Study Shockingly Suggests Internet Trolls May Not Be Very Nice Or Particularly Mentally Healthy In Real Life
from the you-don't-say dept
A new study from the University of Manitoba has shockingly claimed to have found that the Internet trolls we all know or love so well may not be very nice -- or particularly mentally healthy -- individuals in real life. The study tried to explore whether or not Internet trolls fell into the so called Dark Tetrad: Machiavellianism (willingness to manipulate and deceive others), narcissism (egotism and self-obsession), psychopathy (the lack of remorse and empathy), and sadism (pleasure in the suffering of others). The study (mostly survey, really) claims to have found:"... correlations, sometimes quite significant, between these traits and trolling behavior. What’s more, it also found a relationship between all Dark Tetrad traits (except for narcissism) and the overall time that an individual spent, per day, commenting on the Internet."It's worth noting that the survey found, by and large, that most people online are perfectly reasonable and decent human beings. At the very least they're just quiet lurkers:
"To be sure, only 5.6 percent of survey respondents actually specified that they enjoyed "trolling." By contrast, 41.3 percent of Internet users were “non-commenters,” meaning they didn’t like engaging online at all. So trolls are, as has often been suspected, a minority of online commenters, and an even smaller minority of overall Internet users."The study appears to rely heavily on subjects pulled from Amazon's Mechanical Turk, who may not be a good control representative of what constitutes normal behavior, either online or off. The study also appears to be rather heavily reliant on simply asking people if they liked to be jerks on the Internet -- which if I were an Internet troll, I'm not sure I'd answer correctly. Reading their analysis and methodology, it's not clear to me if the researchers did (or could) calculate how anonymity can turn a relatively normal person into a blathering jackass (as this classic Penny Arcade comic illustrates in deep scientific detail).
Is somebody necessarily a sadist offline because anonymity turns them into a jerk when they're online? Isn't it possible that people act worse online because the sense of anonymity gives them the belief they're free from repercussion and can therefore experiment with darker, but not necessarily dominant, aspects of their personality they'd fear to explore offline? Wouldn't that especially be true of children, who may express anger at their lack of power through online rage, but develop into perfectly normal people as they age?
You can dig through the full methodology yourself, assuming you're smart enough, professor. Those shoes make you look fat. I'd also like to point out that the Beatles sucked, Internet Explorer is the vastly superior browser, the RIAA makes a lot of solid points based on sound scientific data, the Comcast merger will help cure cancer and save puppies, and my little sister is much better than you are at this game, bro.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: psychology, study, troll, university of manitoba
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Study shockingly suggests that dogs have good hearing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm not surprised at the amount of people that lurk or the amount that troll by the numbers given. They actually support what you normally see as a slice of net life.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"scientists say trolls are vicious sadists"
Trolls say "thank you, good sir".
i don't think i'm a sadist, i can barely beat my wife as hard as she prefers, i just enjoy seeing stupid people dringing themselves to stroke over things people say to them on the interwebz.
or herping deserving derps...if i don't make fun of anti vaxxers, creationists, lawyers and other scum...who will?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I have trolled a few times when people are being stupid about something but only a few times and only when i am pissed of with life in general...saying that i think the last time i trolled someone was years ago...family life being what it is i rarely get time to waste on the internet and when i do i would rather spend it having fun not trolling people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
tl;dr of all tl;dr
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thanks Obama!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Character
If you're a nice person who turns into a flaming jerkwad when you think nobody can know who you are, you're not in fact a nice person. You're just a flaming jerkwad who's good at covering it up because you'd be ashamed for people to know you're a flaming jerkwad. This is why so many "apologies" for incredibly stupid unintentionally-public statements are phrased the way they are: the people who made them aren't actually ashamed to have made the statement, they're just ashamed that their having said it became public knowledge.
NB: everybody has at least a bit of this flaw in them. The key is to just man up and accept this fact. It'll get you a bit more respect, and give you the chance to direct your attitude at targets that've done something to deserve it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Character
So light 'em up, up, up
Light 'em up, up, up
Light 'em up, up, up...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Character
Tell security we gonna tear this club up
GIRL YOU KNOW I LIKE THE WAY YOU SHAKE IT IN DEM JEANS!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Character
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Character
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Insulting?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Insulting?
Sorry, when I see a slow pitch I have to swing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous is a flaw
Somewhere, someone has something on you. No matter what anyone says there is no true hiding on-line anymore.
So one can troll all you like. Just be careful of where it is you do it, because karma is a bitch if you cross the wrong line and piss off the wrong person. Your IP can be traced to a physical address. ISPs can track you down.
So be a jerk, narcissistic and savage all you want. Just don't complain when it catches up to you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Anonymous is a flaw
yes he had a changing ip address yes he could use encryption software yes he could complain...but at the time i could not monitor him, i was trolling ad in a good way i think.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Anonymous is a flaw
Implying everything on the internet is to be taken seriously. Implying just because you take it personally that it is personal. Implying a person will be tracked down because of your butthurt.
The real narcissists are the ones who believe it's all about them. The ones who expect and demand that the world revolves around their butthurt so everyone must act accordingly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Anonymous is a flaw (Am not!)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Anonymous is a flaw
If I was gonna do anything that could bite me in the ass, it'd be done through someone elses ip
But you're probably right as most trolls are idiots
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Anonymous is a flaw
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trolling is an art. Usually done for fun.
The only real question is....does the target deserve it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Erm, you do know that mocking a public figure is not trolling, right? The word means something totally different.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The old trolls were actually funny, but these days you can call every annoying fucker a troll so it kinda lost its meaning.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Why do they call it an Xbox 360? Because you wanna turn around 360 degrees and walk away!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
chrysler had built tanks and who-knows-what through the war years and wanted to hit the ground running when they returned to producing autos. the survey was a new idea, and chrysler hired one of the polling agencies to find out what kind of car america wanted. so the agency simply asked people what sort of car they wanted, and sensible, boxsy cars resulted. check out the '50 plymouth, say. and the company almost went under, so i was told.
the pollsters didn't give up. they redesigned the survey and asked people what the neighbor across the street wanted. long, low, fast, and impressive. lots of gadgets. check out the '57 plymouth, say. saved the company, so i was told.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OR... Are trolls the healthy ones...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: OR... Are trolls the healthy ones...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
see
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Sure, they did a couple things that everyone thought was good, but that's largely only because they happened to troll people that a majority of society consider morally reprehensible. Try to suggest that this is what they should be doing, and you'll see the fanboys crawl out of the woodwork, whining that "Anonymous isn't your personal army".
Which is just as well. Nobody wants a personal army whose sole aim is to dox you for laughs, ruin your reputation in any way possible, and harass you just for questioning their methodologies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
So yes, they were their own worst enemy, falling on their own double-edged sword.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Sounds like someone's a fanboy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Internet Trolls
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Internet Trolls
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ouch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It also seems very self-serving to say "someone made me mad. Therefore he has problems [in real life]". Because wouldn't that make you feel good? To have some dirt IRL next time that troll pops up. Probably not going to happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why I do it
The big thing is this: being nice, polite, and sweet didn't get me the attention I'm so desperate for. But you know what does? Being an asshole. Instant success. Because people will always feed the trolls. Now that my little episode or whatever is over, I'm content but I /can't stop/ doing it. It's addictive. And these people I'm going after--reporting their stories and slamming their work with my sockpuppet account when in reality I don't care if they're against guidelines--most of them pissed me off.
They said they were going to check my work out, or did and said "can't wait to read it!" then disappeared and still happily post their work and get /tons/ of praise. It makes me so insanely angry and jealous that it feels so good to finally knock them down a peg. Fucking people always ignore and discard me when I try SO HARD and do EVERYTHING RIGHT.
One girl I reported, then used my real account and expressed my condolences over having been trolled. Bitch. I felt bad that I did it at first, that's why I tried to remedy it, but the next day I kept on trolling.
I know what I'm doing is wrong, but for now I just can't stop.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why I do it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
//
huehuehue
this title is enough to prove this theory wrong :3
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
you're a big fat liar for claimin' that, dickwad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]