Journalists Sue Government After Military Security Seizes Cameras And Deletes Photos Of Publicly-Visible Structures
from the abusive-powers-gorging-on-self-induced-paranoia dept
Photography is the new "driving while black." Not that the original "driving while black" has actually vanished, what with New York City making "walking while black" the equivalent of reasonable suspicion, but now people of all races, even those normally somewhat immune to harassment, can join in on the "fun" of low-level oppression.
Two members of the Toledo (OH) Blade found themselves being screwed with by military security while taking photographs of stuff in plain sight. (via Poynter)
Mr. Linkhorn and Ms. Fraser were in Lima covering a Ford Motor Co. news conference at the automaker’s plant there. Afterward, they went to shoot photos of businesses in the area for future use, including the tank plant, which is also known as the Joint Systems Manufacturing Center.The Lima, OH tank plant is well known and has been photographed before. The company makes no secret about what it manufactures, having placed this right in front of its plant.
The reporters were at the entry portions of the plant, in an area where no fence or gate restricted access, according to the complaint. They did not pass a guard hut, which is about 30 feet from Buckeye Road.
But because all things, even photography of visible structures, inevitably lead to terrorism, security at the Lima plant decided to step in and stop the two Blade employees from gathering any more "intel."
Blade reporter Tyrel Linkhorn and photographer Jetta Fraser were detained March 28 by military security outside the plant and had cameras confiscated and pictures deleted.This alone would step outside the boundaries set by the Constitution, but the security officers went even further, harassing the photographer by making various comments about her (perceived) lack of femininity, including referring to her using masculine pronouns and offering to "go under her bra."
Now, because those in charge of "protecting" the plant from photography of visible "assets" were unable to restrain themselves, a long list of names linked to the military contractor have been named in a civil rights lawsuit.
The lawsuit claims Ms. Fraser and Mr. Linkhorn's First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment rights were deprived, as were their rights under the First Amendment Privacy Protection Act.As is noted in the lawsuit, everything photographed could be seen from a public road. You can see satellite photography of the plant via Google Maps, not to mention closer looks via Street View. None of this has been redacted by government request. Details on buildings, including interior structures, are listed in a 1984 "Historic American Engineering Record" produced and made public by the contractor itself. Much of what's contained is now outdated, but what's included in this public report was current as of 1980, four years prior to its release.
"At all material times, Plaintiffs Fraser and Linkhorn were present in places that were open to the public and in which Plaintiffs had a lawful right to be," the lawsuit states. "At all material times, Plaintiffs Fraser and Linkhorn were engaged in fully lawful and constitutionally protected conduct, observing and photographing subjects that were and are open to public view and that Plaintiffs had full legal and constitutional rights to observe and photograph."
An image search for "Lima Army Tank Plant" brings up a host of current photos, many of which show the inside of the building, something that would be vastly more sensitive than anything obtained by a photographer located outside the boundaries of the plant itself.
Despite all of this info being readily available, plant security allegedly named the following as the impetus for its seizure of the camera and deletion of photos.
Ms. Fraser said that an officer told her that taking pictures of the plant’s power supply that is visible from the street raised the “suspicion of terrorism.”Much like the DHS and its useless Fusion Centers, everyone in the military-industrial complex (along with the intelligence community in general) is buying into the lie that photographing visible structures is "terrorism." If these publicly-viewable buildings pose so much of a threat simply by being observed, maybe security officers should stop harassing photographers and throw a few tarps over the sensitive structures or something.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: free speech, freedom of the press, journalism, photos, tanks
Companies: ford
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I like your comment but I want to pick option A and option B, 'or' just doesn't do them justice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
yes and yes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But, but, but-!
Oh, right, GPS. Because we all know said tarps would be to hide the embarrassment they are to the people, making we as a people look like a bunch of crazy morons than we already look to the rest of the world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NOOOOOOOO don't say that, don't give them ideas !!! Next up will be DMCA takedown notices and strong-arming Google to remove all copies worldwide a la Cindy Garcia.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Field trip!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Field trip!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's really difficult to really delete data from Flash RAM.
Heh.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Finally have something to do this weekend.
Now I will go out of my way to learn everything I can about them, their employees, their product, their affiliations and what they eat for lunch.
What a couple of idiot personnel. Lets now shine a huge spotlight on this plant and everything it does due to these security guards acting so dumb.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
all female terrorists look like men
I suppose that every citizen will be on the lookout, now that is has been made clear that women who don't look like Dolly Parton are probably terrorists.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Also when you visit an ER these days, there's more fucking Garda wannabe-cops who didn't pass academy after the mandatory 3 years of college we have in this province to keep the morons out of the police force, so they had to settle for security guard, than nurses or doctors, probably by 10:1 ratio. If the goal is keeping out would be sick people without a GP (too common around here) who get outraged at the wait time, I think it might work (I let a simple bronchitis turn into pneumonia before showing up at the ER last year, I got prompt treatment, but all this to say that the wave of security guards everywhere, the worst example I can give is your regular meathead tough guy with a black SECURITY in the back suit walking around in a supermarket, yeah, a supermarket. Only in that one have I ever seen one but it made me sure to never go there again.
Thankfully they are not authorized to carry any weapons, which I think is not the case in many US states.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And in closing just let misquote a line or two from a song: Tanks for the memories. Of photos no longer seen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
national security
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You know, nothing makes ME more suspicious of possible terrorists...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Publicly-Visible Structure"
For the benefit of the other visually-impaired Techdirt readers, I'll post the original PDF download link.
http://www.toledoblade.com/attachment/2014/04/04/Complaint-filed.pdf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Funny, I found just the solution to this problem...
http://hackaday.com/2014/03/27/riotnas-mobile-storage-for-street-photography/
Basically it is a portable wireless access point and mass storage device powered by a battery and concealed within a small bag/purse. Then they make use of a phone app that constantly mirrors the photo directory on your phone.
Some people in the comments have apparently built a similar system using some of the SD cards with built in wireless to give this functionality to digital cameras.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]