Copyright Strikes Again: No Online Access To UK Internet Archive
from the you're-doing-it-wrong dept
Last week we wrote about how Norway had come up with a way to provide online access to all books in Norwegian, including the most recent ones, available to anyone in the country. Here, by contrast, is how not to do it, courtesy of publishers in the UK:
The UK is preparing to launch its official internet archive without internet access, after the publishing industry put restrictions on its release.
In my post about the Norwegian system, I joked about what form a typical copyright maximalist approach to providing online access to a nation's heritage might take:
The archive was held up by a decade of negotiations between publishers and the British Library, meaning that regulations permitting the library to perform its first archive copy of every UK website were not passed until April this year, more than 20 years since the World Wide Web took off and 10 years since Parliament passed a law making it possible.available in a specially constructed room deep in the basement of the National Library on a (small) screen, and with guards stationed either side of it to ensure that no unauthorized copies were made.
Little did I suspect that reality was way ahead of me, as the story in Computer Weekly quoted above explains:
The British Library gave the first demonstration of the UK internet archive to publishers last week, to demonstrate how it would meet their restrictions that the only people who could see it were those privileged few people eligible for readers' passes at one of the UK's six major academic libraries -- and only then one at a time, in person, at a terminal in the library.
What's particularly tragic here is that the ten years of foot-dragging and obstructionism by the British publishers has resulted in a loss of countless millions of older Web pages that are now probably gone for ever -- and with them, a key part of the UK's early digital heritage. Once again, we see that contrary to the dogma, copyright does not always promote culture, but can destroy it, too.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: access, copyright, internet archive, uk
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Maybe not, but they have bought enough politicians and laws to game the system in their favor, such that a threat of bankrupting any and all that even might infringe upon the 'holy copyright' is usually enough to keep progress that otherwise might have occurred(like here), to a standstill or crawl.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
Anyway, this has NOTHING to do your strawman "dogma" that copyright is to promote culture. Sheesh. How anyone can look at the mountains of CRAP produced and call it "culture" is a lesson in overweening weenie-ism. -- Copyright is to allow the creators of that CRAP to profit from it, in a market which is FREE because regulated to prevent others who did NOT produce even crap from profiting off it. Period. Copyright is neutral at best about culture, It's only your FOOL notions that set it up on some high pedestal, and I think you do that only to knock it off. -- And to be clear, if people want to consume crap (up to common law limits, Max Hardcore being WELL over the line), then that's their right, even if I don't approve. -- But it's NOT anyone's right to just take that copyrighted content. -- Nor is anyone noticeably deprived by not being able to see this content which they never knew existed! Completely minion's pseudo-idealist, "my youth was the best times ever in history of the world" fantasy.
Dilbert's view of Techdirt: http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2009-11-17/
08:26:35[j-677-8]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
Culture - one more word Blue doesn't understand.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2009-11-17/
say again
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
"Look at this pocket watch. It's worthless. Ten dollars from a vendor in the street. But I take it, I bury it in the sand for a thousand years, it becomes priceless! Like the Ark. Men will kill for it; men like you and me."
This same attitude of yours is why 70% of all silent films are now lost - either people thought they were crap not worth preserving, or didn't have the rights to make copies so that they could be preserved.
The first 20 years of silent film is a lot like the first 20 years of the internet. It sure would be nice to have that stuff still around a hundred years from now, never mind a 1,000.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
I found this an interesting statement. I researched it and found that many were lost in fires or the medium used was not durable. What strikes me is that when you copyright a piece you send a copy to the library of congress. Please enlighten me on how this process dooms it to be lost by mankind.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
Not always. Have a look here
http://gizmodo.com/most-of-hollywoods-silent-films-are-lost-and-gone-fore-1476381251
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
Thank you for this Rikuo. Many of those films were not regarded as worth keeping, or the copyright holders didn't think it was economically viable to maintain them. We shouldn't presume the garbage of today will be the garbage of tomorrow.
And it's interesting that LAB mentions the Library of Congress. I recently watched a series of early silent films that were preserved only because they were submitted to the Library of Congress. To copyright them, they had to print each frame of the film out on paper, and these paper archives were used to reconstruct the films (the picture quality was amazing). They also talked about how the studio's logos were painted directly onto the sets so people wouldn't plagiarize the films.
The first copyrighted film was Fred Ott's Sneeze in 1894, submitted to the Library of Congress in paper print outs. If maximalists had their way, we'd still be paying the Edison estate (i.e. General Electric) for the privilege to see what is basically a five second gif of a man sneezing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
The reason Hollywood is Hollyywod is that is where the film makers went so that they DID NOT have to pay Edison. That right the film industry is not only built on using public domain works, (hello Disney), but also pirated Edison's patented technology, to avoid his influence and control over film making.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
What? That's not right. That's not right at all.
A) Copyright is granted 'upon creation'.
B) Last I checked the Library of Congress is somewhere else and has working hours and a door.
C) It's the end of 2013, do we even need the Library of Congress like that? It's not like it's helping anything.
Enlighten me as to how engorging on the fountain of restrictions helps humanity even a little.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
Wikipedia: Legal deposit
For further information on the deposit requirement in the United States, see 17 U.S.C. § 407.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
The law used to be that you had to submit a copy. That was changed a while back. Anything you put into a fixed form in the US is automatically copyrighted without any further action on your part.
Registering your copyright (which does involve submitting a copy) is optional, but gives you additional legal powers if you do it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
So you are saying that there is no such thing as an orphan work?
Your comment was copyrighted as soon as it was written, did you send a copy to the Library?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
It seemed like a good idea at the time but it's become one of the biggest problems with copyright law causes of piracy, because if you want to ask permission to use something, you very often can't even find out who to ask. There is no central database anymore. The Copyright Office seems to have completely given up making such a database available.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
You should understand that mandatory deposit for the Library of Congress is not the same as copyright registration.
See the U.S. Copyright Office's FAQ on Mandatory Deposit:
Not only are there different sections of Title 17 for mandatory deposit and registration, but they are regulated separately under 37 C.F.R. Part 202.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
See the exemption in 37 C.F.R. 202.19(c)(5). (Under the authority of 17 U.S.C. § 407(c) ).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
If they only have one copy, and that goes, game over.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
...says the guy who who mourns at the thought that movie companies might not be able to afford to make half-billion dollar action movies.
Here's a little clue: "culture" has nothing to do with whether something is subjectively good or bad. "Culture" is the collection of things and behaviors that constitute our collective identity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Lost web pages "tragic"? Oy, you got some wild notions, minion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Excellent. Where will we keep it?"
"In a box, in the basement."
"But then how will anyone ever access it?"
"Why would they want to do that?"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"Oh yes, well as soon as I heard I went straight round to see them, yesterday afternoon. You hadn't exactly gone out of your way to call attention to them, had you? I mean, like actually telling anybody or anything."
"But the plans were on display ..."
"On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them."
"That's the display department."
"With a flashlight."
"Ah, well the lights had probably gone."
"So had the stairs."
"But look, you found the notice didn't you?"
"Yes," said Arthur, "yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of the Leopard'."
- The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, by Douglas Adams
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
this is the sort of thing that that fucking idiot Cameron ought to be concerned about and concentrating on correcting, instead of using children as an excuse to enable the continuation of total spying on UK and other nations citizens!! this is how he repays the UK for making him Prime Minister!! Geez!! what a prick!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
books
"The most valuable data is a collection of ebooks from 2003-2011, a 133GB haul which the artist claims has a value of $300,000."
If anything i suspect there is a file with every book ever published , broken up into a few parts for everyone to download, seriously when the publishers do silly things with their monopoly they do not take into account the ramifications of ignoring what people want in return for that monopoly, the same as has happened with music and movies where everyone or almost everyone downloads movies free on a daily basis, or a few a year if they only want to download decent movies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Offtopic Question
Do the comments that the community has pressed the report button enough to have them hidden get picked up by the search engine crawlers? Or are they filtered out?
I hope it's the latter. I can't imagine what some random Googler might think Techdirt is about if Blue's comments keep popping up in search results.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Offtopic Question
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Offtopic Question
Maybe, but that comment was just recently flagged. Try a Google search on reported comments for older articles and those seem to be lot tougher to find.
The only reason I stumbled across this and wanted to ask was because I was searching for something that I was 99% sure Blue had said in the past and had trouble finding it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Offtopic Question
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Offtopic Question
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Offtopic Question
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...in a disused lavatory. In the basement. The power is out, use a torch. It's next to the sign "Beware the Leopard."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What the.. ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What the.. ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What the.. ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: What the.. ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
who are these people?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: who are these people?
I don't recall being informed of this insidious activity, much less invited to comment.
"They" = Rupert Murdoch. Who else?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I had been planning to leave it to the British Library. This has changed my mind about that. Now I'll probably sell it to a Chinese billionaire instead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]