How Do You Effectively Manage Customers & Fans Online?
from the service-is-everything dept
The #1 CRM for Small Business
Last week, we talked about the customer management challenge faced by successful crowdfunding projects. That's just one aspect of a broader issue that affects every online business and every creator trying to monetize their work: the more success you find, the harder it gets to manage and maintain that success. Connecting with fans and customers has always been the first half of our philosophy of success on the web, and it needs to be baked in to every business plan from day one.
As part of our sponsorship program with the CRM tool Insightly, we want to get feedback from our audience about the challenge of customer service and management online. We're looking for perspectives from both the business/creative side and the customer/fan side, plus stories of good and bad service experiences (everyone's got a few). Here are a few key questions to consider:
- What changes someone from a first-time customer into a long-term one?
- What's the best way to communicate with customers across the wide variety of channels that they use, from social media to email to good old fashioned phone calls?
- What are the most important features for a CRM tool, and what kinds of other tools do businesses and creators need to manage their customer bases? In the previous sponsored posts, we discussed the lack of CRM features in the backer management tools included with Kickstarter - on what other platforms are creators and businesses going underserved?
Submit your thoughts, stories and responses in the comments below!
This post is sponsored by Insightly. Grow your business and your customers with Insightly, the #1 CRM for small business. Sign up for a free account today »
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: connect with fans, crm, sponsored post
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Congratulations, Techdirt engineers -- once again you've broken something.
I suggest reverting the site software to the state it was in about six months ago. I much preferred it then. 20 articles to a page, no little expander-thingys at all, and strictly chronological display of the articles. Simple, easy, works for everyone, played nice with NoScript and other privacy/security tools, and you could catch up with a minimum of clicking and (waiting for) loading. The changes since then seem calculated to tick off your core audience -- techheads who are very likely to be using things like NoScript. And now the expander-thingys don't even work if JS is enabled.
It's funny, though, how each new malfunction/degradation of the user experience seems timed to coincide with a "sponsored post" appearing, isn't it?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Congratulations, Techdirt engineers -- once again you've broken something.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Congratulations, Techdirt engineers -- once again you've broken something.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Seems to be an awfull lot of "sponsored" post lately....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Congratulations, Techdirt engineers -- once again you've broken something.
Nope. Made no changes to the site tonight at all. Expand/collapse has been working fine for me. Not sure if what you saw was a hiccup, but we'll look into it.
As for some of your other points, we decreased the number of articles on the front page after we received numerous complaints of load times for the full page. The expand/collapse stuff was also due to people complaining that they had to scroll through long articles they didn't want to read to get to the ones they did want. This way you can scroll and *very easily* open up the full article if you want to.
Also, if you want to keep the articles expanded, there's an option for that in your preferences, so if you really don't like the collapsed stories, no problem, you can have it appear the old way -- and that works whether you're logged in or logged out.
So, no, most of these changes have been focused on improving user experience, giving you more choices. Sorry if you don't appreciate them, but we're trying our best to accommodate a variety of ways in which people read.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Congratulations, Techdirt engineers -- once again you've broken something.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How Do You Effectively Manage Customers & Fans Online?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I'm fine with sponsored entries
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Is it just me...
If you scan the front page to check for new posts, stopping when you see the first one you already read, this can trip you up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Step 1
Step 2... don't call it Step2. That dog died.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I'm fine with sponsored entries
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Managed and monetized
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mike you're only proving yourself BLIND!
Nor will it stir up discussion. I'm sure that your fanboys regard the pinning as nuisance, and with lame article and pleas for help, embarrassing because reveals you as clueless, so they don't want to AT ALL encourage you, will just sit it out. Your fanboys won't tell you to STOP this notion. It's counter-productive. -- But I'll be happy if you stubbornly continue looking foolish, and only LESS happy if you wise up and quietly drop it!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Observe, learn, experiment, if the plant is getting all yellow with dark spots it may be because of lack of some nutrient, try epsom salt for magnesium, egg shells for calcium, take some samples of the plants tissue and look it under a miscroscope to see if there are any strange organism there, post the photos somewhere and ask others if they saw something like it before, collect temperature, humidity data, talk to them and try to make every single one of them feel liked.
Is there anything else to be done?
You try, if you fail, you ask somebody who suceeded how they did it or observe what they do it, if you don't fail you can help others.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Congratulations, Techdirt engineers -- once again you've broken something.
Is that the new Valley term for "SEO to suck up to google better"? Perez Hilton did the same thing, but he at least more of less admitted the shorter pages was to drive page views and ad revenue, while lowering the bounce rate on the site.
So for Techdirt, it's the "user experience", but the moves exactly mimic what Google wants for better results. How odd!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Step 1
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Congratulations, Techdirt engineers -- once again you've broken something.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Congratulations, Techdirt engineers -- once again you've broken something.
Now, of course, Mike wsaid "As for some of your other points, we decreased the number of articles on the front page after we received numerous complaints of load times for the full page.", but the real page load issues have not to do with content (which is essentially all words) but rather all the extra stuff loaded in the sidebars, the lower toolbars, and all that other stuff from third parties (who remarkably likely track user actions across various sites, another story altogether). If the goal was to improve page load speed, stripping that stuff out would be a much better way to do - cutting content is just cutting content.
Perhaps you should follow along with the full discussion, and not just the parts you like, you even missed the boss's comments, I guess!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Step 1
However, the FTC rules require these things to be marked and obvious, and judging by the lack of substance in discussion here (and on the rest of both Insight Community and Step 2), the people have spoken and have no interest in this stuff at all, except perhaps for a few of the more notable brown noser types. Otherwise, it's a dead player. Most people understand that they are getting used and just don't participate.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Mike you're only proving yourself BLIND!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You'd probably raise more actual revenue if you came up with better price tiering. I wanted to give you $50/year, but that wasn't easy to do; it was either $15 once or $10/mo. So you got $15 from me instead of $50.
I think you're falling away from your own major drives, the ones that got me to sign up in the first place... engaging your users and giving them something excellent. Looking for ways to make it easier for your primary revenue source to grow, like better tiering, and maybe attractive little perks to go with the tiers, strikes me as much more likely to increase revenue than by cannibalizing your user base to chase sponsor money. From where I'm sitting, that looks very inconsistent with your stated business model.
And don't get me wrong, I'd love it if you were wealthier than Croesus. I don't mind you making money, and I hope you make a lot of it. But these sponsor posts really put a bad taste in my mouth.
Talk about Insight.ly because they are interesting, not because they pay you.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
We've had tremendous success with some of these posts, and others haven't caught on. We're definitely learning and adjusting as we go. Just a couple weeks ago, one of our sponsored posts was the top post on Reddit tech and reached #5 on the front page of Reddit as well. So, sometimes people quite like them.
Also, in the past, we've held similar discussions to this one that have gone quite well and been very interesting, including on topics like enterprise storage, enterprise printing, data models, and the like.
But, yes, this particular post clearly did not catch people's interest, and we're learning from that as well.
You'd probably raise more actual revenue if you came up with better price tiering. I wanted to give you $50/year, but that wasn't easy to do; it was either $15 once or $10/mo. So you got $15 from me instead of $50.
Hmm. Perhaps the organization of the site isn't that clear, but we've always had a lot more options than you suggest, including a $5 month option (http://rtb.techdirt.com/products/watercooler/) and a name your price option, that even has a single check box for $50 (http://rtb.techdirt.com/products/friend-of-techdirt/).
We'll look for ways to make that clearer.
I think you're falling away from your own major drives, the ones that got me to sign up in the first place... engaging your users and giving them something excellent.
Again, as noted above, most of what we've done has worked. Sometimes it doesn't -- and this may be a case where it doesn't, which we're learning from.
Talk about Insight.ly because they are interesting, not because they pay you.
Honestly, nothing in this post said anything about talking about insightly. It asked people to discuss ways to deal with a very real problem that many of our users do discuss regularly. It was sponsored by Insightly to create a general discussion on the topic -- not to have anyone comment about Insightly.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
I would think you would realize after the Step2 fiasco that your audience here isn't into this stuff much at all, you do have a few readers I gather who are in the field, but not that many. More of the readership is in the "f--k the politicians and the **AAs" mentality, which makes it unlikely that they have ever had to deal with a customer at all, except perhaps in the "would you like fries with that" way.
This particular post, while it's in an area you WISH your site was really about, is not what it's about. You are too far off topic for most people. Further, by pinning the post and basically jamming it at people again and again, you make it worse instead of better. People learn to dislike those sorts of things. For the company, perhaps they will understand that these posts don't make them part of the ongoing discussion, and rather makes them stand out in a way that isn't entirely flattering to them.
Nice try to monetize, but not entirely successful.
BTW, have you considered dropping the link to step2 from the top of the pages?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
So, in a world of free, to monetize, you've virtually got to be sitting in the guy's lap, for free, with a smile, and then after the third drink, he'll smile and sigh and loosen his hold on a few dollars more, also for free, and with a smile.
Let's be clear: I'm still for a world of free.
I remember when I was out in Berkeley there was a visitor at the Hoover Institute, a guy who combined his intellectual work there with an interest in the spiritual traditions of the East, and he published in a paper his theory that the true cause of the suffering of the poor, in the West, was that they were just too attached to material things. Nervous strivers, they were.
[ link to this | view in thread ]