City Of London Police Create Secret 'Pirate Site Blacklist' For Advertisers, With No Transparency
from the hollywood's-private-police-force dept
It really looks like Hollywood has finally gotten its own private police force in the form of the tiny City of London Police (not to be confused with the London Metropolitan Police -- as everyone always wants to remind people). The City of London Police, technically, are in charge of protecting a tiny spec of London, right in the middle -- covering about a square mile, with a population of about 7,400 people. Yet, because of the "London" name, people often think they're bigger and more important than they really are, and the legacy entertainment industry appears to have seized on this in a big, big way, gleefully supporting their efforts. Of course, the UK government has helped as well, by giving the City of London Police £2.56 million ($4.3 million) to take orders from the entertainment industry.And we've seen just how hamfisted these efforts have become. Last fall, the City of London Police started ordering registrars to shut down a bunch of websites based on no legal authority whatsoever, and no court order (no court proceedings at all). It was just the City of London Police saying so. And the ridiculous part is that many clueless registrars complied, despite it being against ICANN rules to do so.
Over the past few months, the City of London Police have also been targeting advertising on sites that the entertainment industry tells them are illegal -- again with no actual review by a court to determine if those claims are accurate. Their latest move is to create a "pirate site blacklist" that they will give to advertisers, telling them they should not allow advertising to go on those sites. The list was put together "in collaboration with entertainment industry groups." The City of London Police refuse to reveal what's on the list, despite the fact that the list was put together with taxpayer funds in the UK.
This is problematic for any number of reasons, but the biggest may be what happened the last time such a list was put together. As you may recall, a bunch of the same music labels came up with a very similar list for advertising giant GroupM, a part of WPP three years ago. And that list, which eventually was revealed, was such a mess that it included tons of legitimate sites including hip hop blogs, Vimeo, SoundCloud and more. The most ridiculous of all? The list, which was mostly put together by people at Universal Music, included Universal Music artist 50 Cent's own personal website.
One would hope that the labels and the City of London Police will be more careful this time around, but given that they're keeping the taxpayer-funded list a secret, who can tell?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: advertisers, bpi, city of london, city of london police, ifpi, pirate site blacklist, transparency
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"The police will need to find a way to advertise on sites without paying money, or the campaign itself will end up financing the very sites they aim to close. "
If I'm reading that correctly, then the ads that are advertising the legitimate services (Netflix et al) will not be charged for, which to me smacks of much corruption. After all, when was the last time a government body said to owners and operators of private property that they have to allow free advertising for these other guys on their property, where advertising space is usually charged for?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bribe
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Never ceases to amaze...
Why, it's almost as though they know their actions wouldn't hold up in court in a truly adversarial setting, where the accused was able to present a defense and counter their accusations. /s
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A listed website domain regardless of any piracy affiliation, closing up shop and selling the non-publicly disclosed domain name to an upstart that can't get advertisers because their new fancy domain name is on a secret list.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This won't convert pirates to paying customers
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The problem here is thereis no way of knowing whether there evidence is good to begin with or how it was obtained and the police seem to be willing to accept it carte blanche on it's face and act upon it.
The part that FACT is allowed to come into your home, collect supposed evidence and then do the talking while you are being detained makes them a arm of government, even though they have no standing and should be letting the police handle this themselves.
The mere fact that the Britsh government seems to think that a private entity should get to run around the U.K. playing cop seems unfathomable.
I sincerely hope anyone charged takes this to court and airs it out for a Judge to hear. I think they will have a trouble with the fact that a private U.S. entity is supplying evidence, playing police officers, interrogating people and then bring this into a court room.
I find that very troubling
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Fascist "police" are Fascist
So obviously corrupt, it's not funny. Those "police" do not work for the people. They hunt people on behalf of their bidders.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How many detectives are going to be unable to follow up on tip-offs because their department's manpower and resources are being used to chase after people for bootlegging DVDs?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
So, not only are they getting the police to do their bidding, they're potentially able to get them to enforce potentially illegal anti-competitive practices for them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Best not to downplay the "City Of London", Mike
I realise that you're going for the "This is some tiny local police force" angle, here, but it's the wrong angle. This is "Wall Street UK"'s police force, and this rather indicates that the "Wall Street UK" police force is in the pay of "Wall Street UK" itself. Rather worrying.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Best not to downplay the "City Of London", Mike
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Let's try some sauce for the gander
[ link to this | view in thread ]