Apple Puts Dead Man's Switch About Not Receiving PATRIOT Act Requests In Its Transparency Report
from the well,-look-at-that... dept
It's a bit late, but it appears that Apple has finally caught up with Google, Twitter, Microsoft, Facebook and Yahoo, as tech companies that have issued "transparency reports" about government requests for data (and, in some cases, for takedowns). The first Apple Transparency Report is pretty similar to the transparency reports issued by those other companies. As with the others, the US government only allows "ranges" of information to be released about certain kinds of reports, rather than exact numbers. And, of course, no companies are yet allowed to reveal the details of Section 702 orders -- which are a part of the PRISM program. The various companies are suing the government over that one.Some people have noted that Apple seems to get fewer requests than some other companies, but that doesn't seem like an apples-to-apples comparison, since Apple's main business is hardware, and its online services are much more limited and targeted than those other companies. But, there is one interesting tidbit in the report. Way down at the end it says the following:
Apple has never received an order under Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act. We would expect to challenge such an order if served on us.Now, Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act is the so-called "business records" or "tangible things" clause, which is used to demand all the metadata from the various telcos (who appear to be happy to hand it over without complaint). There's been no indication so far that the government has used 215 on the tech companies. PRISM all relates to Section 702 of the FAA, which the lawsuit mentioned above is about. And, of course, there are reports of the NSA using Executive Order 12333 to justify hacking into servers overseas, without companies even knowing about it. So, you can argue that whether or not any Section 215 orders were served on Apple is somewhat meaningless.
But... it appears that Apple has put this in the report as a sort of dead man's switch, such as Cory Doctorow suggested a few months ago: for companies that have not received any such type of order, if they announce that publicly on a regular basis, if the next time they release a report it's not in there, it becomes clear that they have received such an order, even if they're gagged about it. This is also known as a warrant canary, and was originally suggested for libraries -- who were afraid of Section 215 from the very beginning (early on, it was often referred to as the library clause), as people expected the feds to use it to spy on people's library records.
While given the other programs this may not seem like a big deal, it's nice to see Apple taking this particular step, even if small, to effectively protest against the 215 gag orders.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: dead man's switch, patriot act, prism, section 215, section 702, transparency, warrant canary
Companies: apple
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
We've NO way of verifying any of this. Sheer PR.
But Mike Romney thinks corporations are persons complete with rights and morals and can be trusted.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
After all they have not included any 'dead man's switch'referring to them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The point of a dead-man's switch is that it eliminates the need for operator intervention: it triggers whether you like it or not.
It is more like a flag that you rise or lower depending on the circumstances. Flag up, everything is fine. Flag down, trouble.
/end pedantic dick mode
That said, we have no way to confirm that Apple is actually telling the while truth. We're just going to have to trust a mega-corporation to be honest. And we all know how that usually ends.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: We've NO way of verifying any of this. Sheer PR.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
We pretty much know they have, since they're listed as a PRISM partner. Also, they just filed a brief in the lawsuit over the 702 gag orders... so... yeah.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: We've NO way of verifying any of this. Sheer PR.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood
...and the actual encounter in Iowa, with Romney...
'Romney explained that one way to fulfill promises on entitlement programs is to “raise taxes on people,” but before he could articulate his position on not raising taxes, someone interrupted.
“Corporations!” a protester shouted, apparently urging Romney to raise taxes on corporations that have benefited from loopholes in the tax code. “Corporations!”
“Corporations are people, my friend,” Romney said.
Some people in the front of the audience shouted, “No, they’re not!”
“Of course they are,” Romney said. “Everything corporations earn ultimately goes to people. Where do you think it goes?”'
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2011-08-11/politics/35270239_1_romney-supporters-mitt-romn ey-private-sector-experience
Please don't make things worse by twisting the truth to meet your need to belittle people that have a different point of view. We have enough elected talking mouths that do this to us on a daily basis.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
"keep feeding the canary or we will ... " -some goverment stooge
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Google,Apple,MS, and others all join hands and all raise the two fingered salute and do it now !!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I'm jk, there's plenty of good things to say from Apple stuff even though I don't like some aspects of the company. This is one of those.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Apple's Transparency Report
http://2paragraphs.com/2013/11/apples-stand-against-section-215-of-the-patriot-act/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: We've NO way of verifying any of this. Sheer PR.
-[Dunno who]
[ link to this | view in thread ]