Survey: 27% Think A Gigabyte Is a Type Of South American Insect [Update: Or Not]
from the I-see-dumb-people dept
Update: Or not. It appears that this survey may be bogus. Still, the key point, that we've noted for years, is that the average person has no idea how much a gigabyte really is -- and we'd bet that's still true, even if this "survey" appears to be just a marketing stunt.A new survey from a UK company unsurprisingly found that more than a few people are slightly clueless when it comes to technology terms. The multiple-choice survey, which polled 2,392 U.S. men and women 18 years of age or older, found that one in ten Americans believe that html is some form of sexually-transmitted disease. While most survey respondents knew the definition of more general terms (like "dialect"), the full survey (pdf) found that even basic tech terms confused many people. 42% thought a motherboard was a deck on a cruise ship, 15% thought that software was comfortable clothing, and 77% of respondents didn't know what SEO meant.
Interestingly, while 67% respondents knew that a gigabyte was a unit of measurement of digital information (though the survey didn't ask them how much information is contained in a gigabyte), 27% believed that a gigabyte was a type of South American insect. That's actually a better statistic than I've seen in the past. A 2008 poll suggested that 87% of those polled had no idea what a gigabyte was or how many they use. The New York Times did an entirely unscientific street poll a few years back and found that few, if any, passers by knew what a megabyte is:
"If a sampling of pedestrians on the streets of Brooklyn is any guide, most people have only a vague idea. One said a megabyte was “the amount of something we have to use the Internet,” adding, “We should have three or four." Miranda Popkey, 24, was closer: “It’s a measure of how much information you store. If there are too many of them, I can’t send my e-mail attachment."The thing is, most people can get away with not knowing what a motherboard is without losing a limb. Thinking that USB is an acronym for a country in Europe may not make you the smartest person in the room, but it's not going to hurt your wallet. Even the 29% of survey respondents who thought a migraine was a type of rice should probably make it through the day without any major repercussions (assuming they don't choke on their own tongue or something). But with both fixed line and wireless carriers increasingly charging by the megabyte and gigabyte, people might want to brush up on the term before they have to take out a second mortgage to fund their Angry Birds habit.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 14th, 2014 @ 6:50pm
When I went to public high school in 1990, they were just getting a real computer education program setup with the cutting edge 286 pc clones.
Hell, just the year before in middle school, we eere still on 2e's!
Some people never had the chance to learn computers in public schools.
Instead of blaming the schools, I blame those that didn't strive to learn something so important after the fact!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 14th, 2014 @ 6:50pm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hoax
The survey was supposed conducted by or for a company that specializes in viral marketing. Last I checked, they finally released what they claim were the actual questions, but nothing on the methodology.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Do me a favor, Karl. Take a quick trip to Netflix and find me information on the amount of data will be used to play the video about to stream.
Okay, now head to Facebook and see if you can find a quick reference on the data push there. Amazon? Techdirt?
I've learned long ago people don't care about space and limits. All they care about is accessing content. When customers get bill shocked, they'll simply cut back on frivolous websites like Techdirt and The Wall Street Journal so they can spend more time on Facebook without punishment.
Because a website doesn't tell people how much data it's pushing, nor does it engage people with caution notices a stream is going to be over 500MB. People don't realize the true impact of many images over the course of time.
All they want is to access it.
I understand the point you're trying to make, but I think you're overshadowing the true culprit here: websites don't state how much data they're pushing because to do so may actually get visitors to leave, and not come back.
Instead of trying to blame consumers, blame the carriers and ISPs who are purposely gouging customers because they're well aware how much data they're using, and precisely where to cap them.
Educate them to fight this stupidity, not learn what a gigabyte is.
That's my job, as a web developer, as it's necessary to streamline the content with as little as data as possible since it also costs us to push it.
:)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 14th, 2014 @ 6:50pm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Except they don't...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 14th, 2014 @ 6:50pm
Now, how many people are clueless as to what type of
computer that is?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
But Is That A Gigabyte Or A Gibibyte?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Yes, even if the educational system sucks and you are somewhat lacking knowledge, the obvious thing to do is whine and bemoan your situation rather than picking up a book and begin fixing the problem.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Except they don't...
How does it "show" this?
Responders could easily know the correct answer and yet provide an incorrect one because they find it humorous.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: But Is That A Gigabyte Or A Gibibyte?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A special message for you
0100100000011101000110111100100000011001000111 00100110
100101101110011010110010000001111001011011110111010101
11001000100000010011110111011001100001 0110110001110100
01101001011011100110010100101110
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why did you forget to say how much a Gigabyte is?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Why did you forget to say how much a Gigabyte is?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Why did you forget to say how much a Gigabyte is?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Why did you forget to say how much a Gigabyte is?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Why did you forget to say how much a Gigabyte is?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Oh wait...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: they just don't give a shit.
It may not have mattered much when we could fudge the meaning of a “K” to 2-3%, but it’s getting harder to ignore now.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 1 Gigabyte is 1024 Megabytes
If an async comms channel can transmit 1 bit per second with a 1Hz clock, how fast can it transmit with a 1GHz clock?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A special message for you
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: 1 Gigabyte is 1024 Megabytes
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 1 Gigabyte is 1024 Megabytes
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: 1 Gigabyte is 1024 Megabytes
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: 1 Gigabyte is 1024 Megabytes
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Indeed. I would estimate the percentage of people needed further education at 100%. Anyone who claims they know it all are clearly incorrect. But that is not the point.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: But Is That A Gigabyte Or A Gibibyte?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: But Is That A Gigabyte Or A Gibibyte?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Many things
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A special message for you
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Just under 120MB/s
If a product was advertised to you as doing 125MiB/s, and it turned out it only did 125MB/s (or worse still, “just under 120MB/s” as you claimed), would you feel ripped off?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: o one I know in the tech community uses those terms either
If your “tech community” were to design a comms channel that can transmit 1 bit per second with a 1Hz clock, how fast could it transmit with a 1GHz clock?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A special message for you
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How much is a watt? What?
How many feet in a mile?
Were these questions asked as well?
A lot of people eat food, ask them where it comes from.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: o one I know in the tech community uses those terms either
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: o one I know in the tech community uses those terms either
What is this approximation you speak of?
There are differences in methodology, but each method is concise. I do not see any approximation.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
creative designe
creative printing
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: o one I know in the tech community uses those terms either
"So how does your “tech community” calculate how many hertz there are in a gigahertz?"
As the AC said, this prefix business is a mess. However, the rule I was taught was that you determine exactly what these prefixes mean (the same problem exists with kilo-, mega-, tera-, etc) from context: if you're talking about units of memory, it's the power of 1024 prefix. Anytime else, you're talking about the power of 10 prefix. So gigahertz is 10^9 hertz, but a gigabyte is 2^30 bytes.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Many things
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Technically, the electrons being "conducted" through a wire are the ones that were in the wire to begin with. The power comes from making them move. So power companies are selling our own electrons back to us!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: o one I know in the tech community uses those terms either
Most commonly it's from formatting hard drives, such that a
500 GB drive shows up as ~= 465.66 GiB available.
GB is ISO/IEC's notation for base 10, and GiB is the notation for base 2. So according to ISO/IEC, 2^30 bytes is technically a Gibibyte and that is shown as available space on most *nix and Windows computers. Apple decided to go with base 10 notation at Snow Leopard, so you show about the same as the box.
More info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix
Honestly, I think of it as an advertizing scam on customers for the most part and feel we should just stick with binary on computers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: o one I know in the tech community uses those terms either
Which is the same thing as "I've never heard of it." :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Highly questionable
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: o one I know in the tech community uses those terms either
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Just under 120MB/s
I base that on the fact that I've felt ripped off after buying a hard drive with an advertised capacity of 1GB and discovering that it had an actual capacity of only about 950MB.
(The original numbers were smaller; I think I first noticed this back around the time when 60GB was a midsize-to-large hard drive. Didn't make it any less noticeable to me, though.)
That said: yes, using different values for the multiplier prefixes for the different contexts (count of data size vs. count of anything else) does make the math harder, and the potential for confusion greater, when converting between them. However, the "powers of two" meaning of the prefixes in a data context were far too long-established before anyone tried to come up with replacement terminology. They left it too late; there's no going back and changing it now, and trying to do so is high-handed and offensive.the established one
[ link to this | view in thread ]