Canada Forcing Wounded Vets To Sign Agreement Not To Criticize The Military On Social Media
from the free-speech? dept
Rob Hyndman alerts us to yet another attack on free speech up in Canada. The Canadian Armed Forces are apparently forcing wounded veterans to sign a form promising not to criticize the military on social media. In fact, they're told they should "discourage others in uniform." They're also told not to discuss "your views on any military subject." Not surprisingly, many of those receiving these forms are not too pleased about it. The military claims that it's just been designed to "educate" veterans. The statement to the Ottawa Citizen is quite incredible:
In an email to the Citizen, the JPSU denied that the creation of the policy and document was designed to stifle criticism of politicians and senior military staff. It was created “in an effort to educate our members and personnel on what constitutes the appropriate and inappropriate use of social media and the possible ramifications for a CAF member,” the email added.But, many others quoted in the same article note that it goes way beyond an education effort, and is clearly much more of an attempt to stifle free speech and criticism of the military.
Ottawa lawyer and former military officer Michel Drapeau said the form is an obvious attempt to intimidate those who were injured and prevent them from speaking out about ill treatment.There is, of course, a fine line -- especially with military personnel -- about what they can and should communicate with the rest of the world. But this really does seem like a way to try to silence wounded vets who might have very legitimate criticisms as to how they've been treated.
“It’s not illegal but it’s obviously a threat,” said Drapeau, who has represented injured soldiers as they try to get benefits from the federal government. “The criticism about the leadership’s failure to take care of the wounded is obviously hitting home.”
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: canada, free speech, gag order, social media, veterans
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"In fact, they're told they should "discourage others in uniform." "
Should be
"In fact, they're told they should [b]not[/b] "discourage others in uniform." "
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Is this for Active Duty or Retired?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Options for dealing with the military as a politician
1) Change your policies to appeal to military people more.
2) Awkwardly pose for photos with military people who clearly don't like you (see the video of Bush near the end of his 2nd term posing for a picture with 20+ military people who keep on getting disgusted looks on their faces and slowly back away from him).
3) Silence the military by abusing your power, such as making them sign a contract that says they won't say bad things about you.
#1 is a good idea, #2 is hilarious in execution and will be replayed constantly on late night comedy talk shows for a while, and #3 is a great way to get them to hate you even more.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Is this for Active Duty or Retired?
If it's not right, then it's unreasonable. Whether or not it's legal has nothing to do with whether or not it's reasonable.
/pedant mode off
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Options for dealing with the military as a politician
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Unbelievable
WTF, who do they think they are, the United States?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Unbelievable
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Unbelievable
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If you don't like taking care of the wounded soldiers that put their ass on the line for their country, then don't make so many of them and you won't be having this issue.
Those soldiers would not be bitching were they treated right. Trying to cover up the poor handling of wounded vets by trying to stifle their speech says more about the intentions of the military and of politicians not to take care of those who have given their all.
As such citizens as well as currently serving and ex-members of the military should be screaming to high heaven over the lack of taking care of them after they have sacrificed so much.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Unbelievable
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Although this contradicts the first line which says "The Canadian Forces is requiring ... soldiers to sign a form". It seems like a form of intimidation but maybe it's not as bad as this writeup makes it seem.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Broken soldiers - fractured system
Master Warrant Officer Barry Weshiolm's resignation letter and supporting docs.
A sad testament.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32374927/157738201-Westholm-Resignation.pdf
[ link to this | view in thread ]