Prenda's Paul Duffy Claims To Be 'Too Devastated' By Nelson Mandela's Death To Comment
from the wtf dept
Yesterday, lawyer Nick Ranallo, one of the many lawyers who's been instrumental in taking down Prenda Law, filed a notice in the Navasca case, saying that they (he and his client, Joe Navasca) were satisfied that Prenda had paid up the attorneys fees owed, which Judge Chen had ordered back in July. The amount was $22,531.93, which is significantly less than other courts have told Prenda to fork over in other cases (totaling up to about $500,000 last I'd checked), and it appears that Team Prenda decided to fork over the cash, perhaps out of the nearly $2 million the company took in last year.But the really incredible part in this is that when reporter Joe Mullin, from Ars Technica, reached out to Prenda's Paul Duffy to comment on whether or not Prenda had paid up the fees, Duffy responded in the most bizarre way possible:
I hope you are doing well. I am devastated by the loss of Nelson Mandela and I hope you join with President Obama in remembering his legacy. He ranks with Mohandes Ghandi, Dr. King and President Kennedy in the struggle for human rights over the past 50 years. There are larger issues than the ability to steal porn... You seem like a nice guy. Thanks.Yes, the copyright porn trolling lawyer, whose firm has been implicated in setting up bogus honeypots to shake people down, in forging signatures and in efforts to publicly embarrass people (oh, and whose wife more or less admitted that her husband was engaged in interstate extortion) is now claiming that he's "devastated" by the loss of Mandela, and talking about "the struggle for human rights." That's a laugh. I'd guess he's a bit more devastated about the hundreds of thousands of dollars he's on the hook for and the criminal and tax evasion charges he may be facing before very long.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: joe navasca, nelson mandella, nick ranallo, paul duffy
Companies: prenda, prenda law
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Stealing porn
There are larger issues than obtaining settlements from people who "steal" porn, but look at all the money you've made doing just that. Then again, you seem like an asshole, so it's really no surprise. Thanks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Someone should make a movie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Someone should make a movie
Lawyers seem to have a need to over complicate things that should be relatively simple.
It would be called, Verbocracy. (TM, Copyrighted, Patent Pending... one time use licenses of my idea available for the low low price of $1 million bitcoins)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Someone should make a movie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Someone should make a movie
Also, because the world is run by lawyers, NOT being sued at least once a month would be 'felony interference of a business model'.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Someone should make a movie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Someone should make a movie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Someone should make a movie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is Duffy channeling...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The guy made it to 95 FFS! Thats a win in anyones book!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Small penis alert
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Creating "Excusable Neglect" here....
(Or was that "Excuses for Ignoring the court"?)
Where is THAT anonymous coward when you need her?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Creating "Excusable Neglect" here....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Creating "Excusable Neglect" here....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Creating "Excusable Neglect" here....
o_O
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I just thought I'd sow some doubt as to your identity if it is ever unmasked!
Now, I have to admit I like the counter theory of "Baffling e'm with Brilliant Bull****", just below, it would be sufficient!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I just thought I'd sow some doubt as to your identity if it is ever unmasked!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: More
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The perfect defense.
Caught cheating
Sorry, Mandela
Forgot to take out the trash
Sorry, Mandela
Traffic accident insurance exchange
Sorry, Mandela
Intoxicated indecent exposure
Sorry, Mandela
Busted with drugs
Sorry, Mandela
Murdering a hooker
Sorry, Mandela
Cooking meth
Sorry, Mandela
Break your drug dealers bong
Sorry, Mandela
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What he meant
FTFY, Paul Duffy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
GANDHI, not Ghandi. G - A- N - D - H - I.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
this is pretty low brow even for Masnick !!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Are you going to use windows 95 until the copyright expires?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Dirt - The fact they created the events to profit from.
Copyright - abusing an outdated law to extort money.
Anything else - The longest running comedy on the Judicial system where the staunch "defenders of copyright" are shown once again to be lying cheating idiots undone by a group of people online.
Or were you not keeping up with the story and just needed to flog your usual Mike bashing because it was time for you to feel special again?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Think about it. If the reporter quotes him he does not look guilty by having said 'No Comment'.
The response can not be used in a court of law as it looks and feels like it is the answer to some other question the reported pasted into as the answer to the ask question.
The answer tells you nothing about the case or anything else controversial either for that matter.
In fact this is exactly the response my ex boss (40 years ago and dead now) would give when we would go through customs in a foreign country especially South America. In a case of selective memory instantaneously he would forget any and all languages except Southern Red Neck English. He was fluent in a at least a dozen. All answers would become tourist nonsense. As far as equipment smuggling was concerned we would take literally truck loads of essential test equipment used for power plant construction into and out of countries with little or no correct paperwork while tourist had their bags inspected for the slightest custom violation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Sent to North America as punishment? :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
(Hey, if One Direction is also known as 1D...)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
December 14?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: sophisticatedjanedoe on Dec 7th, 2013 @ 9:01pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Considering that the only one of those three who was even alive in the past 50 years was Dr. King, I have to wonder what Mr. Duffy is thinking.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]