USPTO Keeps Granting Patents At Record Rates: 6,000 Utility Patents Granted In A Single Week
from the throwing-sand-in-the-gears-of-innovation dept
With the latest attempt at patent reform stalling out a bit, it's worth looking at how the last attempt to reform patents to stop abuse, 2011's America Invents Act, has helped solve the problem of bogus patents. Oh, actually, it hasn't. As Patently-O notes, patenting has continued to shoot up at an insane pace, setting new records along the way. Does anyone actually believe that the US has really become that much more inventive in just the past few years, or can we reasonably assume that the USPTO is passing a ton of crappy patents, ensuring that patent trolling activities over bad patents continue for decades to come? The latest dubious "record" is the USPTO granting over 6,000 utility patents in a single week.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Quick nurse, give him the sedagive!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This quote from the guy that tries to pepper all his arguments with the word "innovation".
This site never fails to provide comic relief. It's like a parody except the people writing here seem to actually believe part of the BS they spew.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I suggest that if you disapprove of the technology sector's innovations and inventions that you get off the Internet, toss your cellular telephone, unplug your television, and never get another CT or MRI scan.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
First of all 'copying' is not stealing.
Secondly, patents are stealing. Patents aren't a reward for being inventive (it's not like any of the patents are socially useful), patents are a way for lawyers and patent trolls to deprive others of their living by telling them that they can't do something without giving money to a parasite that did nothing to earn it. That's stealing.
Patents are a form of dictatorship. The government is allowing private entities to tell others what they can't do. No thanks. Others, and especially the tech world composed of people a whole lot smarter than you, can come up with the same ideas all on their own and they can implement them without your help. No one needs you and I would rather live in a world where I am free to independently invent an idea and implement it and commercialize it than to live in a world where you get to tell me that I can't do something simply because you have a patent on it. If you don't like it keep your ideas to yourself because we don't need you.
Where is the patent that tells me how to build my monitor? How to build my computer and the processor? How to build my phone? The companies making these devices have all sorts of patents yet none of them are any use to competitors whatsoever. They were all written by a bunch of lawyers with vague and ambiguous words that mean nothing useful to anyone. If anything patents prevent the release of technical manuals because some stupid lawyer in a patent trolling law firm might read one and find some infringing spec. Patents have turned into a minefield where anyone that does anything might end up infringing on something by mistake despite the fact that they didn't need the patent to come up with the idea.
You're not entitled to the government granting you a patent and I want the government to stop granting patents. I know this won't be popular among undemocratic politicians that desire to pass laws in exchange for campaign contributions and revolving door favors but those politicians shouldn't be in office.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
And I want the government to chauffeur you along to the funny farm; however despite my request no doubt being the more rational, neither of us are going to have our wish granted.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
And your request is supposed to be rational?
Go choke on a CD.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
The advocacy of copying is indeed a very simplistic view. Nothing quite like watching someone else do the heavy lifting with labor and money, and then swooping to reap benefits of something in which a party has made zero investment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The only way that your scenario would work is if you were to somehow persuade the inventor or creator to sign over the patent or copyright to a corporation, or something. Wait...
...that's the thing we're complaining about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Secondly patent trolls do no heavy lifting. They acquire patents and steal from the innovators that do all the heavy lifting.
Thirdly coming up with ideas is not heavy lifting. Anyone can sit around and come up with ideas all day. Implementation is heavy lifting. Patents are a form of watching someone else do the heavy lifting of innovating and swooping in and stealing their profits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Agreed!
So let's see MIke Masnick discuss Google's market share.
And see him demand that Google release their patents into the public domain.
Uh huh.
Let's see that.
Everybody wait for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Ok. I worry that Google has too much power, though it does seem that there is growing competition in all important areas -- and little to no lock-in. Android is a little scarier than elsewhere since there's slightly more lock-in, and I wish that Google was much more open with Android.
And see him demand that Google release their patents into the public domain.
That one I wholly agree with. Google absolutely could help change the debate by announcing that it will not use its patents offensively. And, of course, I've said similar things in the past, contrary to your claims: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120209/18063117722/if-google-is-serious-about-reforming-patent-m ess-it-should-make-bold-statement-stop-using-motorola-patents-to-demand-cash.shtml
I think Twitter's patent program (which lets engineers themselves block any legal actions by the company) is a good start but that companies could and should go much further: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120417/10324218529/twitters-revolutionary-agreement-lets-origina l-inventors-stop-patent-trolls.shtml
Though, to be fair, Google has not launched *any* patent lawsuits against another company (it has only responded to inbound patent lawsuits with counterclaims). The one exception -- which I called the company out on -- was going to the ITC against Apple (though that was Motorola, really, and Apple was already suing over Android anyway): http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120820/02045620096/google-launches-patent-attack-apple-disappoint ing-first-company.shtml
Google did recently make a promise not to use patents to sue open source efforts, but I actually criticized the company directly for not going nearly far enough (and, even arguing that the statement suggested a greater proclivity to sue others): http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130328/11323422494/google-promises-not-to-launch- patent-lawsuits-against-open-source-software-could-go-much-further.shtml
But, yes, I think Google could make a big statement by officially stating that it will not use patents offensively, and I'm disappointed the company has not done so.
Uh huh.
Okay.
Let's see that.
All for it.
Everybody wait for it.
Didn't have to wait long.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Oh, wait...
(and yes, I know I'm not being original.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is progress
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is progress
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: This is progress
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Efficient
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
USPTO
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Sorry, prior art has never prevented anything from being invented, innovated or improved on.
The patent system does prevent innovation and improvement without a license, which nobody is obliged to grant.
Sorry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This post has a misleading statement
[ link to this | view in chronology ]