Solution: The Copy Culture Cryptic Crossword
from the filling-in-the-blanks dept
Last Saturday, I posted The Copy Culture Cryptic Crossword, just in case there were any cryptic fans in the Techdirt audience. It turns out there are quite a few, including at least one AC who almost solved it in less than 24 hours. All in all it was a great response, and while I can't promise regular cryptics on Techdirt, I will definitely try to put another one together in the not-too-distant future.
But, for now, it's time to reveal the solution to last week's puzzle. The completed grid is below, followed by a list of answers. I've used some basic notation to show how the answers were arrived at wherever it's easy to do so in a self-explanatory way; as for the rest, I'll answer any questions (and accept any criticisms for sloppy clue-writing) in the comments! One reasonable concern was already raised, which is that BMG is not quite a "collection society" by definition, and on that one I offer a mea culpa.
![The Copy Culture Cryptic Crossword Solution](https://i.imgur.com/aBjR0wh.png)
1. Kick start (4)
BOOT
3. Right after six, America gets infection (5)
VI+R+US
6. With acknowledgements, reveals modification (4)
HACK
8. Collaborated on and bragged about bad grade at bad church (12)
CROW(D+SOUR+C)ED
10. Software publishers initially bemoan slow adoption (3)
BSA
11. Television standard is oddly not a sect (4)
NTSC
13. Terrible prefix and terrific prefix for the obsolete (4)
DINO
15. Note measurement for collection society (3)
B+MG
16. Cultural commons remixed old iambic pun (6,6)
PUBLIC DOMAIN
17. Activists cut short, shortly (4)
ANON
18. Amended drier amendment (5)
RIDER
19. Bully sacrifices rights for a fee (4)
TOLL
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Cryptics more common in Britain (I think?)
The slightly baffled might like to refer to some of the internet guides on (I would say, normal) crosswordshttp://solving-cryptics.com/
http://www.gptucker.net/crosswords/solvinghelp.htm
An d if you're prepared to get hooked
http://puzzles.telegraph.co.uk/site/crossword_puzzles
gives access to a decent cryptic
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Crossed words
I myself am brain and pain overload and i am only interested in one love one life... So have at another word play game im outtie.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Crossed words
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Crossed words
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Nevermind. I forget this is the internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
No... I didn't get most of the clues either, but unlike you I don't suffer from an inferiority complex, so I can still understand why a lot of people find them fun and challenging.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
What we are commenting on is THIS "cryptic" crossword, if you can call it that.
We did not say cryptic crosswords are stupid or weird, JUST THIS ONE.
It appears when your not good at something, then you just post it at TD.
I am not an American, I don't have the US level of "understanding" you have.. fortunately.
I no I don't really give a shit where you come from.
I agree, in general a good cryptic crossword is a please to do, a good crossword.. this one is simple really bad.
Very bad, even for a first effort.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I'm starting to see why you feel fit to shit all over this attempt, darryl. Your command of the English language remains atrocious. Do they really not teach you proper spelling in Australia or is that just you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cryptics more common in Britain (I think?)
http://solving-cryptics.com/
http://www.gptucker.net/crosswords/solvinghelp.htm
An d if you're prepared to get hooked
http://puzzles.telegraph.co.uk/site/crossword_puzzles
gives access to a decent cryptic
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cryptics more common in Britain (I think?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'm with that AC. :) A little more explanation, please.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
that is all they are saying. it is SO BAD, that even after being provided with the answers people cant work out your 'logic and reason'.
People can only conclude that it's YOU at fault, who are unable to construct a crossword..
The term "total failure' comes to mind;
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A full explanation of clues would be nice
For instance:
1. Kick start (4)
BOOT
Ok ... a bouncer may boot (kick) an unruly patron from a club, and you must boot (start) your computer before you can use it. That makes sense.
8. Collaborated on and bragged about bad grade at bad church (12)
CROW(D+SOUR+C)ED
I see how 'Collaborated on' is synonymous with the correct answer CROWDSOURCED. And I can see 'bragged about' (CROWED) a 'bad grade' (D). That leaves SOUR+C somehow equating to 'church'. I don't get it. Am I missing something?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A full explanation of clues would be nice
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A full explanation of clues would be nice
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: A full explanation of clues would be nice
CROWED = bragged, which goes "about" (around) "bad grade at bad church"
bad grade = D
bad = SOUR
church = C
thus...
CROW(D+SOUR+C)ED
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A full explanation of clues would be nice
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: A full explanation of clues would be nice
Mostly I try to minimize the use of those types of one-letter abbreviations in cryptics, since I often find them annoying. But, they exist for a reason... and that's one of the clues where one slipped in.
Don't worry, you won't catch me using "sailor" to mean "AB" or any of those other weirdly obscure ones -- those drive me nuts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Code Breakers
And they are very challenging and require a particular type of mindset, so they tend to be most popular with "intellectuals" - many of the most famous code-breakers during the second world war were excellent at solving them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"Terrible prefix" = DINO, quite literally (dino- as a prefix means "terrible", derived from greek)
Then "DINO" is also a "terrific prefix for the obsolete" in a less literal sense, merely a suggestive one
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Dean (Dino) Martin
2) is the Dino 206 GT car, then the Dino 256 GT and the Dino 308 GT4
also plenty of references to restaurants.
Also as most here are Americans, a Dino is some place you stop to get a coffee and a mean.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
face it leigh, you are fucking hopeless at this, please NEVER do it again..
better yet, stay from all things technical or intellectual. It's just not your thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ANON "
except, Anonymous (group) are HACTIVISTS...
not activists.. HACTIVISTS..
you cant even get the answer right Leigh !!!!
once again, you are just not good at this, and one day you might find what it is you are good at..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
FFS, darryl. I know research and truth-telling aren't your thing but this makes it even harder to believe you're a solar panel engineer of a caliber any higher than "shit".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
not activists.. HACTIVISTS..
Hactivists are to activists as squares are to rectangles.
Wrestle with that one for a bit darryl :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What we are commenting on is THIS "cryptic" crossword, if you can call it that.
We did not say cryptic crosswords are stupid or weird, JUST THIS ONE.
"We"? Who are you, Yoda?
It appears when your not good at something, then you just post it at TD.
Like writing grammatically correct sentences? Yep, you're living proof of that fact.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wow...!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wow...!
Now darryl, I have to admit - I too found this a bit beyond me. What I didn't do is turn up on the comments and fling my feces around, bemoaning that fact. By constantly complaining about it, you've only driven more attention to your single digit IQ.
You did not have to even attempt this little puzzle. Since you found it too hard, you then didn't have to screetch about it. Drop it and move on. But no, I forget. This is Techdirt, where the trolls have OCD times infinity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Wow...!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]