Irony: Congress May Declare Today 'National Whistleblower Day' As Court Announces Manning Verdict
from the how-we-treat-our-whistleblowers dept
In a few hours, the court hearing the Bradley Manning trial will be announcing the verdict. I'm sure we'll have plenty of commentary on the eventual decision, but it's worth noting this bit of ridiculousness. Senator Chuck Grassley is trying to get today declared National Whistleblower Day by Congress, in honor of the Constitutional Congress' very first whitleblower protection law, enacted on July 30, 1778. As the article notes, Grassley has worked hard over the years to protect whistleblowers, but we recently wrote about his hypocrisy on the subject, passing a special law for a Swiss bank security guard who did more or less the same thing as Ed Snowden, while bashing Snowden for not facing a trial in the US. Congress just really has a knack for doing the exact wrong thing, don't they? If they want to actually support whistleblowers, they should support whistleblowers, not name a pointless day after them on the very same day that a high profile whistleblower likely finds out that he's going to spend much, if not all, of the rest of his life in jail.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bradley manning, chuck grassley, national whistleblower day, whistleblower
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Declare a day for them, giving them a false sense of security to turn over critical information, and have them arrested and tried for it, with a guilty plea/ruling guaranteed.
This will ensure future whistleblowers keep their mouth shut.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
History says that when the repression ramps up so the ones blowing the whistle come forth. No amount of repression will ensure nothing happens ;)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They are just throwing flashy things for the media to get votes. It's only natural. During his campaign Obama said and promised a variety of things. How much of it came to fruition?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Welcome to Amerika
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
To me there is a big difference
But hey, since they are going to ruin your life anyway regardless of what you release, might as well ruin theirs I guess.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
What!? No enhanced interrogation techniques?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: To me there is a big difference
You forgot a step in Manning's release plan: He gave it to Wikileaks for them to filter out names of people who might be harmed and then disseminate the information to the media. Just as they had been doing for other whistleblowers prior to this incident. That is how the story broke out in the mainstream media after all. Larger news organizations like the New York Times picked up the story and told about the release of diplomatic cables. Then it was Manning that was betrayed by Adrian Lamo who brought everything to the Federal agencies and outed the whistleblower.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: To me there is a big difference
Besides, what (real) harm came to "teh american nation" because of the release of info from 2 wars long ended?
Snowden did it more smartly, with the dead man's switch and all that, but Manning was just as brave.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Welcome to Amerika
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not Irony
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not Irony
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not Irony
Also, if there were issues within his platoon or group, he failed to follow chain rules concerning chain of command in telling his concerns by not reporting it to his immediate superior. You just don't flat out leak information like he did when youre a part of the US Military.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: To me there is a big difference
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Not Irony
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hurrah for Whistleblowers...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Welcome to Amerika
Will you people PLEASE knock it off with this partisan bullshit already. It's not Obama's anything, its the entire American political system. Both Dems and Repubs are responsible for the mess we are in, both groups are culpable and guilty. Trying to pin everything on one man is ridiculous. Even Bush Jr. had Cheny and Rumsfeld and many others helping him ruin what was once the greatest democracy in the world. To lay the entirety of this mess on just Obama shows a stunning lack of understanding of history and the current political climate.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Not Irony
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Not Irony
Furthermore, if the information "put the lives of others in danger," citation please? Name one specific instance where this occurred. Just as the Courts through out the first ACLU case because the ACLU had to show that there was actually harm caused to them, same with this sort of claim. Seriously, name one.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
He might be. I can't know, I'm haven't really been informed about who's in charge.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Not Irony
Irrelevant. It doesn't matter what the law (military or otherwise) defines as "whistleblower". If you are exposing wrongdoing, you are a whistleblower.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Welcome to The Village
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Everyone asking for pardons needs to say "drop all charges" instead.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Not Irony
I'm merely referring to the fact that he leaked information in stead of reporting it to his superiors through chain of command. Whistle blower or not, there's a certain way to blow the proverbial whistle and certain JAG procedures Manning failed to comply with.
The key difference between Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden is that Snowden is continuing to preserve the information that really needs to be classified. Manning leaked EVERYTHING he could find which includes ...troop movements...That information from Manning was not being preserved which is why news agencies outside of Wikileaks rarely reported anything Manning gave them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Irony
In fact when obvious illegalities are taking place in such an extreme nature, the simple act of "reporting to superiors" can get you in deep, deep trouble.
After all, these are acts being perpetuated by your superiors. What would his superiors do with the information? ALSO report to their superiors?
This is why you have whistleblower protection acts. This isn't the same as reporting an infraction of the rules.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Irony
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Irony
Of which the government refused to work with Wikileaks in telling them which documents should NOT be released, or what information should be redacted.
Remember, Wikileaks tried to reach out before releasing everything en masse.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Might I suggest 'Honesty in Politics Day'?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Might I suggest 'Honesty in Politics Day'?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Not Irony
He did go up the chain of command and was ignored and told to shut up.
Manning leaked information that probably put the lives if others in danger.
That's been claimed, but there is ZERO support for it.
His job was to take and execute his orders and let his superiors figure out why they had to give them.
"Just doing my job" is not an excuse if you come across wrongdoing.
he failed to follow chain rules concerning chain of command
He did not. He first ran those issues up the chain of command and was ignored.
Wally, once again, you say things that are factually untrue.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
On the other hand: Keeping someone in isolation for more than 3 years amounts to a far more effective technique if you want to break a human being down. The only downside of the technique is the time-requirement and that is why other techniques are preferred.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A slight change
"National (Lynch A) Whistleblower Day"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Irony
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Not Irony
As far as the change of command issue, his superiors fear losing their positions. While the behaviors need to be reported, the base commander is the one who carries out these problems. The Department of Defense is working up change that pronto...why? I suggested it out of concern for the sexual assault that goes on in the military and nothing been done to those responsible to my Aunt who is now on the DOD's Military Intelligence community after just finishing a tour in Djibouti.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Irony
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Not Irony
Errr, I'M probably earning some Godvin points, but:
*NAZI SOLDIERS JUST FOLLOWED ORDERS*
[ link to this | view in thread ]