. What dissembling! If you don’t like this state of affairs (your unemployment is running out), tell your Congress member. Then maybe we can get some sense back into the patent system with injunctions fully enforceable on all infringers by all patentees, large and small.
Those wishing to help fight big business giveaways should contact us as below and join the fight as we are building a network of inventors and other stakeholders to lobby Congress to restore property rights for all patent owners -large and small.
For the truth about trolls, please see http://truereform.piausa.org/default.html#pt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Content ownership rights.
In my opinion it really just isn't worth the hassle. The system is so hopelessly broken now that lots of people are waking up to this fact and deciding not even to bother trying to work with it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]