John McCain Now Pretends He Didn't Say Keith Alexander Should Resign; Gives Nonsensical Explanation
from the accountability-how? dept
We just wrote about Senator John McCain calling for NSA boss Keith Alexander to either be fired or resign -- though for the exact wrong reasons. Specifically, he wants him fired for letting little people like Ed Snowden and Chelsea Manning have access to important documents and also for having embarrassing facts (like that we spy on McCain's friends in high places, like Angela Merkel) revealed. Let's be clear. Here is McCain's exact quote:SPIEGEL: Should Keith Alexander, head of the NSA, resign?While a bit odd that McCain would refer to Alexander as plural, it's hard to say that he didn't say that. But, guess what? His press people are now trying to walk this back, and saying that McCain did not say what he actually said.
McCain: Of course, they should resign or be fired.
“Senator McCain believes that there needs to be accountability for the Snowden leaks, but he is not calling for the resignation of General Alexander, who is retiring soon,” McCain spokesman Brian Rogers told POLITICO. < ?i>Actually, he did call for his resignation (or firing). Quite directly, as noted above. Separately, just what kind of "accountability" is he calling for? In the interview, he clearly said those responsible should be fired or resign. Of course, perhaps someone reminded him that Alexander is an "important person" like himself, Merkel and other top politicians, and he realized that "accountability" only applies to the little people.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: accountability, ed snowden, john mccain, keith alexander
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Man...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Man...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Man...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Man...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Man...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mike continues to think politico-babble is important.
So here's one I like:
"Some people think that the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are private monopolies which prey upon the people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lenders." The Honorable Louis McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee in the 1930s http://www.4thmedia.org/2013/10/21/who-owns-the-federal-reserve-the-fed-is-privately-owned-and-its-s hareholders-are-private-banks/
09:02:57[k-5-3]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mike continues to think politico-babble is important.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Mike continues to think politico-babble is important.
No Blue doesn't. And what makes this even more funny is that Blue felt the need to scold the community for being off-topic this morning.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Mike continues to think politico-babble is important.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mike continues to think politico-babble is important.
Is Blue attempting comedy here?
I find this statement to be utterly hilarious. Blue's comments have about as much relevancy in my everyday life as that piece of gunk stuck to the bottom of my shoe. Both are annoying, formless, messy and useless.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So in actuality he wasn't JUST calling for the resignation of Alexander, but also the members of the intelligence committees and the President. Ok, I think that would be an acceptable outcome given the how egregious this was. Let's start with the Feinstein and Mr. "I don't really know what a violation of privacy is" Rogers since Alexander is on the way out anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NSA - Resignations - Accountability
I can imagine the phone call originating from within the NSA and reminding McCain of the "incident/s" he would like to keep private and how it might accidentally become public knowledge if he didn't change his position or statement.
They are watching everybody McCain, not just the "little people". Welcome to the nightmare of your creation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: NSA - Resignations - Accountability
No, bud.
The call probably came from McCain's own staff. Or maybe someone the senator met on the cocktail circuit. Doesn't really matter.
And all the call was, simply, was a reminder that General Alexander was retiring soon. Nothing more. And not sinister at all. Only the fact of General Alexander's imminent retirement.
Senator McCain just wasn't aware of that fact. He didn't know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: NSA - Resignations - Accountability
I'm also not your "bud", pal. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: NSA - Resignations - Accountability
Really? If that's the case maybe he should be calling for his own resignation on the ground that he's a clueless wonder, as that's been public knowledge for almost a month now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: NSA - Resignations - Accountability
IN the 113th Congress, Senator McCain is not a member of the Senate Select Committee On Intelligence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: NSA - Resignations - Accountability
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NSA - Resignations - Accountability
Wait a second… Name any national politician who needs to know what's he's talking about before running his mouth.
That's just not in the political DNA: Knowing anything about the subject? Politicians are compelled to talk, regardless.
You can't hold Senator McCain to some kind of higher standard. That's not fair.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NSA - Resignations - Accountability
"Wait a second… Name any national politician who needs to know what's he's talking about before running his mouth."
They all seem to talk a lot about the Constitution but apparently most of them haven't got a clue about what that is about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NSA - Resignations - Accountability
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NSA - Resignations - Accountability
I thought the Frogs guillotined most of their ancien nobils back in 1789—during their revolution and the terror.
Or did they leave enough aristos with their heads still attached to be worth a damn? Damn all blue-blood aristos.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmmm...
... Actually, scratch that. Considering that there are many slimeball politicians who would twist McCain's words and make it look like he was calling for Obama to resign, doing this double-speak bull crap makes sense, given what goes on in that wackoland that exists inside the Beltway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here is McCain's exact quote
In context, it's apparent that Senator McCain is up to one of those standard political tricks: He is not answering the question the interviewer is asking. Instead, Senator McCain —like any good politician— is answering the question that he wishes the interviewer would have asked.
He's probably such an old hand at this by now, that it's not even a conscious thing anymore. All decent politicians ignore the questions and answer the way they want.
In this case, Senator McCain isn't even trying to be tricky or to obfuscate. He's just following up on “Who must be held accountable?” and answering with how those people should be held to account.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Here is McCain's exact quote
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Are you saying that Senator McCain is flipper-floppering?
Somehow, I didn't have John Sidney McCain III down as one of those wobbly flipper-flopper types.
Are you sure about that?
Flipper-floppering. That's puke-worthy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]