Latest Leak: Obama Wants A List Of Countries To Cyberattack

from the but-of-course dept

Fri, Jun 7th 2013 2:29pm — Mike Masnick

Another day, another leak -- and once again, it's not much of a surprise, but rather a confirmation of what's long been suspected. This time, it's that President Obama has ordered the US to draw up a list of "targets" for proactive cyberattacks, as revealed (yet again) by Glenn Greenwald at the Guardian. This is a point we'd raised months ago. For all the talk of "cybersecurity" fears, it's the US that's been the biggest proponent of proactive cyberattacks.

The 18-page Presidential Policy Directive 20, issued in October last year but never published, states that what it calls Offensive Cyber Effects Operations (OCEO) "can offer unique and unconventional capabilities to advance US national objectives around the world with little or no warning to the adversary or target and with potential effects ranging from subtle to severely damaging".

It says the government will "identify potential targets of national importance where OCEO can offer a favorable balance of effectiveness and risk as compared with other instruments of national power".

The directive also contemplates the possible use of cyber actions inside the US, though it specifies that no such domestic operations can be conducted without the prior order of the president, except in cases of emergency.

Again, this shouldn't be a surprise if you're paying attention. Back in February, we noted that the White House had done an internal "legal review" and decided for itself that it had broad powers when it came to cyberattacks.

I'm guessing we're still going to be seeing a lot more big leaks in the near future....

Presidential Policy Directive (PDF)Presidential Policy Directive (Text)

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: cyberattacks, cybersecurity, hacking, president obama

23 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 7 Jun 2013 @ 2:38pm

Fiction
Will someone please remind your resident and government that Tom Clancy wrote fiction, not a blue print for advancing American interests.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Androgynous Cowherd, 7 Jun 2013 @ 2:42pm

I'm guessing...
I'm guessing we're still going to be seeing a lot more big leaks in the near future....

I'm guessing that the Obama administration is about to start living up to its initial hype as the most transparent in U.S. history ... whether it wants to or not.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
apauld (profile), 7 Jun 2013 @ 2:49pm

Tomainia.
The government should get after those bastards quick.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
gorehound (profile), 7 Jun 2013 @ 2:53pm

Re: I'm guessing...
Here's Hoping it happens ! At this point now that the Cat is coming out of the Bag I would like to see the same thing happen to the other side.Now we on Techdirt have long known about this Issue of Tech and Spying, ETC but now the story is all over the World in regular mainstream News.I know I warned people for years now and I bet others here on Techdirt tried to do the same.
Now, I do feel that the Tables should be turned and if I do see the US Gov hacked and cracked it will be Justice and we will see how they spied on us and how they spied on us, ETC.
I do love our Nation but I also love our Constitution and our supposed Freedom.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Jun 2013 @ 2:54pm

so, this is different to the 'alleged attacks by the Chinese' exactly how? this is going to improve relations with anywhere exactly how? this gives other countries the excuse to do the same to the US, so it stops complaints exactly how? all this is gonna do, surely, is give other countries even more reasons to treat the US with contempt especially since this has been going on, unadmitted, for years and either increase or start cyber attacks!!when is it all gonna end? when those that keep condemning the behaviour of others, wipe them all out or when everyone is singing from the same hymn sheet? all countries seem to be involved in this stuff but the USA seems to be the worse. it also seems as if it wants the ability to do what it wants to whoever but whoever mustn't do it back. who the hell is gonna put up with that?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

out_of_the_blue, 7 Jun 2013 @ 2:59pm

Twice in one piece you warn against surprise.
"once again, it's not much of a surprise" ... "Again, this shouldn't be a surprise"

OKAY, already! I'm NOT surprised.

I have more than 50 taglines to select from, and you're wearing this one out:
Techdirt's official motto: This isn't surprising.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
sehlat (profile), 7 Jun 2013 @ 3:10pm

Re: Twice in one piece you warn against surprise.
You're complaining? I'm surprised.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Jun 2013 @ 3:15pm

Re: Re: Twice in one piece you warn against surprise.
I'm not.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Jun 2013 @ 3:18pm

That's it. The US government has officially jumped the shark.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
StayedAtHolidayInnLastNight (profile), 7 Jun 2013 @ 3:39pm

The Independent Republics?
I wonder if this list includes the Independent Republics of California and Texas?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
aldestrawk (profile), 7 Jun 2013 @ 3:58pm

further revelations to come
Glenn Greenwald, working for the Guardian, who along with reporters at the Washington post have apparently gotten a series of leaked documents from a source connected to the NSA, writes today :

"I don't have time at the moment to address all of the fallout because - to borrow someone else's phrase - I'm Looking Forward to future revelations that are coming (and coming shortly), not Looking Backward to ones that have already come."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jun/07/whistleblowers-and-leak-investigations
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Groove Tiger (profile), 7 Jun 2013 @ 4:18pm

Re: Re: Twice in one piece you warn against surprise.
It surprises me that people respond to _blue with sarcasm.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Jun 2013 @ 4:40pm

Re:
Actually, I would say it's even worse then that. Remember, the Government hired, or at least strongly coerced, Hector Xavier Monsegur from Anonymous to attack private corporations after he was caught. In the name of finding other members of the organization, they simply let a few die off in attacks probably even foreign and domestic companies that they felt were worth the risk. Welcome to America: do as we say, not as we do....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
McCrea (profile), 7 Jun 2013 @ 5:26pm

IIRC. Was a couple years ago that the U.S. stated that cyber attacks will be considered acts of war. Looky us, engaging in proactive war.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

horse with no name, 7 Jun 2013 @ 5:33pm

Re: I'm guessing...
I'm guessing we're still going to be seeing a lot more big leaks in the near future

I am guessing that most of what you see will either be carefully edited or created from whole cloth by people trying to discredit the president. Those who oppose him will jump all over anything like this and use it against him to bring pressure.

You know, blog writers who suddenly are all over a story with their political pals like Wyden (wink wink)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Jun 2013 @ 6:01pm

Defense = Offense
We already know the department of defense has nothing to do with defense and everything to do with offense. The Orwellian doublespeak is the norm for them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Anonymous Coward, 7 Jun 2013 @ 7:24pm

Glenn Greenwald
I have a bad feeling about this gentleman's future.

What are the US gobmint's possible responses? Do any of them reek of the ideals the US was founded upon?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
bshock, 7 Jun 2013 @ 8:03pm

obligatory star wars references
President Obama, the more you tighten your grip, the more whistleblowers will slip through your fingers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Jun 2013 @ 9:24pm

Re: Fiction
Maybe Obama is actually Tom Clancy in disguise, if that is the case he'll have my respect once again.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Pixelation, 7 Jun 2013 @ 10:53pm

Cyberattack!
What a great name for a Hollywood movie...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jesse (profile), 8 Jun 2013 @ 12:10am

Re: Fiction
"We need more cybersecurity laws, because after we're done pissing off the world everyone is going to be gunning for us!"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That One Guy (profile), 9 Jun 2013 @ 9:32am

Re: Re: Fiction
The sad thing is, as excuses go that would actually make more sense than the 'terrorists-hacker-communists are going to make planes fall out of the sky!' crap they currently use to try and justify those laws.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Jun 2013 @ 10:10am

Re: Fiction
I've just realized I took the P out of 'your president'.
[ link to this | view in thread ]