It's Finally Dawning On Tech Companies That All This NSA Stuff Is Bad For Them
from the more-of-that-please dept
We've been arguing since the beginning of the Snowden leaks, that the tech industry should be much angrier than it is about all of this, because the fallout and blowback from this is going to impact these companies quite a bit. To date, the big tech companies have been fighting back, but it's mostly focused on the transparency issue, arguing in court that the gag orders barring them from talking about what the government has legally compelled them to do, is a violation of their First Amendment rights. And that's correct and an important fight, but we've been disappointed that the tech companies haven't supported even greater reforms and changes, including greater privacy protections. But that might be changing.Obviously, the news of the NSA infiltrating private network links between data centers should make these companies even angrier. It appears that Google is getting there, though Yahoo still doesn't seem to realize what just happened.
However, in an interesting move that at least hints at potential further realization from the tech industry that they need to support user privacy rights, the big guys -- Google, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, Yahoo and AOL -- have all sent a letter to Congress in support of the USA Freedom Act. In it, they once again talk up the importance of greater transparency. But, also, for the first time that I can remember, they appear to be arguing for even more:
Transparency is a critical first step to an informed public debate, but it is clear that more needs to be done. Our companies believe that government surveillance practices should also be reformed to include substantial enhancements to privacy protections and appropriate oversight and accountability mechanisms for those programs.And, even with the letter being sent today, it was almost certainly written and approved before yesterday's revelations -- meaning that this was before they realized the NSA was trying (and succeeding) to backdoor into their networks without their knowledge. Hopefully they'll start pushing for even more significant reforms as well. Some have argued that the tech industry has been complicit in the NSA surveillance efforts, while others have suggested they were compelled, or even tricked/hacked into it. The evidence suggests a combination of all of those factors (in varying degrees across the different companies). But if they want to actually regain the trust of their users, they should stand up for the rights of their users and support the efforts to create real change and to stop illegal surveillance, rather than just increasing transparency.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: civil liberties, nsa, nsa surveillance, reform, tech companies, usa freedom act
Companies: aol, apple, facebook, google, microsoft, yahoo
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
*insert Typical OOTB rant*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: *insert Typical OOTB rant*
*Counter-argument found, inserting...*
1) Use tech companies to fight Government for privacy
2) Use Government to fight tech companies for privacy
3) ??? <= private
*Done*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: *insert Typical OOTB rant*
2) Use Government to fight tech companies for privacy
3) ??? <= private
4) Profit!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who knew?
This isn't over by a long shot. Many of these corporations have long term contracts but they end at some point and when they do, it's liable to be dropped for another company outside the US's domain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: @ The AC who knows what to do about search engines:
I suppose that an answer to my question in a prior item. Gosh, that solves the whole problem of Google tracking and collating everyone across teh Internets! And will totally prevent the gov't from getting all the data that Google has. -- Sheesh. Do you even know what Javascript is, or about web bugs, or know any of Google's many parasites such as doubleclick, google-analytics, and its captcha and other web kit? Those are now in most web-sites and much more invasive than merely search results, and nearly impossible to avoid at all times. -- No, obviously you're just a dimwit who doesn't even know the scope of Google, if think you've escaped its surveillance. You're worse than no help at all!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: @ The AC who knows what to do about search engines:
For all your ranting and raving it is very obvious you have no clue of what you speak of. If you don't know how to get around that crap you're worse off than I thought you are because it indicates you are eat up with the dumb ass.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: @ The AC who knows what to do about search engines:
Any comment made online can be picked up and used to call you out down the line depending on how stupid or wrong it is. Any search you make is picked up and used to serve you more accurate results the next time around. Otherwise, enjoy the frustration of trying to find what you're looking for while wading through pages of crap you're not interested in.
That's what she's complaining about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thanks, kids! out_of_the_blue got 3 mentions already!
Anyhoo, Mike, with only 6 comments so far, half of them sheer idiots with ad hom for me, is it "finally dawning" on you that this NSA bump has nearly run its course?
And while you haven't made any predictions about it, and thus can't actually be wrong, you have at times given the impression that Congress will take action, but do you really think that this lame call from mega-corporations for vague "substantial enhancements" is anything but Public Relations ploy? Sheesh. I'd have to strain to write anything so vague.
And yet again, your pro-corporatist concern is only for corporations, and alleged "violation of their" totally imaginary "First Amendment rights," WITHOUT A WORD of concern for we mere "natural" persons.
So long as "The Market" (if not NSA directly) rewards Google for spying, do you expect it to do LESS of it?
13:23:40[o-530-4]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh, you're proven wrong already, Mike! They're all eager to help!
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-10-31/google-oracle-engineers-enlisted-for-obamacare- tech-surge
Now, if that doesn't get you to suspect tech mega-corporations are all in cahoots with the administration and would like to distance themselves from it, you are, to use one of Mike's favorite terms, clueless.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh, you're proven wrong already, Mike! They're all eager to help!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
An industry devoted to bleeding billions from the government and private citizens by any means possible is going to get religion and stand for integrity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How quickly and severely will this affect Real Estate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How quickly and severely will this affect Real Estate
Longer: obviously, general property values depend a lot more on the general state of the economy and stuff like interest rates than on the performance of specific companies.
Within that framework, for a specific area, I'd also look to the supply-and-demand issues related to local employers. So if the Snowden stuff was to lead to non-US customers spending elsewhere, that could eventually alter the hiring practices of a particular company, and thus the local demand.
But realistically, unless a particular local economy is overwhelmingly dominated by a single employer, the latter effects will be buried by the former. And the damn Bay Area is overpriced, anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Its All The Stupid Customers Fault
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its All The Stupid Customers Fault
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What is a funny way to call Europeans? do they have any animal that could symbolize them all?
Digressing, Europe is safe against the AT&T's Death Star for now, although I really doubt that AT&T or any American Telecom can compete anywhere not called Canada.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hot Ain't It
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
nothing good.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Credit where credit is due
[ link to this | view in chronology ]