Latest Leak: NSA Abused Rules To Spy On Americans 'Thousands Of Times Each Year'
from the boom dept
Throughout the whole ordeal with the NSA leaks, the one line that we kept hearing from defenders of the program was that not only were these programs legal, no one had showed any abuse by the NSA. That is, even if this program was collecting data on everyone, the NSA had those important tools in place to block it from being abused. At last week's press conference, this was a key point made by President Obama. NSA boss Keith Alexander insisted that there was no abuse, while Rep. Mike Rogers, the NSA's prime defender and head of the House Intelligence Committee, similarly insisted that there was no abuse by the NSA. As we noted, that seemed hard to believe, given past revelations of clear abuse.And... the latest report from the Washington Post based on leaked documents shows that an audit of the NSA's activities shows it broke privacy rules, mostly to spy on Americans, thousands of times per year:
The National Security Agency has broken privacy rules or overstepped its legal authority thousands of times each year since Congress granted the agency broad new powers in 2008, according to an internal audit and other top-secret documents.The audit info comes from Ed Snowden's leaks, so it seems rather incredible that President Obama, Keith Alexander and Mike Rogers didn't seem to realize that this audit would eventually come to light, showing that they were flat out 100% lying to the American public.
Most of the infractions involve unauthorized surveillance of Americans or foreign intelligence targets in the United States, both of which are restricted by law and executive order. They range from significant violations of law to typographical errors that resulted in unintended interception of U.S. e-mails and telephone calls.
The NSA audit obtained by The Post, dated May 2012, counted 2,776 incidents in the preceding 12 months of unauthorized collection, storage, access to or distribution of legally protected communications. Most were unintended. Many involved failures of due diligence or violations of standard operating procedure. The most serious incidents included a violation of a court order and unauthorized use of data about more than 3,000 Americans and green-card holders.The NSA's response to all of this is almost comical:
“We’re a human-run agency operating in a complex environment with a number of different regulatory regimes, so at times we find ourselves on the wrong side of the line,” a senior NSA official said in an interview, speaking with White House permission on the condition of anonymity.Well, of course! That's the point that we've made over and over and over again here in response to these claims of "no abuse." The NSA is made up of humans. And when you give humans the power to spy on just about anyone there will always be some abuse. This is why it's important to limit the collection of information, not promise to stop the abuses. You need to make such abuses much more difficult in the first place.
Even worse, this report only covers the NSA's activities in the DC area. Other NSA locations are not covered.
Three government officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss classified matters, said the number would be substantially higher if it included other NSA operating units and regional collection centers.Even a long-term defender of the NSA's programs, Senate Intelligence Committee chair Dianne Feinstein, sounded a bit taken aback by the report, noting that the Intelligence Committee "can and should do more to independently verify that NSA’s operations are appropriate." Coming from Feinstein, that's a startling admission showing that she's finally realizing just how bad this program is -- a program that she's been defending very strongly for years.
The story also reveals the details of the now infamous, but secret, FISC order that had said certain collection practices were deemed unconstitutional by the FISC. Apparently, the NSA "diverted large volumes of international data passing through fiber-optic cables in the United States into a repository where the material could be stored temporarily for processing and selection," and then later admitted that there was a ton of US emails in there and that it was impossible to filter out the Americans. It was only months later that the FISC was fully informed of this and said the practice had to stop.
Perhaps the most ridiculous of the abuses was accidental, but reveals how easy it is to have these surveillance programs abused:
In one instance, the NSA decided that it need not report the unintended surveillance of Americans. A notable example in 2008 was the interception of a “large number” of calls placed from Washington when a programming error confused U.S. area code 202 for 20, the international dialing code for Egypt, according to a “quality assurance” review that was not distributed to the NSA’s oversight staff.And, boom, just like that, a ton of calls from Washington DC were intercepted "by accident" and no one was told about it. No biggie.
So, now, can President Obama, Keith Alexander and Mike Rogers please explain why they lied about the lack of abuse?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: abuse, ed snowden, leaks, nsa, nsa surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Abused and Broken
Let's get this straight. NSA BROKE THE LAW to spy on Americans.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Abused and Broken
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Abused and Broken
And that's just counting incidents. Some of those instances involved illegally spying on thousands of people. In most other crimes, those would count as separate charges (for instance, assault -- if you assault 30 people, you get charged with 30 counts of assault); the NSA seems to consider the number of people spied on per breach as being irrelevant.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Abused and Broken
Sure - I mean, if its good enough for copyright infringement, shouldnt it also be good enough for illegal spying?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Abused and Broken
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Like that's much of an obstruction.
We will make it legal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
dystopia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Abuse police
But they'll damn well try: "We weren't aware of this. We'll have a panel of experts investigating it real soon."
The best is yet to come: the rest of the NSA's collection centers data. How much worse is it than this? Whole lots, I would kinda guess. Millions of people have had their information 'accidentally' accessed.
Frankly, I think it will possibly be the tipping point for the Congress to finally get off their ass and do something substantial-and not look bewildered.
I think it's high time the lies from everyone in the government stop. It's very embarrassing now to be identified as an American.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh, but we can trust Google!
It's just incredible that Mike refuses to apply his own logic to Google, Facebook, and other corporations that get most of their income from SPYING -- and will abuse information so as to glean every cent possible.
Where Mike sez: Any system that involves spying on the activities of users is going to be a non-starter. Creeping the hell out of people isn't a way of encouraging them to buy. It's a way of encouraging them to want nothing to do with you."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh, but we can trust Google!
What information one gives to them is voluntary. The NSA's illegal collection of data from everyone is not.
There is a difference, and I wish to high heaven you'd get it. Please, for your own sanity if not for ours. It's getting old and stupid, your insistence on dragging those names out of your hat every single time anyone posts anything about the NSA's illegal activities.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Oh, but we can trust Google!
OOTB is old and stupid and has not had a clue in a very long time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Oh, but we can trust Google!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh, but we can trust Google!
You say it's evil for the NSA to read some hotheaded Muslim's email to gain info on terrorism, but it's ok for Google to read your emails to spam you with dumb fucking ads.
Uh huh. Yeah, no problem there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh, but we can trust Google!
1. Google' activities vis a vis their users communications are done with consent.
2. Google can't order a drone strike or impose fines and jail time if it doesn't like the contents of your communications.
It's ludicrous that you think the two situations are even remotely similar.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh, but we can trust Google!
Literally nobody here has said that.
Legally and ethically, it is -- because they're doing it with your knowledge and consent. Why is that such a difficult concept to grasp?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh, but we can trust Google!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Oh, but we can trust Google!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh, but we can trust Google!
Also unless Google is doing DPI to collect its data, it's nowhere near as invasive as the NSA.
And as many of the others have told you, if you're so paranoid about Google, don't use it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The intentional abuse is much worse than the unintentional
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the most outrageous part,
What the holy hell? How is anyone supposed to prove anything about an organization which is strictly classified?!? "We can do what we want because everything we do is Top Secret, so you can't prove we're up to no good."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: the most outrageous part,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm a victim of illegal spying. I installed encryption software on my cell phone. Then I got a fake update through my web browser homepage, trying to get me to click on it to infect my cell phone with spyware.
I even checked my homepage settings in the web browser on my cell phone, and the homepage address in the settings was still the same as it's always been, but I was being re-directed, thru DNS redirect, to an AT&T landing page every time I opened the web browser on my cell phone.
So everyone who tries to exercise their Constitutional rights to privacy, using encryption, is having "the contents and the metadata" illegally seized by the NSA, stored and later searched.
They can search it because of the spyware they infect you with.
I know it sounds crazy, but I experienced it first hand. Plus, in light of all we're learning, does it really sound that crazy any more? I hope not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
-----------------
Understand that we still haven't heard all there is to hear about the abuses and misuses of all this spying on Americans.
What we have heard is lies, misdirection, assurances that what Americans fear isn't happening, and the promise nothing will stop these programs other than they might expand.
Almost weekly if not more often once some assurance is attempted to be given, it is again shown it was a lie and it was told with foreknowledge it was such within a day to hours.
This is approaching an impeachable offense for the president and borders on the very things that the latest whistle blowers have been accused of... spying. Only it isn't a foreign government that's considered the enemy just by the actions that have been revealed. It's our own people that are now considered the enemy and they are trying their damnest to cover that fact up. When viewed in this light, all that ammunition that is cheaper to buy in bulk suddenly makes a whole lot of sense in the most evil way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Quit your bitching....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Quit your bitching....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Quit your bitching....
Having a computer do the hard work is part of what is causing the 202 instead of 20 error. That they very much need to put in more checks in their computer-programs is another story.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Quit your bitching....
This is true. However (speaking generally, not about NSA activities specifically) there are some things that if they go wrong can cause so much damage that they simply shouldn't be done at all unless failure is very nearly impossible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Quit your bitching....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Quit your bitching....
But I don't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Quit your bitching....
The inadvertant clause of their policy makes accidental collection into abusive collection.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gaaah! Pre-coffee spelling.
inadvertent
inadvertent
inadvertent
inadvertent
More specifically inadvertently acquired data
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Intelligence Tests for Government Employees
In the US, we have no real tests, and we follow an old practice. First-class people hire first-class people. But our government is run by political appointees, second-class people with second-class minds. Second-class people hire third-class people. Government workers get no respect, and most deserve it.
When NSA screws up, it is working at a level of incompetence that is government-wide. While its violations are criminal, I have no doubt that many are simply due to stupidity. Government Intelligence is an oxymoron.
We should expect no more until the people are ready to do a major house-cleaning.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Intelligence Tests for Government Employees
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Intelligence Tests for Government Employees
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Intelligence Tests for Government Employees
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Obama didn't lie!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So why only Snowden
Why only 1 person in all that time, with all those people ??
You would think if NSA were doing SO MUCH bad stuff, there would be lots and lots of people NOW standing up and agreeing with Snowden..
But there is not !!!!!!
No only one person, who does not even have the conviction to stand up and back up his claims. He's run away to Russia.
Makes you wonder, right !!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So why only Snowden
Also, Snowden has backed up his claims with documents given to the press. Sitting around, getting arrested and thrown in solitary confinement does not back up anything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So why only Snowden
So you want to blame someone for Snowden being forced to remain in russia, look no further than the US.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So why only Snowden
It must be because the NSA is doing a great job.
/s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So why only Snowden
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So why only Snowden
- I suspect there is quite some willfull blindness, it's easy to rationalize bad behaviour
- but most importantly: most people don't like being persecuted, and rather follow orders and do what they are told (and really, given the way the us treats whistleblowers, you can't blame them)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So why only Snowden
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So why only Snowden
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So why only Snowden
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trailblazer_Project
Darryl, it would do you well to educate yourself on the subjects you speak of BEFORE you make a fool of yourself.
So to be as succinct as possible: you are wrong. It isn't "1 person in all that time, with all those people"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google spying not the same
Um, Google may spy on me, but I know it and
1: Can refuse to use their service
2: Can't be thrown in jail Google or Facebook.
NSA I am being spied on with no say in the matter, and they can put me in jail, or at the very least get the IRS to give me a hard time. It isn't even close to comparable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Google spying not the same
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Do not pass go...
And evidently they can and commonly do that.
Scared yet? I am.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Do not pass go...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That explains it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They'll keep lying, to the bitter end
“When I was in Hong Kong, I spoke to my partner in Rio via Skype and told him I would send an electronic encrypted copy of the documents,” Greenwald said. “I did not end up doing it. Two days later his laptop was stolen from our house and nothing else was taken. Nothing like that has happened before. I am not saying it’s connected to this, but obviously the possibility exists.”
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/06/25/greenwald-snowden-s-files-are-out-there -if-anything-happens-to-him.html
Obama, Alexander, Rogers, etc will continue to keep lying because they are certainly not willing to betray further abuses of the constitution and law. They will continue, as was the case before Snowden's leaks, to pretend that all which the public knows already is all that there is for the public to know & be concerned with.
Without a doubt, there are many people in the US gov't working on finding the locations of all copies of these documents (Lavabit's received FISC warrant, for example was definitely part of this effort) in order to recover and destroy them. Thats why the laptop was stolen. If they can somehow manage to get ahead of any further leaks and destroy all the evidence currently outside of their control, then we the public will no longer have any hard, factual evidence of their lies. We will have to just content ourselves with doubting their honesty but being unable to prove it, it will mean the momentum against these spying bastards will die, quickly due to the ridiculous inability of the public to remember anything that the media isn't constantly reminding them of. Not to mention how uesless much of the media is at covering anything of real importance without plenty of hyperbole, dishonesty, and blackouts.
The US gov't plans on getting ahead of these leaks. They will not accept responsibility and back down. They are doubling down. Obama is a prime example, stating the unlimited spying will continue, claiming to welcome a debate which never happens and appointing Clapper to supervise the group supervising the NSA. They have no respect for the concerns of the American people. We are seen in a very condescending light, which isn't entirely unwarranted, and is also not at all acceptable. Under no circumstances will the bad actors in our gov't actually work in the public's favor. We need sweeping change of personnel and an impeachment to get the ball rolling in the public's best interests. Obama and his cronies will not ever act in our best interests, that much should be explicitly clear by this point. To continue to maintain the belief that we can actually expect anything positive to happen without sweeping change is simply hurting the cause. We must be calling for massive reform now, before the public gets distracted by some new thing which has no importance when weighed against the destruction of the constitution and the end of our 'democracy'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NSA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
/Re:So why only Snowden
Not having a moral compass to complain about it is one part of the problem-having the need to earn money is another.
Then there's the idea that perhaps one believes that one is doing the right thing, after all. What's a few bad things when the whole country depends on your work?
"We were just following orders" is a very terrible phrase, but it resounds throughout the ages, and it applies everywhere.
The institutional mindset is tough to beat back. When one is part of a group invested with the so-called 'security' of the country, anything is permissible, even illegal acts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Say that to the ordinary citizen that happens to break the law by a honest mistake. In fact, tell that to those that happen to somehow break TOS agreements and download a large amount of documents. Swartz faced decades in jail for doing absolutely nothing wrong.
High Court, Low Court.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmm?
Who?
They didn't waste their time seeing what you were downloading using your VPN, Masnick, I'll tell you that.
Meanwhile Google is still reading your emails to figure out what ads to bother you with...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
First thing that struck me
"We’re a human-run agency operating in a complex environment with a number of different regulatory regimes, so at times we find ourselves on the wrong side of the line,” a senior NSA official said in an interview, speaking with White House permission on the condition of anonymity."
People are reasonable and lenient when evaluating their own actions and motivations. They know what they intended and this ought to count, they think - a lot. Just an interesting, if expected, contrast to the regime everyone else lives under. Since their PR function generated this and it passed the gatekeepers, we can conclude they have a bit of a tin ear.
I personally think the NSA culture is about what you might expect to arise from people doing that job.
They take their job seriously and don't see it as a kind of game or something that is going to permit itself to be gamed by an overly strict interpretation of law. The consent of the governed depend on the durability and continuance of the underlying civil society. Without national security, they know, there will be no democracy, no governance through consent. From their perspective , those are the threats. From TechDirt habitue's POV, Big Brother and corruption from within are the real dangers to civil society. Both parties are right.
Probably some ironical formulation like "we do our job so well, civilians only have us as a target of anxiety" flashes across the collective mind of NSA.
Unavoidably, they have a bunch of every kind of person employed present, from a bunch of Snowdens to a bunch of Clappers- people who think it's necessary and expected to lie to the American public for national security reasons they aren't permitted to explain. Catching shit for such lying is seen, internally, as a form of falling on your sword.
They have people who have deeply felt political beliefs, that are factually and evidentially challenged and ultimately injurious but which potentially intersect with their jobs in some way and which might lead them to break the law while doing their jobs. Zealots I think they're called.
No matter how we assembled this functionality for society, abuse of some magnitude will occur.
The fact that there IS an internal review process in the form of this audit is significant and either means they realize they're uniquely dangerous or they can't get away from the imposition of the auditors, probably for both technical and cultural reasons.
Even the civilian police don't engage in pre-crime arrests- violations of law will happen first, adjustments in procedures and policies only follow after the fact. The question is, is there real deterrent imposed and how do we know ?
No one wants another Hoover or some form of distributed Hoover in place, a guy who made national policy through blackmail. The question is, how to prevent that and maintain national security. At least laws have to be respected internally. At least.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: First thing that struck me
That's not the only possible downside, so it's not the most basic question.
The most basic question is, essentially, a cost/benefit calculation: how much freedom are we willing to give up in exchange for how much national security?
The real "sin" that was committed is that such a fundamental and important question was decided for us, rather than us deciding it for ourselves. I believe it was decided for us because we would not have made the decision that the powers-that-be wanted.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh, but we can trust Google!
We're not hypocrites for not paying attention to your obsessive need to spam this site.
Time to take your meds, OOB, because it's clear that you're not doing well at all.
Posting as an AC repeatedly should be made a bannable offense, really. It makes you look really infantile.
Referring to yourself in the 3rd person is a serious mental disorder, too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Because it's What They Do!
"Because it's what they do and cannot stop doing it".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A victim of nietz American government
[ link to this | view in chronology ]