There Is No Oversight: The NSA Withheld Documents From Intelligence Committee Heads
from the 'oversight'-is-the-new-'forced-myopia' dept
There has never been effective oversight of the NSA's bulk collections programs, or indeed, intelligence agencies in general. There's been a lot of noise made about this vaunted oversight in defense of programs revealed by leaked documents, but this is nothing more than a talking point.
The NSA (along with the CIA) has no interest in real oversight or accountability, not even to the final arbiter of its domestic surveillance, the FISA court. Judge Walton threatened to end the Section 215 collection back in 2008 after uncovering widespread abuse of the collections and the NSA's constant misrepresentation of how it was handling the data it collected.
Over the last several months, it's become apparent that the committees charged with oversight have withheld documents from their colleagues, and the agencies themselves have avoided answering specific questions about their tactics, turning oversight hearings into games of "20 questions."
But one would think the intelligence committees themselves would be on the inside track, considering chairpersons and ranking members are some of the most fervent defenders of domestic surveillance. That assumption would be wrong as well.
At The Big Picture, a clip of Sen. John D. Rockefeller (then Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence) discussing how oversight actually works has been posted. It's from an interview given in 2007, about the time the FISA Amendments Act was being put together to replace the expiring Protect America Act. The amendments act, among other things, extended the length of warrantless surveillance and gave telecoms retroactive immunity for their participation in the NSA's bulk collections.
Here's Rockefeller explaining why, even back in 2007, intelligence oversight was a joke.
The clip only contains Rockefeller's response to the question (in bold below). Here's the answer in context.
DAVIS: Reports quote administration officials as saying this is going on and it’s being done in a way to avoid oversight of the Intelligence Committee. Is there any way—It goes all the way back, as The Big Picture points out. The NSA was created by President Truman in 1952 with a secret memo. The FBI -- the name under which bulk telephone records are collected -- was similarly crafted without Congressional consent.
ROCKEFELLER: They’ll go to any lengths to do that, as we’ve seen in the last two days [during hearings on FISA].
DAVIS: Is there anything you could do in your position as Chairman of the Intelligence Committee to find answers about this, if it is in fact going on?
ROCKEFELLER: Don’t you understand the way Intelligence works? Do you think that because I’m Chairman of the Intelligence Committee that I just say I want it, and they give it to me? They control it. All of it. ALL of it. ALL THE TIME. I only get - and my committee only gets - what they WANT to give me.
The Bureau of Investigation (BOI) was created on July 26, 1908, after Congress had adjourned for the summer. Attorney General Bonaparte, using Department of Justice expense funds, hired thirty-four people, including some veterans of the Secret Service, to work for a new investigative agency. Its first chief (the title is now known as director) was Stanley Finch. Bonaparte notified Congress of these actions in December, 1908.If the agency was created without Congressional consent, it stands to reason those in it feel legislative oversight is both unwelcome and unnecessary. There's a lot more oversight happening now, but that's mainly because the NSA can't withhold leaked information from the committees. It's all out in the open.
So, when defenders of the agency start talking about oversight and legality, be sure to remind them that neither of these aspects are particularly strong. The agency operated in darkness for many, many years and the programs that skirted the Constitution were only made legal by dubious, reactionary legislation and secret interpretations of existing laws.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: congress, john rockefeller, nsa, oversight, senate intelligence committee, surveillance
Reader Comments
The First Word
“The NSA has betrayed the American people
If you're afraid to conduct the business of the American people in full view of the American people, and if you're afraid to be held accountable to the elected representatives of the American people, then you do not serve the American people. You serve yourselves. You're not patriots. You're not brave. You're not upholding the Constitution. You're not defending the country. You're just indulging your vanity and self-importance delusions.Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Remember
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Remember
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Remember
Exactly. We are on the receiving end. Why you ask? Because REDACTED.
The Ministry for State Security...I mean...the NSA is only trying to help. Move along CITIZEN, there is no story here...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The NSA has betrayed the American people
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oversight/Public: I think I'm entitled!
NSA: You want answers?!
Oversight/Public: I want the truth!
NSA: You can't handle the truth!
=P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I get it they don't HAVE to report to Congress; the whole thing's basically a dog-and-pony act to shut people up (although come to think of it, it IS often funny watching them testify to Congress - it's like watching juvenile delinquents handing in their punishment essays on the topic "Why The Law Is A Good Thing" - lots of ass-grabbing and sly nudges going on in the back row there).
What I DON'T get is, where are the adults in this fucked up gang of torturers and gleeful eavesdroppers? 'Lord Of The Flies' is NOT a how-to book.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He got it right the first time.
That goes for the members of Congress, too. Everyone is playing hide and seek, without any repercussions.
Maybe it's about time someone in Washington grows a set and decides to stop this shit. Problem is, everyone is so very intent on keeping their jobs. Perhaps we should deprive some of theirs
I mean, we pay for this every single year..in taxes. What do we get for our money?
Surveillance, lies, deceit and hypocrisy.
Such a bargain!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: He got it right the first time.
If you actually picked up the full tab, you would not need to raise the debt ceilings all the time.
Other nations are paying for your surveillance apparatus, and your debt is a promise that you'll return something of value eventually.
But all your anti-terrorism machine does not produce anything of value. "Quality of life" is something drawing investments as it assures a stable supply of qualified and dedicated long-term workers. But in the U.S., you are much more likely to be killed by street robbery (from people coming from a background unable to afford an education) or by police than by terrorists.
The sad thing is you'll save more lives by focusing surveillance on police officers than on the general public, at quite reduced cost.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: He got it right the first time.
No seriously, please do, since my banking is done completely in the Cayman Islands I don't feel raped anymore. And I'm only Canadian. Hi CSEC!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]