EFF's Parker Higgins' Favorite Techdirt Stories Of The Week
from the so-many-EFF-issues... dept
Hi Techdirt! I'm Parker Higgins, an activist at EFF. It's been a big week in the office, so I'm especially excited that Mike and the gang asked me to wrap up some of the top stories of the last few days. If you'll indulge me, some of my personal top stories this week have a bit of an EFF-y flair.
First off, with this week came the announcement of Freedom of the Press Foundation's relaunch of Aaron Swartz's whistleblower platform. There aren't really formal institutional ties between EFF and the Freedom of the Press Foundation, but its Executive Director, Trevor Timm works alongside me full-time as an EFF activist, and I was lucky enough to get the chance to help out with this software. It's good stuff, and as security expert Bruce Schneier says, "I hope this system is broadly implemented and extensively used."
One short Techdirt story was a big one at EFF: we filed to invalidate a majorly bogus patent that is being used to shakedown famous podcasters. You've heard it before, and you'll hear it again, but I just don't want to rest until we've destroyed all patent trolls—and our patent lawyers Julie Samuels, Daniel Nazer, and activist Adi Kamdar are working to do just that.
Another great story this week covered the launch of a new site called PiracyData.org. Hollywood is quick to point the finger at whoever it can blame for unauthorized downloading: users, technologies, companies, search engines, whatever. This new site does a clever mashup of two data sets—TorrentFreak's top downloaded movie list, and a database of what's available for streaming, renting, and buying—to effectively make the point that Hollywood itself could be doing a lot more to make content available. It's an old saw that you can't compete with free, but it sure would be easier if you're actually, y'know, competing.
Similarly, Tim covered the back-and-forth over Spotify between two musicians I deeply admire: Dave Allen, the bassist for Gang of Four, and David Byrne, who was an amazing frontman to the Talking Heads but is way off-base when he argues—seriously—that "the internet will suck all the creative content out of the world." David Byrne's sentiments echoes Thom Yorke's, previously, and while both of these guys are really incredible musicians, their take on Spotify and other streaming services is sadly short-sighted.
Bringing it back to EFF for a minute, Glyn covered the "truly stupid idea" to make DRM an official aspect of HTML5. Of course, Mr. Moody is correct, and that's why we officially made the argument to the W3C that DRM has no place in the HTML charter. Unfortunately, Tim Berners-Lee has ruled the proposal in-scope, and responded at length on the W3C blog. Still, Berners-Lee is making some fundamental framing errors that confuse the issue, and Glyn does a great job calling him out for those.
Finally, a post that I consider classic Techdirt material, is this epic takedown of a series of bald-faced lies from Senator Feinstein. The Senator has said that the NSA dragnet would have been helpful in stopping 9/11, which is not just a shameless appeal to people's emotions, but flat-out verifiably wrong. The Techdirt post quotes at length from a thorough debunking which is worth reading itself, but I loved the line Mike ended his post with: "If they can't support their program with the truth, it seems pretty clear that there's no reason to support the surveillance program at all."
Amen, brother. To wrap up, we've got the good: privacy-preserving whistleblower tech, reasoned responses to musicians concerned about streaming; the bad: patent trolls, misleading arguments from Hollywood, and DRM in HTML; and the ugly: sitting Senators serving up mendacious propaganda for NSA spying. What a week!
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Uhh...sure you want to leave that in? Because from where I'm sitting, it sounds like there are very formal ties between EFF and Freedom of the Press.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This from the embarrassing douchenozzle who sees the MPAA behind very anti-piracy law, judicial decision enforcement action, etc, etc.
"There aren't really formal institutional ties between EFF and the Freedom of the Press Foundation, but its Executive Director, Trevor Timm works alongside me full-time as an EFF activist,"
Right, just as there are no formal ties except the ED of the Freedom of the Press Foundation is on the EFF payroll full-time. No reason to infer any ties there.
How about EFF controls the Freedom of the Press Foundation, that's the truth of the matter.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
" length from a thorough debunking "
So the system works (NOW!!!!), but you want it taken down, so your saying if they failed to "USE THOSE TOOLS" then they should just stop using those tools now ???
This would be (and is) a very good argument showing the present system is necessary, required and wanted, and most importantly more effective now that in the past.
Why to shoot down your own article, and yes, it is a good read, perhaps you should read it!
So they are using those tools now, so what is your problem again ?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
So they knew his identity, that might be true, but did they know what he was going to do ??
They probably know the identity of many people who have not done anything (YET)..
So are you blaming the security community for not guessing what this person was going to do before he did it ?
That does not appear to me to be all that strong of an argument, but I guess if it all you got, you have to run with it.
Silly NSA for not being able to predict what someone is going to do at some future time !!!!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: " length from a thorough debunking "
This would greatly improve the public confidence on it and give it a way to be audited if needed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Trust us anonymous cowards that DRM is good as nothing at all.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
There's actually a good amount of truth to that though. Rage tends to come with an adrenaline rush that feels good, like all drugs you shouldn't abuse. If a person runs on anger long enough, fear enters into the equation as well, putting the victim at the center of a fantasy drama that creates the illusion of personal power. That's how you get trolls who think that all the disciplinary action and retribution aimed at them is just evidence that they're right and everyone else is wrong.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ohai!
Have we destroyed copyright yet comrade?
*falls over giggling*
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Indeed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: " length from a thorough debunking "
2) Tools sufficient and some not necessary => sifting through data causes time lags and attacks succeed.
3) Tools not sufficient and all necessary => some attacks missed.
4) Tools not sufficient and some not necessary => organization completely useless.
Ideal case: 1
Case in 2001: 2
Case Today: worse case of 2
Case in 2001 according to Feinstein: 3
If Feinstein were correct, more programs to try and shore up sufficiency deficit would be a valid trade-off (one many of us would still oppose making) where freedoms would be sacrificed for increased security.
The investigations surrounding 9/11 instead indicate the case where there was too much data, meaning that programs needed to slimmed down and made more efficient and focused to increase security. By instead expanding them we have sacrificed both security and freedoms.
[ link to this | view in thread ]