Applicant For UND Head Football Coach Cites Video Game Experience As His Qualifications
from the dive-dive-bomb dept
Many of my fellow Americans enjoy the sport of football and their professional and collegiate leagues, the NFL and the NCAA. If you're like me, you often opine that you could run the team, the program, or the franchise in immeasurably greater fashion than the millionaire chowderheads currently employed to do so. If you're also like me, you play football video games and, oddly, learn quite a bit about the game from them. That, however, is usually as far as this type of thing goes.
Unlike me, however, Christopher McComas decided that all of these things have somehow merged together to make him the perfect fit for the University of North Dakota's vacant head football coach position. Having noticed on Twitter that UND was looking for a new head coach, he submitted his resume. His plan, such as it is, is undeniably interesting:
My football philosophy is basically an attacking one. We're going to give AIR RAID a whole new definition. Theoretically how many times do you think a team can pass in a game? Challenge accepted. We're going 5 wide, chucking the pigskin all over the place. Never punt. Onside every time. Chip Kelly will be calling me to learn my offense. We will put on an exciting brand of football, we will pack them into the Alerus Center night in and night out, go ahead and blow the roof off the place and add about 35,000 seats to that place.To many of us, this philosophy is quite familiar. We often see it employed by every ten-year-old we play in an online version of Madden or NCAA Football. This, as McComas 9 page PowerPoint he sent to UND Athletic Director Brian Faison to justify his hiring, is so recognizable for a reason.
Now, I can't say for sure that Mr. Faison will find these video game credentials as underwhelming as I (Thurman Thomas a God? Even God couldn't do that!), but it seems quite unlikely that they'll get McComas hired. Also, his plan to be good by "winning a lot of games" seems more like a goal than a plan, but what do I know?
Either way, it's useful to remember as we head into the holiday season and the TV glow is full of sports (for some of us, at least), there's always someone better out there, even if that means being better at foolishly stating how great we'd be if we were in charge of our favorite teams.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: christopher mccomas, football, university of north dakota, video games
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
http://fifthdown .blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/17/a-new-study-on-fourth-downs-go-for-it/
http://www.newyorker.com/online/ blogs/sportingscene/2012/08/to-punt-or-not-to-punt.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/19/sports/foot ball/calculating-footballs-risk-of-not-punting-on-fourth-down.html
I say try him. Never anything to lose from a publicity stunt.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
For example, if you are the 2012 Redskins, you might as well punt. You are not going to get a score anyway. On the other hand, if you are the 1985 Bears, you should go for it no matter where on the field you are. Your defense will get you the ball back in better field position anyway.
The high school football coach that doesn't return punts would be a fool if he had a player on his team that simply never fumbled. On the other hand, if everyone on his team drops the ball all the time, then he would be a fool to attempt to return a punt.
The New Yorker article is right though. NFL coaches are more concerned with keeping their jobs than with winning games.
The dude applying for the job should be laughed at. Calling plays is the least important part of a coaches job. The real part is teaching the team to work together and taking advantage of the strengths of all the players while minimizing the weaknesses. Play calling almost anyone could do.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Let him try...
On the OTHER hand, if he succeeds, that'll be interesting as well, even if not likely.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Also, go Bison!
[ link to this | view in thread ]