James Clapper Says 'Peace Of Mind' Trumps Effectiveness In Evaluating NSA Surveillance

from the do-these-guys-listen-to-themselves? dept

Wed, Oct 9th 2013 9:42am — Mike Masnick

In yet another Congressional hearing concerning the intelligence community last week, Senator Patrick Leahy finally got the heads of the intelligence community to admit what many of us had been pointing out for a while: that there's no evidence that the key NSA programs up for debate have ever actually been necessary in stopping terrorist attacks. While NSA supporters like Congressional Rep. Joe Heck have flat out lied, in claiming that Section 215 of the Patriot Act had thwarted "54 terrorist plots," during this particular testimony, Leahy got James Clapper and Keith Alexander to admit that, at best, the program had really only been involved in stopping one "terrorist event" in the US, and that "event" wasn't a plot, but rather a cab driver in San Diego sending some money to a terrorist group in Somalia.

But the really incredible part was that confessed liar to Congress, Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, tried to defend all this, arguing that figuring out whether or not these surveillance programs were actually necessary or useful in stopping terrorist plots was the wrong metric. Instead, he made up his own metric. The "peace of mind" metric:

There's another metric I would use; let's call it the "peace of mind metric". In the case of the Boston Marathon bomber, we were able to use these tools to determine whether there was, or was not, a subsequent plot in NYC.

Of course, we've already discussed how utterly ridiculous this argument is when President Obama himself used the "post-Boston" lack of other plots as support for NSA surveillance. It's quite incredible when you argue that the absence of additional attacks that never existed in the first place is somehow a "victory" for surveillance efforts.

But, really, this "peace of mind" metric is worth exploring, because it's basically the same thing as "the dictator's creed." Clapper's argument is that he can ignore the Constitution, because it might make you feel safer. As Julian Sanchez argued when Clapper made this statement, under the "peace of mind metric" because of the lack of additional threats, it automatically means that every innocent person's records are "relevant," since they help prove the lack of an additional threat. Just think for a second how insane that is. Sanchez takes the analogy further:

Let's try it for warrants: There's always probable cause to believe a search will produce evidence of guilt OR reassure us of innocence.

The more you think about the insidious nature of such a metric, the worse and worse you realize it is. If the government considers evidence of innocence to be relevant and necessary for "peace of mind" then there is no 4th Amendment any more and there is no privacy. At all. The government, using this made up metric, can argue that any search is warranted because it's "just making sure you're not a threat."

That's not the standard. That's not the metric. It's completely unconstitutional.

So, again, we have to ask: how the hell is James Clapper still employed as the Director of National Intelligence?

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: james clapper, keith alexander, nsa, nsa surveillance, peace of mind, relevance

60 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 9:50am

Raise your hand if you'd have greater 'peace of mind' if the NSA stopped it's domestic spying.

*Raises hand*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:22am
  
  Re:
  I'd raise my hand,but my computer is watching me
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:24am
  
  Re:
  *Keeps hand down*
  
  Not an American. Does my privacy and peace of mind not matter?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Alt0, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:33am
    
    Re: Re: Non-Americans Too!
    The NSA shutting down should create "peace-of-mind" in all people, of all countries.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:43am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Non-Americans Too!
      The suggestion was the shutting down of NSA domestic operations, not shutting it down.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - beltorak (profile), 10 Oct 2013 @ 7:27am
    
    Re: Re:
    No, it does not. Because you are not an American citizen, you don't deserve the basic human right to privacy nor the dignity it entails. In fact, I invite you over to our great country so you can be so privileged as to have our illustrious leaders personally spit in your non-human face. You should be thankful we let you talk on the Internet at all.
    
    /putting-words-in-my-government's-mouth
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:24am
  
  Re:
  I personally would have greater "peace of mind" if people like Clapper and Alexander were removed from their possitions, prosecuted for the civil rights violations that they have admitted to committing and then were sent to jail where they belong.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:47am
    
    Re: Re:
    Sorry... if you were expecting to find someone with a spine or a pair on capital hill you have obviously not been paying much attention to the state of affairs lately.
    
    I suspect that none of this stops until the lead flies.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 12:29pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      I never said I was EXPECTING that to happen. I'm not dillusional. I was merely stating that if "peace of mind" is the goal, that would be a means of accomplishing it for me personally as someone who values the principles set forth by our Constitution. However, if this outcome is to have any chance of happening, calls for this need to be repeated often and loudly by as many people as possible even if it is still very unlikely to occur.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- silverscarcat (profile), 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:24am
  
  Re:
  *raises both hands, gets everyone in town to do the same*
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:26am
  
  Re:
  *raises hand*
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Rikuo (profile), 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:45am
  
  Re:
  *Finds dead bodies, rips their arms off, tie them together, then waves the gory end result around*
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Loki, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:46am
  
  Re:
  Well since he's given us the metric, we might as well make good use of it.
  
  Personally, my "peace of mind" would NOT be decreased in the slightest should these programs (and the politicians and lackeys supporting them) go away tomorrow, given that the odds of me being directly, or even indirectly, by some nebulous terrorist threat is remote enough to be essentially insignificant.
  
  However, my "peace of mind" would actually be greatly increased if a bunch of government officials would breaking the law, redefining the law in violation of principles this country was founding on, and otherwise snooping on everyone instead of doing the jobs the were given.
  
  Here's an idea, instead of sticking their noses in everyone's business, why don't try try fixing the economy, providing real healthcare, quality jobs, and most of all actually making a real fucking budget.
  
  Now THAT would give me "peace of mind".
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 9:54am

The Constitution trumps both of Clappers' claims.

I want to know from our politicians why that lying sack of crap still has a job!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:23am
  
  Re:
  He showed the politicians what dirt he has on them.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
weneedhelp (profile), 9 Oct 2013 @ 9:58am

how the hell is James Clapper still employed as the Director of National Intelligence?
This is the kind of asshatery that gets you promoted... who are we kidding?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not an Electronic Rodent (profile), 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:00am

Doubly dubious
In the case of the Boston Marathon bomber, we were able to use these tools to determine whether there was, or was not, a subsequent plot in NYC.
Except it's impossible to prove a negative, so the best he's in fact saying is "With this massive invasion of privacy and violation of the constitution we can be reasonably sure that there's probably not any other related pieces of the plot out there... until of course we get proved wrong by something we missed in the enormous haystack."

Yeah, that's a great justification... basically, "It doesn't matter whether any of this stuff really does anything as long as we think we can convince people they are safe and we're doing something with the enormous amounts of money we spend."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hggdh (profile), 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:09am

Proving innocence is NP-hard
Let's try it for warrants: There's always probable cause to believe a search will produce evidence of guilt OR reassure us of innocence.

er. I would rather say "or require more searches".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 9 Oct 2013 @ 11:54am
  
  Re: Proving innocence is NP-hard
  "er. I would rather say 'or require more searches'."
  
  That's what he said. Think about it, the search that reassured us of innocence used information that is weeks or months old at that point. Another search has to be performed to keep our reassurance of innocence up.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
limbodog (profile), 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:13am

Peace of mind
Peace of mind comes from knowing the billions and billions we've spent, and continue to spend, on surveillance has successfully thwarted a cab driver from disobeying the law. If you live in a big city, you know how difficult this can be.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:21am
  
  Re: Peace of mind
  He didn't really disobey the law when you consider the Citizens United ruling says money is speech.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
saulgoode (profile), 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:15am

There's another metric I would use; let's call it the "peace of mind metric".
I agree with this 100% -- however I'd find much greater peace of mind if an agency of my government wasn't wasting billions of dollars subverting the efficacy of the greatest development of humankind ever and threatening the status of over 4 trillion dollars in annual global commerce (not to mention petty little things such as representative government and rights to privacy, free speech, and due process).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:17am

How can the tools which were not able to determine the original plot can be used to determine whether there was, or not a subsequent plot? A subsequent plot would likely unfold within moments of the original one, and they'll be tracking pizza joints during that time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:18am

Well, I'm sorry that you were killed by [natural disaster/terrorist plot/your pet hamster]. But we ran the numbers and we are *pretty sure* that you can't be killed again.

Peace of mind.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:43am
  
  Re:
  And apparently running those numbers caused the computers in their data centers to blow up... 10 times!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
MondoGordo (profile), 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:27am

how the hell is James Clapper still employed as the Director of National Intelligence?
Clearly ... he has TENURE!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:34am
  
  Re: how the hell is James Clapper still employed as the Director of National Intelligence?
  or sticky like the claps.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:28am

East Germany would be jealous...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:45am
  
  Re:
  Former STASI agents have told that they are morally disgusted by the extend of NSA surveillance. Modern surveillance is completely off the rails!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
any moose cow word, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:32am

Arguing that this is all needed for "piece of mind" is fundamentally a guilty until proven innocent paranoia that blankets the entire globe. Everyone must continually submit to these warrantless violations of our privacy to reaffirm our innocence every day. The constitutionally mandated presumption of innocence has never been more necessary till now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- any moose cow word, 9 Oct 2013 @ 11:49am
  
  Re:
  *"peace of mind"
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:53am

"In the case of the Boston Marathon bomber, we were able to use these tools to determine whether there was, or was not, a subsequent plot in NYC."

So why didn't all those tools determine there was a threat of the Boston Marathon being bombed? Isn't that what those "tools" are meant to do?

I agree that is legitimatizes any law enforcement agency to do whatever it wants, including using drones for surveillance.

It makes me wonder if these arguements weren't developed by the private prison industry to reassure their investors that business is booming even if a few illegals escape imprisonment due to reform.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Niall (profile), 10 Oct 2013 @ 6:47am
  
  Re:
  'These tools' = 20/20 hindsight. 100% guaranteed precise! Your tax dollars at work...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:56am

And then, politicians are amazed that a few are rejoicing about shut down of the federal government ... yet it is the federal government who is assuming every citizen is suspicious. What do they expect?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Pragmatic, 10 Oct 2013 @ 5:53am
  
  Re:
  The "few" are rejoicing that only we are affected by the shutdown. They're not. And the politicians certainly aren't.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hephaestus (profile), 9 Oct 2013 @ 10:58am

"peace of mind metric" more like the paranoia metric
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Craig, 9 Oct 2013 @ 11:06am

End Days
At what point do the "terrorists" become less of a threat than the people calling them terrorists? It seems to me that we are in the hands of people who through cognitive dissonance or actual malicious intent desire to bring upon us what the "terrorists" had originally intended. Sort of like "you can't do that but we sure can".

More disturbing is the possibility that a sociopathic meme has infected our leaders to where they feel the justification of what they are doing really is the right answer to the problem, in the same way that someone would burn down their house in order to protect it from thieves.

And then there is the belief meme, Michele Bachmann anyone? If Jesus or God intends for there to be an apocalypse, "End Times" and Judgment Day perhaps it our destiny to make sure it happens...

Any way you look at it it's bad news. We are truly our own worst enemy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That One Guy (profile), 9 Oct 2013 @ 2:32pm
  
  Re: End Days
  Yeah, they completely blew past that point decades ago, the corrupt government in the US has been a greater threat to citizens both US and otherwise for decades now.
  
  Terrorists can kill people, but then again so can peanuts. The proper response to both is take reasonable safety precautions and get on with your life, as living in fear of them is exactly what they are trying to achieve.
  
  The government on the other hand can, will and has destroyed basic human rights, such as privacy, fair treatment under the law (including the right to a court case before punishment), and justifies their actions by constantly trying to keep people in a state of fear, so that they are willing to accept any encroachment of their rights if only they get to 'feel' safer.
  
  At this point, if you define terrorism as 'actions designed to bring a state of fear and panic in your target', the government are the terrorists, the others are just amateurs.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 7:13pm
    
    Re: Re: End Days
    The terrorists have indeed won.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 7:14pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: End Days
      They said we would destroy ourselves from within, and we are falling all over ourselves to prove them right. I use the metaphorical we, of course.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rikuo (profile), 9 Oct 2013 @ 11:11am

Okay, so since having a peace of mind now overrides any and all laws in the US, can I find a gun and shoot Clapper in the face? Along with all of his cronies? After all, my peace of mind is more important than laws saying pre-meditated murder is illegal, according to their logic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- any moose cow word, 9 Oct 2013 @ 11:48am
  
  Re:
  Well, they think illegally assassinating US citizens is OK as long as it gives them "peace of mind"--they can always justify it by slapping on a "terrorist" charge postmortem. Since they've already set the legal precedent, and bureaucrats like Clapper definitely fit the definition of terrorist, it must be OK. It would certainly give the citizens of the world peace of mind when their reign as ended.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 11:23am

insurance salesman...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 11:56am

"So, again, we have to ask: how the hell is James Clapper still employed as the Director of National Intelligence?"

The government's policy is FUMU. F Up to Move Up. The more you F Up, the more you Move Up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Baldaur Regis (profile), 9 Oct 2013 @ 12:19pm

Well, I always have peace of mind after visiting my proctologist. But that doesn't mean I want to have the government's finger jammed up my ass 24/7, going "Yup, still good....no problemo buddy...wait, wait, oops false alarm, little gas there...oookay, still good..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 12:53pm

My mind would rest a lot easier if James Clapper was fired and brought up on contempt of congress charges.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 2:06pm
  
  Re:
  Forget contempt of congress. Congress has proven that they are worthy of being treated with contempt. Try civil rights violations against the entire population of the US if not human rights violations on the majority of world. That's more on par with what is deserved.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 1:00pm

Me in 15 years: Son, politicians were originally meant to be our servants, an extension of our will, for the good of all people
10 year old son: HELP! TERRORIST!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 1:03pm

It would be much lower if they stopped slapping the terrorist label on shit like throwing water balloons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 1:03pm

But....
There's another metric I would use; let's call it the "peace of mind metric". In the case of the Boston Marathon bomber, we were able to use these tools to determine whether there was, or was not, a subsequent plot in NYC.

BUT...you fail to mention how all this surveillance FAILED TO STOP THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING ITSELF!

So nice try, asshole, but it's still a FAILURE!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- any moose cow word, 9 Oct 2013 @ 5:04pm
  
  Re: But....
  Hey, it was essential for stopping the non-existent follow-up threat against NYC!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 1:38pm

Peace of Mind = False Sense of Security
In my business, Fire Alarm & Security (Access Control, Intrusion Detection); this type of "Peace of Mind" is called a False Sense of Security and is a perfect setup for a lawsuit against our company. Once again, the government is shielded from the real world results of their incompetent actions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
J-rad, 9 Oct 2013 @ 4:12pm

just waiting for the announcement; James Clapper promoted to head of thought police. "Freedom is Slavery"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- any moose cow word, 9 Oct 2013 @ 5:06pm
  
  Re:
  Freedom is Slavery
  
  Well, the illusion of freedom usually is.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 5:47pm
    
    Re: Re:
    "freedom is slavery" is probably not the best quote to re-enforce my comment as it part of the larger topic "can you truly be free in society that has rules of any kind?" but in this context I don't think that its that relevant. more reference to the 1984 world that clapper seems intent of creating.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - any moose cow word, 9 Oct 2013 @ 11:10pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      more reference to the 1984 world that clapper seems intent of creating.
      
      Yes, I got the reference, which was the entire point of my comment. Freedom in such a world is a manufactured illusion.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2013 @ 9:49pm

Please refer to him as NSA perjurer, not liar. He didn't just lie, he lied to congress while providing testimony. He lied in a manner considered far more serious than a typical untruth, and needs to be imprisoned for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
corwin155 (profile), 9 Oct 2013 @ 11:55pm

'Peace Of Mind'
Peace of mind comes from knowing every person who
1. isn't happy that their government is spying on them
2. does something that they could patent wont because you can tell your friends in the military industrial complex corporations
3. are the NSA's political enemies
4. have dirty little secrets that can be used against them
5. is born in the USA is a criminal from birth and you have secret laws and secret courts that make them so
6. isn't in law enforcement thus exempt from the law and secret laws
7. you don't like can and will be destroyed
8. can be water-boarded and thrown into a secret prison
9. can be assassinated if they refuse to do what you say
10. is part of the good ol boys in the NSA will be protected by the DOJ even when they lie to congress of the soon to be dictatorship of NAZI United Police State of America

The peace of mind of the dictatorship run by the NSA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 10 Oct 2013 @ 6:44am

New World Order
tHey are not likely to be limited by one country's "constitution" at this point, having gone through so much trouble to defunct it for the last six decades or so.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OH, 1 Apr 2014 @ 3:42pm

FTPOS Clapper
F--- the piece of sh-- James Clapper WITTINGLY.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]