Microsoft Admits Its Datacenters Are Wide Open To NSA Attacks
from the uh,-guys... dept
When the NSA news started breaking this past summer, it was noted that Google quickly realized where the NSA might be hacking in, and rushed to encrypt the links that connect their data centers. While some may criticize this, it's easy to see why companies never bothered to encrypt these links. They're internal networks, with no direct access to the outside world. The threat likelihood was quite low... unless you're a giant government spying operation. That said, once it was revealed that, indeed, this is how the NSA hacks in, no company has an excuse for not encrypting such links. Some Google engineers stated a direct "fuck you" to the NSA, as they were making sure that those links were encrypted (they claimed the job was done, though Google officially has said it's an ongoing process, suggesting they may still be finishing up).Unfortunately, it's not clear that other companies are following suit. When asked about this right after the infiltration was revealed, Yahoo gave a non-committal answer:
"We have strict controls in place to protect the security of our data centers, and we have not given access to our data centers to the NSA or to any other government agency."Yeah, but that doesn't say they encrypt the links between data centers, or even that they're planning to do so. Since then, Yahoo has basically said nothing as far as I can tell. Over in Europe, however, Microsoft has now admitted that it still is not encrypting those links, and is only now investigating the idea.
Dorothee Belz, EMEA VP for Legal and Corporate Affairs made the remark when answering a question from Claude Moraes, MEP during a meeting at the European Parliament on Monday.Sure, it's not something that can be done overnight, but large internet companies who use multiple data centers now need to assume that all of their data is compromised if they're not encrypting the links. Whether or not it's done yet, these companies have a responsibility to get that process started as soon as possible. Hell, they all probably should have started doing this as soon as the news broke that Google was rushing to do this, since it was pretty clear they'd figured out what was going on.
"Generally, what I can say today is server-to-server transportation is generally not encrypted," she said. "This is why we are currently reviewing our security system."
It's especially ironic that Microsoft is now admitting that it's not encrypting the data leaks, because the company has been on a rampage trying to present itself as protecting users privacy and that Google is a privacy nightmare. But, given these admissions, Microsoft has now basically said that its made all of your data available to the US government and it's still thinking about what to do about it, while Google has been rushing to protect its users privacy.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: datacenters, encryption, infiltration, nsa, nsa surveillance, surveillance
Companies: google, microsoft, yahoo
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Collen Kollar-Kotelly
The judge overseeing Microsoft was also the chief judge of the rubber-stamp court.
Coinky-dink?
Or an opportunity to twist arms�and make sure Microsoft cooperated satisfactorily with the government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Collen Kollar-Kotelly
Note the year: 2011.
Rubber-stamp court Judge Kollar-Kotelly was actively supervising Microsoft during this period.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
While companies encrypting internal links is security 101, it only works until the government demands their keys with a gag order. Has Microsoft committed to software as a service just in time for it to go right out of favour due to governments demanding access to everything that traverses the net?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
> Outlook.com encryption unlocked even before official launch
> Microsoft helped the NSA to circumvent its encryption to address concerns that the agency would be unable to intercept web chats on the new Outlook.com portal
> The agency already had pre-encryption stage access to email on Outlook.com, including Hotmail;
> Microsoft also worked with the FBI's Data Intercept Unit to "understand" potential issues with a feature in Outlook.com that allows users to create email aliases
> Within five months, the documents explain, Microsoft and the FBI had come up with a solution that allowed the NSA to circumvent encryption on Outlook.com chats
So please, do tell me more about how "secure" Outlook is. As you can see, even if private CA's, Microsoft helped NSA get the data BEFORE being encrypted.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/11/microsoft-nsa-collaboration-user-data
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dumbass Microsoft
There is NO point to get the Xbone. They take money from private marketers to make more money.
And now you're telling me that as a company, that has multiple products, you can't get your bean counters to work to make the user experience better?
Microsoft, quit messing up!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Thank about how much data they have to transfer between their data centers.
Then think about what it takes to process(by encryption and decryption) all that data.
Now think about how much power you need to do all that processing.
That would be an interesting article just to see the methods and numbers involved.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/11/microsoft-nsa-collaboration-user-data
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Love Google or hate Google
Al Qaeda may be one enemy, the NSA is another.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Years after internet taps were known to me: "Google quickly realized"!
"they [Google engingeers] claimed the [encrypting] job was done, though Google officially has said it's an ongoing process," -- And so the Google engineers were LYING, as one commenter here pointed out: you just don't put encryption at huge scale into place with one click. [PS: that was ME, kids. You all, including Mike at the time, just swallowed that whole.]
"Google has been rushing to protect its users privacy" -- BUT until the last few days, was EXACTLY same place as Microsoft! AND we know from the above that first statements from Google about encryption in place were LIES. YET, after exposing here the known lies from Google, Mike goes on to assert that Google is ever so much more trustworthy than Microsoft, because Microsoft hasn't put out any comforting lies. Now, that's spin done the Mike way.
If Microsoft weren't so evil for so long and so well-known as evil, it'd be difficult to show Google as better in comparison.
Besides that, Google's business is SPYING! It's a bit difficult to claim it's better for privacy! Mike attempts it, even so!
Here's this official piece from the globalist Council on Foreign Relations again:
Privacy Pretense
How Silicon Valley Helped the NSA
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/140246/abraham-newman/privacy-pretense
When you think surveillance or spying or snooping, think Google!
01:39:01[b-522-1]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Years after internet taps were known to me: "Google quickly realized"!
I hope you are able to help me with something, but if not - no worries.
I see your posts on Techdirt a LOT, and it appears you don't like the site at all. Because of this I am honestly really fascinated to know why you keep visiting. I't difficult for me to understand this, and to help me get some sort of picture of you, can you maybe tell me something about you?
I'd love to know a few general things like: what job you do, what other sites you visit, how old you are, what you studied, and the reason you keep coming to this site. I'd understand if you're not keen to divulge this - I'm not big on giving details out on the internet either (I studied philosphy but am in IT), but I'd seriously just love to know.
Regards,
Duncan
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Years after internet taps were known to me: "Google quickly realized"!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Years after internet taps were known to me: "Google quickly realized"!
Blue Bait:
"It's especially ironic that Microsoft is now admitting that it's not encrypting the data leaks, because the company has been on a rampage trying to present itself as protecting users privacy and that Google is a privacy nightmare. But, given these admissions, Microsoft has now basically said that its made all of your data available to the US government and it's still thinking about what to do about it, while Google has been rushing to protect its users privacy."
-
Ha ha ha Blue... YOU got trolled.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
as if Microsoft hasn't got a bad enough name already. Jeez!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I see what you did there!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have a *paid* Skydrive folder. While I encrypt what I put in it, it's just not worth it giving my money to a company that willingly and easily allows the NSA to spy on me.
I have another SpiderOak account that will get my bucks for the next year, not SkyDrive.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Encryption should have been standard
My employer does more with network than systems, and they've made encryption standard for our customers for many years as well. Anything on the outside of a router that is under our customer's control, would be encrypted. Perhaps it helps that our network guys had a lot of experience in the Telco world and knew better than to trust Verizon, Century Link, AT&T, etc. with our customers' data.
Of course, as consultants, we pride ourselves in doing the right thing for our customers. We've been skeptical of this whole public cloud thing, explaining exactly these sorts of risks to our customers and letting them choose. Basically, once your data exists on a system you don't control, you cannot assume that your data is secure unless it is encrypted with keys that are not shared with the provider.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Of course
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I imagine when you have a fiber optic line pushing 10Gbps of encrypted traffic, some kind of AES accelerated co-processor is going to be necessary to reduce the load on the server's CPU.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, well. Maybe Mike was offsetting pro-Microsoft "news":
Microsoft offered a glimpse inside its new center that�s devoted to combating cybercrime.
http://seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/2022261760_microsoftcybercrimexml.html.
ht tp://seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/2022261760_microsoftcybercrimexml.html
So looks like Mike is against "combating cybercrime"! And WHERE is Google's new center, huh?
[ Note to the innocent who might wander in here: I'm again mocking Mike's actually pro-Google piece disguised under headline having "Microsoft". Of course, actually both mega-corporations are fully co-operating with NSA; "direct" access according to Snowden.]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Well, well. Maybe Mike was offsetting pro-Microsoft "news":
[ link to this | view in chronology ]