Why NSA's Betrayal Of Internet Security Is Akin To A Massive Public Health Disaster

from the infectious-ideas dept

Thu, Mar 13th 2014 7:24am — Glyn Moody

One of the most shocking of Snowden's revelations was that the NSA and GCHQ are deliberately weakening the Internet's security -- either by undermining standards, or by using zero-day vulnerabilities to break into systems. More recent news about the huge scale of attempts to infect computers with malware only compounds that outrage. It's hard to convey to ordinary Internet users the seriousness of what the NSA and GCHQ have done here, but in a brilliant new column in the Guardian, it looks like Cory Doctorow has done just that: I think there's a good case to be made for security as an exercise in public health. It sounds weird at first, but the parallels are fascinating and deep and instructive.
Here's the basic insight: If you discovered that your government was hoarding information about water-borne parasites instead of trying to eradicate them; if you discovered that they were more interested in weaponising typhus than they were in curing it, you would demand that your government treat your water-supply with the gravitas and seriousness that it is due.
Because that is precisely what the spying agencies are doing: they are intentionally withholding vital information about threats to your digital health -- the fact that programs you use are vulnerable to infections with malware, or that key security technologies you depend upon have backdoors -- regardless of the serious consequences this might have for you. If you try to imagine doctors doing the same in the case of equivalent threats to your health, you begin to get an idea of the depth of betrayal felt by computer professionals here. Doctorow goes on to point out that this is not just a matter of personal harm; the NSA and GCHQ are degrading the basic digital infrastructure of modern life: This is the most alarming part of the Snowden revelations: not just that spies are spying on all of us -- that they are actively sabotaging all of our technical infrastructure to ensure that they can continue to spy on us.

There is no way to weaken security in a way that makes it possible to spy on "bad guys" without making all of us vulnerable to bad guys, too. The goal of national security is totally incompatible with the tactic of weakening the nation's information security.

"Virus" has been a term of art in the security world for decades, and with good reason. It's a term that resonates with people, even people with only a cursory grasp of technology. As we strive to make the public and our elected representatives understand what's at stake, let's expand that pathogen/epidemiology metaphor. We'd never allow MI5 to suppress information on curing typhus so they could attack terrorists by infecting them with it. We need to stop allowing the NSA and GCHQ to suppress information on fixing bugs in our computers, phones, cars, houses, planes, and bodies.
Doctorow is right on both counts: we can't allow the NSA and GCHQ to withhold vital information that endangers the digital fabric of society, and the way to stop them is to use this public health metaphor to get that message across to politicians and the general public.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+ Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: cory doctorow, cybersecurity, gchq, hacking, nsa, public health, surveillance

25 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

BentFranklin (profile), 13 Mar 2014 @ 5:41am

The NSA fancies itself as the antibodies and white blood cells of the national corpus. Unfortunately, an overabundance of defense has given this nation a case of lupus.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mega1987 (profile), 13 Mar 2014 @ 6:17am

I think we can start Calling NSA and GCHQ the AIDS/HIV of the Internet Security....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ninja (profile), 13 Mar 2014 @ 7:21am

Re:
Beat me to it. This analogy (along with your biological comparison) is insanely appropriate. Although we do know they keep even "eradicated" pathogens stocked for future... "Uses".

Which points us to the sad fact that while everybody would be up in arms seeking blood of the Govt if it was about health nobody seems to grasp how critical the problem is when it moves to the digital realm. You know, when "on the Internet" is added and everything becomes black magic.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2014 @ 8:08am

Another possible metaphor
Cory is spot on. But I think that another metaphor would also be appropriate:
The NSA has 'intimate knowledge' of our Telco infrastructure by tapping cables and through backdoors
Think of this infrastructure as a body...anybody get the hint???
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Techanon, 13 Mar 2014 @ 8:27am

Re:
You Don't Want to Know
[ link to this | view in thread ]
me@me.net, 13 Mar 2014 @ 8:28am

the applicable term for what they have done
is treason
[ link to this | view in thread ]
JR Price (profile), 13 Mar 2014 @ 8:37am

Re:
Does that make Senator Feinstein, Dr. House?

It's never fucking lupus/the NSA...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2014 @ 9:13am

Re: Re:
Except that one time it was lupus!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2014 @ 9:38am

Re: Calling NSA GCHQ etc... AIDS
AIDS = Autocratic Internet Deficiency Syndrome

Spread through digital communication
Variety of attack vectors undermining natural defences
Weakens or mimics natural immune responses (encryption)
Exposes the host to other opportunistic diseases
Inevitably fatal if not controlled
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2014 @ 9:50am

The analogy also raises another depressing thought: if our "constitutional" governments undermine the public health of our internet infrastructure because, terrorism, what's to prevent them from undermining our biological public health because, terrorism? Remember that the US government caught Osama bin Laden, in part, through a fake vaccination drive (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-cia-fake-vaccination-campaign-endangers-us-all/). Previous to the NSA revelations, I would have viewed such a thought as paranoia and conspiracy. Now...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
madasahatter (profile), 13 Mar 2014 @ 10:00am

Stupidity
The analogy to typhus or cholera is apt. The spooks do not realize that destroying the web by spreading virus, worms, etc. will rebound on them. First, systems that are shutdown or isolated by definition are unavailable for these vectors. Secondly, like the biological diseases, these could infect your own systems. Third, an alert person might spot the infection, neutralize, and modify it to attack you much like the biological infections gain immunity, evolve.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2014 @ 10:02am

lol betrayal? you keep ratcheting up the nonsense, rhetoric, and sensationalism and then you wonder why nobody cares about the crusade of the so-called "internet rights activist".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2014 @ 11:01am

Re:
When you end up in a re-education camp because of something you posted on the net some years before your arrest, you will wish you supported Internet rights.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2014 @ 11:11am

"The spooks do not realize that destroying the web by spreading virus, worms, etc. will rebound on them."

Works as designed.

Job security and jobs for friends. For ever. And ever.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2014 @ 11:53am

Re: Re:
I'm thinking your tinfoil hat is on a bit too tight.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
observer, 13 Mar 2014 @ 12:36pm

Re: Re: Re:
While the post you're replying to is a tad extreme, it's hardly a tinfoil hat scenario. Tinfoil hat wearers are typically concerned about something that doesn't and often can't possibly exist, whereas there's hard evidence that the NSA et al have been compromising the security of the internet for their own ends.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2014 @ 12:44pm

Re:
The problem is that this isn't sensationalism. This is what is happening right now (see also: Stuxnet).

These people have forgotten who it is they actually work for.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
AC Unknown (profile), 13 Mar 2014 @ 1:58pm

Re:
Here. Have both my "Insightful" and my "Funny" votes. This analogy is definitely a good one.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2014 @ 6:35pm

Re:
average_joe just hates it when due process is enforced.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ray Trygstad (profile), 13 Mar 2014 @ 8:09pm

The more I look at it...
...the more it seems that The Guardian is the only reliable, objective English-language news source.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 14 Mar 2014 @ 1:09am

Re: Re: Re:
The level of spying being carried out is a dictators dream. It puts in place the system that they would need to try and control the population at at thought police level. All it it needs is the excuse for a dictator to take over. An extreme authoritarian president places a few of his cronies and supporter in key positions and ......
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 14 Mar 2014 @ 7:07am

Re: The more I look at it...
The Guardian is about as reliable and objective as Fox News.

Two peas in a pod.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Urgelt (profile), 14 Mar 2014 @ 11:16pm

Illegality
Releasing malware onto the internet is explicitly illegal. So why isn't the Justice Department prosecuting those who do it?

The answer is obvious. We are no longer a law-governed democracy. Government can do whatever it wishes - assassinate citizens and foreign persons (far from any battlefield), torture, incarcerate with no due process for as long as government wishes, spy on Americans, and infect hundreds of thousands of computers (with more intended) with malware. These are all symptoms of an authoritarian state, which is rule by fiat, not rule of law. And citizens 'have no standing' to challenge government's illegal actions.

This is a sad day in America.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Pragmatic, 18 Mar 2014 @ 6:15am

Re: Re: The more I look at it...
Is that so? The Snowden leaks turn out to be completely accurate, so stop pretending they don't matter. They do.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
GEMont (profile), 18 Mar 2014 @ 6:24pm

Re: Illegality
Stay tuned.

More to come.

You'll be going to participate in another undeclared war again real soon.

Happy Politician Day is here again!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]