Taiwan's Copyright Proposals Would Combine SOPA With A Dash Of The Great Firewall Of China
from the overkill-much? dept
You might have hoped that the extensive discussions that took place around SOPA a year or so ago would have warned off governments elsewhere from replicating some of the really bad ideas there, like DNS blocking, but it seems that Taiwan didn't get the message, as Global Voices reports:
The Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has recently proposed to amend the Copyright Act and provide legal justification of IP and DNS blocking at the Internet Service Providers (ISPs) level through a black list system. The government claims that the amendment is to stop the illegal sharing of copyright movies and music.
Of course, as Techdirt readers know, there is no such thing as "obviously violated copyrights" -- that's what judges are for. The idea of of targeting technologies like BitTorrent and FTP is nothing less than an attack on aspects of the Internet itself. And as the article points out, the new powers are almost certain to be abused:
Although IPO has stressed that the Internet service providers will only block overseas online platforms which are "specifically designed for copyright infringement activities" or websites which have "obviously violated copyrights", such as Megaupload, the authorities will target online platforms that enhance peer-to-peer transmission including Bit Torrent, Foxy, and FTP sharing.
If the Taiwanese copyright amendment is implemented, the Island will have a mechanism that blocks and filters away "illegal websites" that host material that infringes copyright laws. This could be detrimental to sites like YouTube, where users regularly upload videos that may violate copyright laws. Although the company has a system for removing these videos, a law like this could lead to the site being blocked altogether.
The new measures will move Taiwan closer to China's Great Firewall in terms of censorship, and will therefore probably be well-received on the mainland as a result. But there are surely better ways of improving relations between the two countries than instituting these kind of measures that won't stop people sharing unauthorized copies online, but will damage the Internet, and not just in Taiwan.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: blocking, copyright, dns blocking, firewall, rogue sites, sopa, taiwan
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Perhaps the real intent is to censor the general public while doing nothing to interfere with their biggest excuse for doing things that most people disagree with.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So, yeah! DNS blocking is close to useless.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Deja vu
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
"nothing less than an attack on aspects of the Internet itself." -- SHEESH. Classic piratey assertion. No, it's countering illegal uses of the internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
Someone points out that you are innocent until proven guilty (that is, you must follow the law): But it's so obvious that the guy is guilty. Just chop his head off already. What the hell are you waiting for? Do it, do it, DO IT!
Double standards much?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
Or for you to speak coherent English, boy?
Your inchoerent rant should read "...it's almost impossible to find an item NOT obviously copyrightED."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
It would take 572 days, 15 hours, 23 minutes and 20 seconds to go through 10 seconds of every single torrent on The Pirate Bay as of a few minutes ago when I started calculating.
That doesn't include download time or time to search or time to read file names.
Who do you propose should do all this? Who would pay them?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
Not even that now - they're magnet links. Literally, a link to somewhere not on TPB's servers. The raving lunatic ootb wants TPB to be held accountable for a direction to somewhere else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
But then, if you only look for abuses of a service that tends to be all you see
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
Whoopsie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
http://thepiratebay.sx/torrent/6419743/Big_Meat_Hammer_Please_Keep_Portland_C lean_and_Unreleased_Stuff
http://thepiratebay.sx/torrent/6389968/The_Transplants_Police_State_197 6_-_1979
http://thepiratebay.sx/torrent/6389952/The_Lynn_Rebels_Gonna_Get_Wasted_LP
http://the piratebay.sx/torrent/6389948/The_GoreHounds_Discography
http://thepiratebay.sx/torrent/6389939/Bi g_Meat_Hammer_Songs_From_The_Dinner_Table_LP
Go ahead and look Mr.Troll ! And take your Meds.You are a creep and a Troll and you are a LIAR !
I own this Art and I have the Right to let the World have it for Free.
Sharing is Caring ! I will never be a Sold-Out Greedy Musician.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
In fact, most of the software I've paid for often doesn't hold a candle to open source products in terms of reliablity & flexabilty.
Of course, the anti-sharing crowd called sita sings the blues terrible but every time I show it to normal people who don't give a fuck about the sharing debate one way or the other love it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
This. In my experience, most of the best quality work doesn't come from the big labels.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
Holy. Carp.
Tell me, do other people always seem like they're moving in slow motion in relation to you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
Kind of telling how it's always the copyright maximalists who insult artists around here.
And they want you to believe they support art?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
Liar. You can find all sorts of legal content. Just becuase YOU don't look for it, doesn't mean it's not there, but then IIRC you already admitted to infringing copyright yourself on one post a while ago.
"Because a glance at file name of recent movie and ten seconds looking at the video will confirm the obvious."
Bullshit. If you think that's all it takes, you just continued your game of whack-a-mole. The pirates will route around your crap quite easily (the file's name need not reflect its contents, for example), while I'm sure you have no problem with the collateral damage for legal content this will cause. Partly because it all has to be automated (it's too big a task for manual filtering), and you people have already shown you don't care about the perfectly legal content you destroy with false automated notices.
"No, it's countering illegal uses of the internet."
While destroying all the legal ones at the same time. Guess why that's not acceptable.
Not even a nugget of truth, as usual.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: For OBVIOUSLY violated copyrights, look at The Pirate Bay.
The file name means less than you might think. A lot of files bearing the name of movies aren't that movie, and a lot of movies don't have a file name indicating the title of the movie.
Also, you can't tell if a movie if a copyright violation from looking at 10 seconds of it. It might have been authorized, or it might have been a legally permitted use of a clip, etc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It was pretty obvious that they were up to no good. Their sites even got splattered with the menacing federal logos and everything.
Except...the cases were dropped after like a year or so, with no explanation or apology whatsoever.
Oops...looks like "obvious" doesn't carry as much weight as it used to...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Fat Bastard is still fighting extradition. The infringement trial hasn't even begun.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
However, Taiwanese people pride themselves in being different from China and mainland Chinese. As a result Taiwanese people have little tolerance for any form of censorship. We have more than dozens of all-news channels for a country of 23 million. Taiwanese are obsessed with information-gathering and being up-to-date on the latest developments, so any censorship implementation will have a difficult time in parliament and will be met with fierce opposition.
I'm curious to see how this will play out but I have my doubts this will be a slam dunk.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So, why did Taiwan and China separate exactly?
-China is where the Communists won, and Taiwan is where the defeated Capitalists fled to after losing. Yet, you'd be hard pressed to find a better place then China with pure capitalism where you can do whatever the hell you want without having to worry much about regulations, or government fines for pollution and such your money making factories cause. So China isn't really Communist anymore.
-Taiwan's insist they have freedom there and China is a dictatorship. While that's true about China, it won't be true for much longer about Taiwan being free if they pass and implement their own Taiwan firewall.
So... if Taiwan insists on becoming more like China, and China already became more like Taiwan years ago... why are they still separate nations exactly?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So, why did Taiwan and China separate exactly?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: So, why did Taiwan and China separate exactly?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Governments are becoming increasingly irrelevant, as multinational corporations slowly consolidate their control of the world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The biggest problem when it comes to online freedom is that most people don't care about it. I stopped counting the times I am perplexed at how little most people know about online privacy - or, rather, the lack thereof - and how often they shrug their shoulders when confronted with the facts that all our online movements are watched by third parties. The answer: I do nothing wrong so I have nothing to fear *rolls eyes*
It is this general complacency that the IPO office is counting on: rarely do these protests have enough critical mass to influence parliament to actually stand up for the rights of the majority rather than the rights of the priviledged. This is true in most countries. The change of heart of the US Congress on SOPA is probably the exception rather than the rule.
While I am cautiously optimistic about the opposition here being strong enough to block this proposal, it is only a matter of time before one comes along that *will* get passed in parliament. The same thing is true in the US, EU, Japan and the rest of the world. These IP/Copyright groups are well-funded and have a longer breath than the protesters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]