Obama Says James Clapper 'Should Have Been More Careful' In How He Lied To Congress

from the ridiculous dept

Many of us are still quite disappointed that James Clapper has kept his job as Director of National Intelligence after flat out lying to Congress over whether or not the NSA spied on Americans. There have been increasing calls from within Congress to have Clapper investigated and possibly prosecuted for the felony of lying to Congress, but there appears to be no movement there at all. Not only does the Obama administration seem to want to protect one of their own, but it's also made it clear that something like that would make it look like Ed Snowden "won" and they can't allow that sort of thing.

CNN's Jake Tapper finally got President Obama to "address" the issue in an interview, and the best that Obama could muster was that Clapper "should have been more careful" in how he lied to Congress:
“I think that Jim Clapper himself would acknowledge, and has acknowledged, that he should have been more careful about how he responded,” Obama told CNN’s Jake Tapper. “His concern was that he had a classified program that he couldn't talk about and he was in an open hearing in which he was asked, he was prompted to disclose a program, and so he felt that he was caught between a rock and a hard place.”
I'm wondering if anyone else charged with a felony for lying to Congress will now be able to use that excuse: yes, yes, they should have been more careful in how they lied to Congress.

As for the "rock and a hard place" claim, that's also simply untrue. Clapper knew full well the question was coming and also knew full well that he could easily respond by saying a variety of things, such as "I can only fully answer that question in a closed hearing." Clapper knows he can do this because he's done it many times before. In fact, he did it just this week when asked another question by Senator Wyden about the NSA's activities. He specifically said that he was uncomfortable discussing such details in an open hearing but would be happy to discuss them during a closed session. And, in fact, Clapper had done similar things in previous sessions, as is clear from the correspondences between him and Wyden that pre-dated the hearing where he lied.

For example, take a look at a letter Clapper sent in 2011 to Senator Ron Wyden, in which he states: "the questions you pose on geolocational information are difficult to answer in an unclassified letter." He was able to do that in 2011 and no parade of horribles followed. It did not reveal any "sources and methods" of classified intelligence. He easily could have done the same thing in 2013 when asked.

There was no rock. There was no hard place. Clapper didn't need to "be more careful." He lied. Which is a felony. And the President is excusing it because he doesn't want Snowden to "win."
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: barack obama, felony, james clapper, lying to congress, nsa, ron wyden, surveillance


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2014 @ 1:03pm

    Obama == Lawless!

    I wonder if that would work for the next criminal(s) that rob a bank because they are caught between a rock and a hard place.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Mike Taylor (profile), 31 Jan 2014 @ 1:14pm

    What a desperate disappointment Obama has turned out to be

    "Yes we can" seems a very, very long time ago.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      John Fenderson (profile), 31 Jan 2014 @ 2:59pm

      Re: What a desperate disappointment Obama has turned out to be

      "Yes we can" is still an operable slogan. It's just that by "we", he meant his administration, not the people.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Jerrymiah, 31 Jan 2014 @ 8:05pm

      Re: What a desperate disappointment Obama has turned out to be

      I think he would do well though as President of a Banana Republic.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    crade (profile), 31 Jan 2014 @ 1:22pm

    To be fair, saying "I can only fully answer that question in a closed hearing" is exactly what Obama meant by "should have been more careful" in how he responded. Then he could lie in the closed hearing where it would never be vetted.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Loki, 31 Jan 2014 @ 1:26pm

    something like that would make it look like Ed Snowden "won"

    It doesn't need to "look like", the fact is he has "won". We have the evidence, so now we actually *know* that every time they open their mouths they are lying, deceiving, and being duplicitous instead of just suspecting it.

    The only reason they don't see that as a "win" is because they have all still managed to retain their jobs somehow.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 1 Feb 2014 @ 2:44am

      Re:

      NSA is part of the government agencies and thus under the control of il presidente. Any critizism voiced against those entities will be taken by the opposition and used against him.

      In this case, the picture the government is painting is Snowden as a traitor and NSA as virtuous and dilligent servants of the people. If Clapper was actually investigated for lying to congress, the president could face a problem from opposition* because his beautyful romantic picture would crack completely

      *Not republicans or democrats. Real opposition is increasingly one not consisting of political parties. Opposition is a coalition of lobbying entities, whether media, direct person to person lobbying or narrative control through think tanks with their "research" and narratives.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    AricTheRed (profile), 31 Jan 2014 @ 1:39pm

    OMG OMG OMG LOOK AT THIS!

    ‘Pot odor’ leads to search of Bieber’s Super Bowl-party jet in NJ

    HSI/ICE doing "It's job"

    Now we just need som federal LAW ENFORCEMENT to investigate and impeach the lying bastids! in Washington and Ft Meade!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    krolork (profile), 31 Jan 2014 @ 1:42pm

    We need a revolution.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2014 @ 1:45pm

    Obama is in no position to criticize Clapper for lying about something that Obama lied about himself -- many times over.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vixVPE4LBAU

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Trip W (profile), 31 Jan 2014 @ 1:47pm

    They don't want to let Snowden 'win'... in the meantime, they continue to prove that the American people have 'lost' in this whole thing.

    'Lost' our freedoms, 'lost' our faith that our elected officials are competent and at all trustworthy, and 'lost' hope that any of it is going to change any time soon.

    Can we screw everything up and somehow all keep our jobs? 'Yes we can!'

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2014 @ 2:05pm

    We are a nation of men, not laws.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2014 @ 2:16pm

    OR... instead of deliberately trying to deceive the American public, by hiding what he knew was a completely illegal program behind a lie, with the hopes that he would simply be accepted at his word, he could have responded "This is a question, I can't answer in a public hearing due to the classified nature of the program."

    Again, the only reason to lie, is because he KNEW it was an illegal program. An illegal program that would have nearly every American citizen upset if they were to be informed about it. These people use secret courts to get the rulings they desire, then call it legal. Examples need to be set so that people in these same positions in the future will think "I could end up in prison for the next 20 years, so maybe I should err on the side of protecting our constitutional rights", and that's the reason why this man needs to go to jail.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    edpo, 31 Jan 2014 @ 2:19pm

    Clapped Llied and Broke the Law

    Of course Obama will protect Clapper. After all, if the lies of one result in accountability, there's a fear that the lies of the other will as well. And I voted for Obama twice. The President has not only been a disappointment personally, he's broken our social contract and our Constitutional obligations repeatedly. The guy is just another political scumbag at the end of the day.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2014 @ 2:46pm

      Re: Clapped Llied and Broke the Law

      The question is, which is worse - a president who campaigns as a law-and-order nationalist and keeps his promise, or a president who campaigns as a freedom-loving leftist and breaks his promise?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        John Fenderson (profile), 31 Jan 2014 @ 3:00pm

        Re: Re: Clapped Llied and Broke the Law

        Six of one, half dozen of the other.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2014 @ 4:55pm

          Re: Re: Re: Clapped Llied and Broke the Law

          Does honesty - or lack of - not count for anything?

          link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            John Fenderson (profile), 3 Feb 2014 @ 10:38am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Clapped Llied and Broke the Law

            Of course it does. But so does actual results. If the honest nationalist and the dishonest populist both work towards the same end, then there is no operational difference between them, and neither has an edge for or against my vote.

            link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2014 @ 2:36pm

    And the buck is still going and going and going , it's bee passed so many times we'll lucky to see a nickle.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2014 @ 6:57pm

    Stalingrad happened, and NSA still in denial. Where does that end?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    doctordrewl, 31 Jan 2014 @ 8:25pm

    Crime is crime.

    So let's get this straight... the gov't is free to violate any law... as long as it's done under the umbrella of national security or state secrecy. Good thing we do everything possible to keep people with a potential conflict of interest out of the halls of power... oh wait!? Maybe that's why someone would spend several billion dollars to get a job that pays $400K a year.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Just Sayin', 31 Jan 2014 @ 10:20pm

    Now you are just making stuff up

    Honestly, Obama didn't say "Should Have Been More Careful In How He Lied To Congress". He said he should have been more careful with how he answered. His answers may or may not have been lies (history will possibly tell us) but really, Obama didn't call him a liar.

    I know, it's your "opinion", but perhaps you could phrase it a bit better and stop trying to write link bait headlines to please Google.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Michael Donnelly (profile), 31 Jan 2014 @ 11:08pm

    Nice headline, Mike.

    No sarcasm here. I was actually laughing out loud before reading the body of the post, since I knew what was coming.

    Comedy gold.

    Well, except the part where we're making fun of how these highly-ranked government officials live in a world devoid of consequences for their actions. But it's still a damn funny headline.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    @b, 2 Feb 2014 @ 5:36pm

    stand by ur man

    sharp talk of lies is to digress!
    when pardoned spies deride Congress!
    top secrets obscure their growing cloak!
    spying over-reach! Claptrap meta mispoke!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    John A. Phillips, 7 Feb 2014 @ 5:33pm

    On Political Corruption & The Preservation of Liberty

    No accountability!!! And the American
    people do not have the backbone or moral
    courage to hold any U.S. agency or U.S.
    politician accountable.Then Americans get
    exactly what they deserve. America is about
    pro-active democracy that extends far beyond
    just voting, as it was intended since it's beginning.
    If we are not pro-active, and demand accountability from
    the President on down we don't deserve to be called Americans. We now have a political federal system so deeply
    corrupt as a consequence.
    "What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?" - Thomas Jefferson

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    John A. Phillips, 7 Feb 2014 @ 7:14pm

    On Political Corruption & The Preservation of Liberty

    As an critical note; on December 31, 2011, Obama signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012. Among it's many provisions of command & control over the U.S. and it's citizens that the Government had entitled itself to, is the permanent revocation of Habeas Corpus - one of the very few cherished foundations that critically defines our Western Democracy. Upon reviewing the NDAA/2012, Ramsay Clark stated that "Most Americans do not realize that we are now under military rule." Folks, our country is now in great danger by forces within our own government - uncontrollable and unaccountable, and the intelligence communities' surveillance and spying against it's own citizenry is just the beginning, and part of a much larger program that has been kept from public knowledge.

    "When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

    I hope it's not too late!

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.