AP's Attempt At DRM'ing The News Shuts Down
from the total-failure dept
Plenty of people rightly mocked the news a few years ago that the Associated Press was working on a plan to "DRM the news." The idea was to put some sort of licensing mechanism together to get news aggregators to pay to promote their news. This seemed incredibly dumb for a whole host of reasons. It added no value. Its only purpose was to limit the value for everyone in the system by putting a tollbooth where none needed to exist. When it finally launched last year to great fanfare in the newspaper world, under the name "NewsRight," we pointed out that, once again, it made no sense. Basically, the whole focus appeared to be on getting bloggers and aggregators to pay for a license they legally did not need.Since the launch... we heard absolutely nothing about NewsRight. There was a launch, with its newspaper backers claiming it was some huge moment for newspapers, and then nothing.
Well, until now, when we find out that NewsRight quietly shut down. Apparently, among its many problems, many of the big name news organization that owned NewsRight wouldn't even include their own works as part of the "license" because they feared cannibalizing revenue from other sources. So, take legacy companies that are backwards looking, combine it with a licensing scheme based on no legal right, a lack of any actual added value and (finally) mix in players who are scared of cannibalizing some cash cow... and it adds up to an easy failure.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: drm, journalism, licensing, news
Companies: associated press, newsright
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Am I not surprised
The dinosaurs do not get the point of encouraging links to their content generates visits and eventually ad revenue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Am I not surprised
Why do hostile globalist elite defend Israel as a Jewish ethnostate with Jewish only immigration, but ravage White majority Europe/North America into a multi-ethnic, multi-cultural Gulag with dystopian non-White colonization?
The world is 93% non-White, only 7% White. But 3rd world colonizers are aggressively advancing their agenda to annihilate gullible Whites, just as China annihilates Tibet.
How long will gullible Whites cuckold for murderous anti-White elite, who confiscate our guns, infiltrate/subvert our banks/FBI/CIA, indoctrinate White kids in academia/mass media, plunder White jobs/wages, & butcher White soldiers in bankrupting wars?
"Native" Americans! invaded from East Asia. Yellow & Brown races committed 10-times more genocide, slavery, imperialism than Whites. Since Old-Testament, Whites have been victims of Jewish/Crypto-Jewish, Turkic, Muslim, N.African imperialism, slavery, genocide.
Gullible Whites should reject subversive ideologies- libertarianism/feminism/liberalism- & reject hostile slanders of racism. Love to all humanity, but White people must organize to advance their interests, their fertility, their homelands. Spread this message. Reading list: goo.gl/iB777 , goo.gl/htyeq , amazon.com/dp/0759672229 , amazon.com/dp/1410792617
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Am I not surprised
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe it's because found other ways:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/business/media/sponsors-now-pay-for-online-articles-not-just-a ds.html?ref=business&_r=0
The strategy of advertisers sponsoring or producing content that looks much like traditional editorial content has become increasingly common as publishers try to create more sources of revenue.
There are definitely sponsored articles here at Techdirt! Are all articles sponsored? Can we trust any information in them? Is Mike's editorial policy and all of his sponsors available for scrutiny? Or does it just not matter because, as fanboys hold, Mike is immune from all scrutiny?
And by the way, that's behind an apparently successful paywall.
Another point is that in clearly cheering this "failure" Mike proves himself a freetard, insisting that all content on the net be free, or set free if isn't already.
Whether advertising can support the net -- when much of it is avoidable with a little knowledge -- is an interesting question with huge implications, but Mike devotes most of his time to tearing down copyright, or complaining about trivia.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Maybe it's because found other ways:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Maybe it's because found other ways:
And you are correct, he has no intellectual consistency whatsoever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Maybe it's because found other ways:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Maybe it's because found other ways:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Maybe it's because found other ways:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Maybe it's because found other ways:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Maybe it's because found other ways:
Or was it like your ususal reading of Techdirt, where you look at the title, and then make up your own story.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you had a choice to spend $1,000 targeting people who are looking for what you are selling, or $1,000 on the shotgun approach that the newspapers provide, which would you choose?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you had a choice to spend $1,000 targeting people who are looking for what you are selling, or $1,000 on the shotgun approach that the newspapers provide, which would you choose?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Repetition the key to success!
Um...Never Mind!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's about time they move completely online (leaving some higher price printed version for those who are willing to pay for it) and monetize on eyeballs and pre/freemium content.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]