Technologists To NSA Review Group: Don't Forget About The Interests Of Non-US Persons
from the because-that-matters-too dept
We've been arguing about why the tech industry should be furious and a hell of a lot more vocal about the NSA's spying. One of the big issues is that it's leading to tremendous trust issues with anyone using US-based internet services. In an age where so many internet companies are looking at a global audience, these revelations put them at a significant disadvantage. And, unfortunately, in most of the discussions about all of this spying, the focus has been mainly on whether or not the actions by the NSA have been targeted at US persons. This is important -- because the nature of FISA is that it's supposed to limit NSA activities on US persons -- and there's basically no limit towards what it can do when it comes to non-US persons. That's the nature of the law (and the fact that non-US persons aren't actually under the jurisdiction of the US Constitution in the first place). But that's the legal side of things, not the practical realities. We shouldn't just assume that the issue of spying on non-US persons can be ignored as "perfectly legal." For companies, it can be a complete disaster if non-US persons won't use their services.Thus, it's good to see that when a group of prominent US technologists, academics and activists sent a letter to the NSA Review Group, that (beyond some other key points) includes a discussion of how the impact on non-US persons should not be ignored:
Part of the Review Group's charge is to evaluate the extent to which the NSA surveillance programs respect "our commitment to privacy and civil liberties." In an increasingly global information environment, these commitments undoubtedly extend to non-U.S. persons. The United Nation's Human Rights Council has resolved that, "the same rights that people have offline must also be protected online." If U.S. providers of services must ignore the rights of non-U.S. persons due to domestic surveillance obligations, the free flow of information that Internet activities depend upon will stagnate. On the contrary, if jurisdictions accept -- as the United States does at the UN -- that all users have some rights to privacy regardless of a user's location, this sets a necessary condition for people of the world to feel comfortable engaging in cross-border Internet activities, upon which the promise of a global connected society rests.While I doubt any review, or even any legislative attempt to roll back the NSA's efforts will address this, it's going to become an increasingly important issue. At the very least, it seems like the tech industry should be addressing this head on, rather than letting the NSA and the intelligence community set the frame for the debate.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: non-us persons, nsa, nsa review group, nsa surveillance, technologists
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/surveillance-panel-shut-down-97891.html
"Sorry, we couldn't receive your letter".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now if I had a job offer to go to the US I would refuse.
The US right now regarding to people from the middle east, are acting Germany did with the jews during the Nazi era, with the news they they basically say that every mosque is a terrorist group, and every muslim must have a bomb under their beard.
I believe the US is going in a bad direction and is attracting a lot of bad attention.
I don't understand how Americans just don't do anything about what's happening, you guys don't protest, it looks like you are the government's little minions...
If they passed a law that made it illegal to walk on the street at night, I bet everyone would be like "yeah we don't like it" but noone would do a thing.
Start protests, turn cars around if necessary (i'm against violence but look at the french, their government is affraid of going against the people, or they start rioting and burning the city)
Do something
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
...
Read what you just wrote. Seriously. Read it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
What I meant was the bad treatment the Us are giving to the middle easterns.
I'm trying not to laugh my ass off while reading what I wrote.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I will tell you what I was told once by a Brazilian, it is your interest not mine so it is your responsibility not mine. Harsh I know but true, the American people is in pain for a lot of other issues, they won't defend the right of others when their own are in mortal peril, they don't have the time. is practicality that is an issue, the responsibility everyone has for their own interests is theirs, is up to others to make things hard for the US government and make it unpalatable.
Here is an example from Brazil.
While President Dilma Rousseff is an ex-freedom fighter(aka terrorist) that was jailed and tortured, suffering enormously at the hands of the Brazilian military. She still found the time to pass the new law forcing every Brazilian to install GPS/RFID tags on their cars that will generate, location, dates, model, owner's name and more.
new world order brazil: Brazilians will be forced to use RFID chips and GPS trackers in their cars
Youtube:
SINIAV High-Speed Vehicle Identification Trials at Brazilian Test Site ...
Brazilians protest but most protests got unnoticed, frankly I don't see the point a better protest is to do something about it, something everyone can do and there are cases where people don't do anything about it in public at all like in the case of police brutality.
Extra judicial killings are routine in Brazil so routine that if you type "Brazilian police brutality" in Youtube you can find snuff videos of that police force killing people in broad day light, in America that would be shocking in Brazil is just another day.
WSJ: As Crime Rattles Brazil, Killings by Police Turn Routine
HRW: Brazil: Curb Police Violence in Rio, S�o Paulo
Why Brazilians don't complain?
Put simply is not that people don't care, is that most of them have a lot on their minds and have their very own serious issues too closer to home, they don't have the time or means to think about what happens in other places let alone around the globe.
So don't expect Americans to rise up for the rights of the world, they can't, more than half are living from paycheck to paycheck long gone are the good ol'days.
That doesn't mean the world can't protect itself, Brazilians could use more bicycles, project cities to encourage walking instead of driving and continue to document the brutal reality of Brazilian streets, Americans will still continue to fight for their privacy tooth and nail too.
The Tor Project guys probably have a big grin on their faces after seeing the NSA slides and some of them are Americans, this is not the Brazilian people against the American people or the Peruvian people or the Chilean or the Spanish or the Russian not even the Muslims, this is governments against their own peoples we are weak individually, and we all have our own problems to deal with a better protest is to find ways to deal with them and spread the world so each and everyone of us can do their little part, big protests on the streets change nothing, the occupy movement tried and changed little it may be a form of stress release but that is all.
Going back to the beginning the responsibility for your own privacy is yours. What can you do?
Donate time, expertise and money to people working on the tools legal, technical, etc. Have you donated money to the Tor Project? or the I2P project if you don't want to give money to American developers? there are open hardware companies have you tried to learn what they offer that can increase your privacy?
After you have gone on that path, teach others how to do it, that is a more effective protest, you develop and create the things you need to counter the abuse and of course keep reading Techdirt and the like because they are beacons that shine light on those issues.
What I do, I use TOR for everything, and other P2P(aka distributed) forms of communication, VPN's, proxies with central servers are not secure, they can't do anything against the authorities, they have humans that can be target and forced to comply don't use that, use decentralized tools, encryption is important too, I take my time to create my own keys and encrypt everything, you can even use Facebook encrypted, Facebook won't do it for you of course but you can encrypt all your text and post it encrypted.
Here try it manually first to see how it works.
1. - Find any online text encryption like this one.
https://encipher.it/
2. - Find and online ID generator.
http://www.fakenamegenerator.com/
3. - Encrypt the ID you made it with the online encryption tool.
4. - Create an account somewhere.
Optional:
5. - Create or ask someone to create a script that fetches the data from somewhere and decrypt it.
http://support.gpgtools.org/discussions/everything/8545-encrypting-a-text-file
See you can have public profiles that will all be visible but nobody will be able to read it, that is one way there are others, you can also use Diaspora and donate to them.
Think of donations not as donations but as taxes but instead of paying them to a government that will lie and cheat this one will go to some place where you actually will get some benefit from it, and it is not a one off either you have to commit, you chose the projects you like and pay them to work so they can keep working, but in the case of open source you have the ability to pay what you can.
It is your responsibility to keep your data safe, it is your responsibility and yours alone to do the best you can to protect your privacy.
About the Brazilian SINIAV I wonder how long till RFID clonning becomes widespread.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Umm...wait...
/sarc
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who they come for
Protecting all groups, no matter who they are, from government excess is ultimately necessary to avoid those same excesses being turned on oneself. The system is dynamic, if not forced to shut down, the program only grows. Any secret system is spared criticism and will come to think it is far more capable than it really is, leading to grievous mistakes.
These mass-information gathering apparatuses of the NSA need to be shut down.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
However, every time central processing of sensitive data is discussed the first thing everyone always wants to know is "Is this data going to enter the USA at any time?"
It's not that we have anything to hide, it's just that the USA has such a bad reputation here in Europe...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Perhaps this is an interpretation of the Constitution that needs to change. If you read through the US Constitution, it could be argued that most US Citizens don't fall under the jurisdiction of the Constitution either. The U.S. Constitution, as written, applies to the government of the United States, not the citizens. The fourth amendment to the US Constitution starts out `The Right of the people`, so unless you are going to define non-US citizens as somehow not people, that clause pretty much has to apply to everyone. In the 1700`s when that constitution was written, that interpretation made sense, since if your papers were within the reach of US law enforcement, you were probably a US citizen living in the United States. In a world of global electronic communications, that assumption is no longer true.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's interesting is the US telco industries, who operate solely in the domestic market (AT&T, Verizon, Sprint) have been completely silent.
This makes sense, because they don't have to worry about the rest of the world being pissed off at them, because they do a majority of their business on US soil.
Plus, they don't have to worry about domestic customers being pissed at them, because they have a monopoly on the domestic market and there's nowhere else those customers can go for cellphone service.
Google, Yahoo, Facebook, and Microsoft on the other hand. Are competing in the global marketplace, and that's why we hear them kicking and screaming over getting caught with their hands in the spy jar.
It now makes sense to me why the domestic telcos don't give a damn about their image. They know they have monopoly on the domestic market and don't have to compete against global competitors. They can flip the middle finger at American people, and they know there's nowhere else we can go for cellphone service.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Forget about going to the streets, that is so 80's, the new social agents produce tools, for people to adopt or not.
That will have a bigger impact.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://www.wired.com/design/2013/01/anti-drone-camouflage-apparel/
Personally I would like a mask, maybe even a master chief helmet.
Without clothing to hide your privacy in todays world is like walking naked down the street.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Printed on Hemp
I must have been mistaken.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's the Constitution got to do with it?
So let's stop using the Constitution as a crutch. Look in the mirror, folks, have a meaningful conversation with yourselves.
Sheesh!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rule of thumb
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Rule of thumb
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Are you sure about this Mike?
I thought that the Constitution protected everyone regardless of citizenship with the parts that are worded with the term "people" instead of "citizen". This would include the Bill of Rights. Obviously, other parts of the Constitution that are specifically worded with the term "citizen" wouldn't apply to non-citizens.
Volokh argues this point here: http://www.volokh.com/posts/1235007104.shtml
The EFF also alludes to this argument with this statement:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Would that be because the US had open borders at the time of the Fourth Amendment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Queueing up to get out of US based services.
The two UK based cloud providers reported that they were inundated with companies trying to exit from US based providers to avoid NSA surveillance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let us also not forget about
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Point of Clarification
I realise it's kind of academic given that large parts of it started being treated more like vague suggestions before it even reached its centenary, but nevertheless it would be interesting to know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]