60 Days After Being Asked, James Clapper Finally Answers Ron Wyden's Question About Collecting US Citizens' Communications
from the and-it's-a-'yes;'-it's-ALWAYS-a-'yes' dept
The game of 20 questions (National Security Edition) has finally paid off, weeks after the question was asked. Ron Wyden, one of the few legislators willing to pin down (or at least attempt to -- the NATSEC reps are a slippery bunch) exactly what the NSA is up to, has received a response to one his pointed questions. (Wyden's ability to ask precisely the right question has pretty much turned any intel official's answer along the lines of "we can't discuss this publicly for national security reasons" into a de facto "yes.")
[I]n a letter to Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat on the intelligence committee, the director of national intelligence, James Clapper, has confirmed for the first time this backdoor had been used in practice to search for data related to “US persons”.So, there's the admission Wyden was seeking back on January 29th, but the story goes back much further than that. This is something that has been denied and obfuscated since the leaks began back in June of last year. The NSA (along with other agencies most likely) can grab American's communications without a warrant. It claims this is all legit because the agency "reasonably believes" these communications serve its foreign intelligence directive.
“There have been queries, using US person identifiers, of communications lawfully acquired to obtain foreign intelligence targeting non-US persons reasonably believed to be located outside the United States,” Clapper wrote in the letter, which has been obtained by the Guardian.
“These queries were performed pursuant to minimization procedures approved by the Fisa court and consistent with the statute and the fourth amendment.”
Clapper disingenuously points out that this was discussed during the debate over the renewal of Section 702 late last year.
“As you know, when Congress reauthorized Section 702, the proposal to restrict such queries was specifically raised and ultimately not adopted,” Clapper wrote.Of course, no one had access to this information as Clapper and others had yet to officially acknowledge this backdoor.
But someone did know about this backdoor, and he's known about it for months: new director of the NSA, Mike Rogers.
It has taken just 9 months for Clapper to admit that, contrary to months of denials, the NSA (and FBI, which he doesn’t confirm but which the Report makes clear, as well as the CIA) can get the content of Americans’ communications without a warrant.Again, the NSA, for all intents and purposes, has no oversight. Ron Wyden serves on the Senate Intelligence Committee and he's one of the few in this position who will actually attempt to extract info from closed-lipped intelligence officials. Despite his efforts, it took two months for him to obtain an answer that was declassified in August 2013. That's how the system actually works, but those defending the obfuscation artists charged with national security keep foisting their utopian dreamscape of checks and balances on the agency's many critics.
But Clapper’s admission that this fact was declassified in August should disqualify Vice Admiral Mike Rogers from confirmation as CyberComm head (I believe he started serving as DIRNSA head, which doesn’t require confirmation, yesterday). Because it means Rogers refused to answer a question the response to which was already declassified.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: admiral mike rogers, backdoor loophole, james clapper, nsa, odni, ron wyden, surveillance, warrantless searches, warrants
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
MY guess is, 'Clapper gets a raise and a promotion'. Talk about failing upwards.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This is baaaaad,
Also with this admission, every attorney of a client convicted using evidence supplied by any Federal agency has reasonable grounds to challenge the conviction based on the theory that the evidence originated via unlawful NSA surveillance and was backdoored to another Federal entity to conceal it's origin.
These men have no idea of the immense damage that they have caused.
.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
FISA court is illegal, entire operation violates 4th Ammendment
You violated the 4th ammendment, the FISA court itself is an illegal entity and every member on it a traitor to this country.
All alphabet organizations, the FISA court on up through the president should be tried for treason.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
"Aid and comfort" is defined as material aid, not just "gave our enemies a chuckle."
Nothing anyone has done here (including Snowden) qualifies as Treason. There are likely many other crimes committed, but let's stop trotting out treason.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: FISA court is illegal, entire operation violates 4th Ammendment
TL:DR it's not Treason. None of it.
It's shady, illegal, immoral... All of those things. But not treason.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This is baaaaad,
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
- Providing backdoors to nearly every system to foreign hackers.
- Messing up internet security standards.
- Providing moral highground and reason to hate the usa to foreign tehrroris organizations. (AQ HR dept thank you very much)
Waging war on the USA:
- Eavesdropping on most of the population of the USA.
- Providing ways to selectively enforce laws on anyone in the US.
- Collecting blackmail material on government officials to wrestle control from them.
- Wasting B$s of taxpayer money that could save lives.
Just a few that came into my mind
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]