Most Big Internet Companies Speak Out For Major Surveillance Reform
from the about-time dept
Since the Snowden leaks began we've highlighted that the US internet companies should be furious about the NSA's actions, because it was almost certainly going to harm their ability to get any business outside of the US. Some of the companies seemed to be lying low, and we argued they should be speaking out and fighting back. While many of them did decide to sue for greater transparency, we argued that transparency was just one issue, and not even the most important one. About a month ago, with the revelations of the NSA infiltrating data centers, it appeared to finally dawn on the major internet companies that this was a serious issue.Basically all of the largest internet companies -- with the exception of Amazon
- Limiting Governments' Authority to Collect Users' Information
- Increase Oversight and Accountability (such as by making FISA an adversarial process)
- Transparency About Government Demands
- Respecting the Free Flow of Information
- Avoiding Conflicts Among Governments
We understand that governments have a duty to protect their citizens. But this summer’s revelations highlighted the urgent need to reform government surveillance practices worldwide. The balance in many countries has tipped too far in favor of the state and away from the rights of the individual — rights that are enshrined in our Constitution. This undermines the freedoms we all cherish. It’s time for a change.Some will, undoubtedly, argue that this is all just noise for the sake of public perception, but compare what these companies are doing to the major telco companies, which not only have refused to comment on all of this, but have actively fought efforts by their own shareholders to make them just slightly more transparent (up to the level many internet companies were even before the Snowden leaks).
For our part, we are focused on keeping users’ data secure — deploying the latest encryption technology to prevent unauthorized surveillance on our networks and by pushing back on government requests to ensure that they are legal and reasonable in scope.
We urge the US to take the lead and make reforms that ensure that government surveillance efforts are clearly restricted by law, proportionate to the risks, transparent and subject to independent oversight.
The question, now, is how much effort these companies will really put into getting Congress to change the laws. There are a number of different bills in Congress. Having the tech companies assist the efforts for real reform would certainly be helpful.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: internet, nsa, reform, surveillance, tech companies
Companies: aol, facebook, google, linkedin, microsoft, twitter
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
PR PR PR.
Just notice how these corporations are DOING what they claim NSA / gov't should not be: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/dec/9/tech-companies-call-end-nsa-online-snooping/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: PR PR PR.
if you don't like their business model of collecting your info in exchange for using their free services, stop being a freetard and vote with your wallet
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: PR PR PR.
02:46:36 [123-abc-1] (This line makes everyone laugh)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sure, they say they're bothered
That's the truth, and that's why nothing will ever change.
They can bitch, whine, moan, piss and groan all they want in public, but in private they'll be waiting for the next check from the government for all that access.
Plus, an odd note: why aren't the telcos in on this? Verizon and others would be amongst the prime players in this entire insanity, but nothing from them.
Guess they know where their bread is buttered.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sure, they say they're bothered
They've got no incentive to change this lucrative situation. If they weren't being paid to sell us out, they'd be on the anti-spying bandwagon in a flash.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sure, they say they're bothered
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What is the Point?
Is there a purpose to creating more law to do what another law already does? If they will break the current law then they will just break the new one.
The point here is to start voting them out, if you can't do that then don't vote at all or shut up the next time YOU are disenfranchised by the Law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What is the Point?
Really, the only votes worth casting when the system's that broken are with our feet or force of arms.
Representative democracy, isn't.
Though it tends to be one of the better systems when properly implimented. Having the representatives in lynching range of their constituents helps.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What is the Point?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What is the Point?
Now would be a good time to start researching and promoting possible candidates on your social media accounts so when the election season begins, you're ready. Back the most popular of the third party candidate, and you've got a reasonable chance of getting that person in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ISP's Notably Absent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ISP's Notably Absent
The stockholders are right though. Had I another choice AT&T would not be my ISP. As it is I limit their ability to collect data as much as possible. These stockholders are looking to the future. In that future, the damage by all this spying will be reflected on who gets what contracts where. What they are pulling in won't equal what they could be pulling in with a larger global presence. A presence I suspect will be dampened by their present actions in cahoots with the government.
One thing is sure, the NSAs days of rabid spying and unlimited expansion is going to be pinched back. Obama claims he's going to do it but I believe him about like I believe that lake out there is magically going to turn to steam today and be an ice skating rink tonight. Since he's been a wholesale supporter of this spying I have to assume he's said that to limit the reigning in as much as possible, not because he actually wants change. He's looking for the minimal necessary to satisfy the public resentment while continuing business as usual.
It's high time to fire Clapper and haul his butt to court over lying to the Senate Intelligence Committee with his least untruthful answer. It's time to have a general booting of butts in that agency, removing all the tainted people that have now been exposed to this travesty of respecting the public's privacy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: ISP's Notably Absent
It's no surprise that they behave this way. It's part of their DNA.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FYI: Apple IS a part of this, too
And this article, pointing out the need for *corporate* surveillance reform as well, was unexpectedly good, and seems like something most folks here would agree with: http://mobile.betanews.com/betanews/#!/entry/tech-giants-surveillance-reform-rally-is-disingenuous-a nd-selfserving,52a618a0025312186c9b8070
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: FYI: Apple IS a part of this, too
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I was a little disappointed that there's no article about the revelation that Google are funding scumbags like Grover Norquist and other Nazis masquerading as Republicans. I love seeing Google aligned with sleaze weasels like the Koch brothers. Nothing better to mark the "Don't be evil" guys as world class hypocrites.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I joke, the US will ever accept any investor dispute resolution settlements against the US. That's not what these trade agreements are for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]