Kitchen Nightmares Lawyers Threaten Infamous Samy And Amy If They Talk About Their Experience On The Show
from the hmmm dept
Last week we wrote about the crazy mess that followed the recent episode of the show Kitchen Nightmares on Fox, in which the star of the show, Gordon Ramsay, actually walked away from Amy's Baking Company, after the owners, Samy and Amy Bouzaglo, didn't take well to any criticism. After the episode aired, they were further mocked on Yelp and Reddit (Yelp "haters" were a key part of the episode), and there was an explosion of anger on the restaurant's Facebook page, though the couple insists they were hacked.Following all of this, however, the restaurant announced that it was doing a grand "re-opening" today, which involved a planned press conference and a "job fair" to try to hire 30 new workers. As the show noted, the Bouzaglos apparently have difficulty keeping staff employed for very long. However, the "press conference" has been cancelled. The couple claims it had to do with death threats they received, though it might have more to do with a very different kind of threat: a legal threat from the producers of the show, as reported by RadarOnline.
Lawyers representing the producers of Kitchen Nightmares, Upper Ground Enterprises, sent the couple a letter warning them that talking about the show would be a breach of contract:
We understand that you are planning a public event on May 21, 2013, at which you will discuss your experiences and your "unflattering portrayals" on the show. If you speak about the show without Upper Ground's and Fox's prior approval, and if you disparage the show, its host, or its producers, you will breach your obligations under Paragraph 10 of your Personal Release and Paragraph 14 of your Participant Agreement. These agreements prohibit you from speaking publicly about Kitchen Nighmares, other than to acknowledge "the mere fact of your participation in the Series in personal publicity relating to yourself." Your conduct exposes each of you to liability for liquidated damages of $100,000.Hmm. While this is a reminder to be careful about what sorts of gag clauses you sign before you do anything, it still seems like a highly questionable move by the producers. The more they seek to silence the couple, the more it suggests that perhaps the portrayal wasn't entirely fair. Meanwhile, the more the couple is allowed to stay in the news, the better one would think it would be for the TV show. The couple's actions and statements on the episode were absolutely ridiculous and clearly showed a restaurant/ownership not worth patronizing. Since then, the couple's confirmed statements (even ignoring the Facebook comments, whether or not you believe they were the result of hackers) concerning Yelp have only served to confirm that the couple can't take any criticism and seem to think that bad reviews of bad food are the world out to get them.
The decision to call out the gag order in the contract to silence them seems ridiculous by Fox. Even if the couple trashed the show (as expected), does anyone think that the couple has even the slightest credibility at this point? No one believes them. Pulling out the gag order makes the show look like it has something to hide.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: amy bouzaglo, contracts, gordon ramsay, kitchen nightmares, samy and amy, threats
Companies: amy's baking company, reddit, upper ground enterprises, yelp
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Let 'em say what they want
So let 'em speak and let 'em get sued by Fox and friends. If they are telling the truth, they'd have that truth as a defence....right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Let 'em say what they want
As far as it being a good decision to trot out the gag order,this is the same Fox that wigged out about non-licensed Jayne hats so I'm convinced they really don't understand publicity or want a fan base.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Let 'em say what they want
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No more Fox for me...
No, I won't be on another one. I hope others feel the same.
Good luck doing reality shows when real people won't work with you for fear of litigation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No more Fox for me...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: No more Fox for me...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No more Fox for me...
.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
With the couple of episodes I've seen of the show I wouldn't be surprised if that was somewhat true. Since two of them had kitchens/storage rooms so filthy you had to ask "they've been able to pass health inspections how exactly?".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: KN
Are you able to clarify this? What is your source?
Or is this just gossip?
If you don't know something then it's usually best to keep quiet rather than just make things up for effect. Isn't that part of the point you're trying to make yourself?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
That's why some of them seem like they're there just to make a big enough fuss to get themselves on TV, because they are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I've always thought this was true. It's like they raid the out-of-work (or over-aged) modeling agencies in LA.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
There was never purported to be one, at least in the UK version.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Probably through a negligent or understaffed/overworked state health department.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If they want they can talk about the show while NOT Disparaging the show, without issue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Touch it!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Touch it!!!
It's so simmm-pollllll!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You don't get it
It's funny when the guy who apparently coined the Steisand effect is in fact getting played in the same way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You don't get it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You don't get it
Reading is hard.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: You don't get it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: You don't get it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ROTFLMAO
Free speech, yeah right
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
After hearing the things my kids try to pawn off on me as excuses...
However, if they are well known accross the country, the hit men wouldn't dare expose themselves to this much pagentry.
Naa...they are just a couple of old people determined not to just 'fade away as a nobody'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
https://home-primo.com/russell-hobbs-25111-eclipse-polished-stai
Russell hobbs stainless electric kettle has two colour they are Eclipse polished stainless steel, and midnight blue ombre. The eclipse effect is when the sun and the moon are aligned. The gradual blend of colour creates a blue ombre effects.It has a rapid boiling function.it means it boiled a cup of water 45 seconds (one cup of water means 235ml water). Russell hobbs hot water kettle is very light weight .it is only(1.44kg).Water capacity is (1.7 litters).This electric kettle is (3000 watts).And kettle save up to 66% energy.This kettle height is 24.5cm,length is 22.5cm and diameters is 15.8cm.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]